Cargando…
Comparison of small interfering RNA (siRNA) delivery into bovine monocyte-derived macrophages by transfection and electroporation
The manipulation of the RNA interference pathway using small interfering RNA (siRNA) has become the most frequently used gene silencing method. However, siRNA delivery into primary cells, especially primary macrophages, is often considered challenging. Here we report the investigation of the suitabi...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Scientific
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3988888/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24598124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2014.02.002 |
_version_ | 1782312083842400256 |
---|---|
author | Jensen, Kirsty Anderson, Jennifer A. Glass, Elizabeth J. |
author_facet | Jensen, Kirsty Anderson, Jennifer A. Glass, Elizabeth J. |
author_sort | Jensen, Kirsty |
collection | PubMed |
description | The manipulation of the RNA interference pathway using small interfering RNA (siRNA) has become the most frequently used gene silencing method. However, siRNA delivery into primary cells, especially primary macrophages, is often considered challenging. Here we report the investigation of the suitability of two methodologies: transient transfection and electroporation, to deliver siRNA targeted against the putative immunomodulatory gene Mediterranean fever (MEFV) into primary bovine monocyte-derived macrophages (bMDM). Eleven commercial transfection reagents were investigated with variable results with respect to siRNA uptake, target gene knock-down, cell toxicity and type I interferon (IFN) response induction. Three transfection reagents: Lipofectamine 2000, Lipofectamine RNAiMAX and DharmaFECT 3, were found to consistently give the best results. However, all the transfection reagents tested induced an IFN response in the absence of siRNA, which could be minimized by reducing the transfection reagent incubation period. In addition, optimized siRNA delivery into bMDM by electroporation achieved comparable levels of target gene knock-down as transient transfection, without a detectable IFN response, but with higher levels of cell toxicity. The optimized transient transfection and electroporation methodologies may provide a starting point for optimizing siRNA delivery into macrophages derived from other species or other cells considered difficult to investigate with siRNA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3988888 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Elsevier Scientific |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39888882014-04-17 Comparison of small interfering RNA (siRNA) delivery into bovine monocyte-derived macrophages by transfection and electroporation Jensen, Kirsty Anderson, Jennifer A. Glass, Elizabeth J. Vet Immunol Immunopathol Research Paper The manipulation of the RNA interference pathway using small interfering RNA (siRNA) has become the most frequently used gene silencing method. However, siRNA delivery into primary cells, especially primary macrophages, is often considered challenging. Here we report the investigation of the suitability of two methodologies: transient transfection and electroporation, to deliver siRNA targeted against the putative immunomodulatory gene Mediterranean fever (MEFV) into primary bovine monocyte-derived macrophages (bMDM). Eleven commercial transfection reagents were investigated with variable results with respect to siRNA uptake, target gene knock-down, cell toxicity and type I interferon (IFN) response induction. Three transfection reagents: Lipofectamine 2000, Lipofectamine RNAiMAX and DharmaFECT 3, were found to consistently give the best results. However, all the transfection reagents tested induced an IFN response in the absence of siRNA, which could be minimized by reducing the transfection reagent incubation period. In addition, optimized siRNA delivery into bMDM by electroporation achieved comparable levels of target gene knock-down as transient transfection, without a detectable IFN response, but with higher levels of cell toxicity. The optimized transient transfection and electroporation methodologies may provide a starting point for optimizing siRNA delivery into macrophages derived from other species or other cells considered difficult to investigate with siRNA. Elsevier Scientific 2014-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3988888/ /pubmed/24598124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2014.02.002 Text en © 2014 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Jensen, Kirsty Anderson, Jennifer A. Glass, Elizabeth J. Comparison of small interfering RNA (siRNA) delivery into bovine monocyte-derived macrophages by transfection and electroporation |
title | Comparison of small interfering RNA (siRNA) delivery into bovine monocyte-derived macrophages by transfection and electroporation |
title_full | Comparison of small interfering RNA (siRNA) delivery into bovine monocyte-derived macrophages by transfection and electroporation |
title_fullStr | Comparison of small interfering RNA (siRNA) delivery into bovine monocyte-derived macrophages by transfection and electroporation |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of small interfering RNA (siRNA) delivery into bovine monocyte-derived macrophages by transfection and electroporation |
title_short | Comparison of small interfering RNA (siRNA) delivery into bovine monocyte-derived macrophages by transfection and electroporation |
title_sort | comparison of small interfering rna (sirna) delivery into bovine monocyte-derived macrophages by transfection and electroporation |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3988888/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24598124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2014.02.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jensenkirsty comparisonofsmallinterferingrnasirnadeliveryintobovinemonocytederivedmacrophagesbytransfectionandelectroporation AT andersonjennifera comparisonofsmallinterferingrnasirnadeliveryintobovinemonocytederivedmacrophagesbytransfectionandelectroporation AT glasselizabethj comparisonofsmallinterferingrnasirnadeliveryintobovinemonocytederivedmacrophagesbytransfectionandelectroporation |