Cargando…

Comparison of small interfering RNA (siRNA) delivery into bovine monocyte-derived macrophages by transfection and electroporation

The manipulation of the RNA interference pathway using small interfering RNA (siRNA) has become the most frequently used gene silencing method. However, siRNA delivery into primary cells, especially primary macrophages, is often considered challenging. Here we report the investigation of the suitabi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jensen, Kirsty, Anderson, Jennifer A., Glass, Elizabeth J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Scientific 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3988888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24598124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2014.02.002
_version_ 1782312083842400256
author Jensen, Kirsty
Anderson, Jennifer A.
Glass, Elizabeth J.
author_facet Jensen, Kirsty
Anderson, Jennifer A.
Glass, Elizabeth J.
author_sort Jensen, Kirsty
collection PubMed
description The manipulation of the RNA interference pathway using small interfering RNA (siRNA) has become the most frequently used gene silencing method. However, siRNA delivery into primary cells, especially primary macrophages, is often considered challenging. Here we report the investigation of the suitability of two methodologies: transient transfection and electroporation, to deliver siRNA targeted against the putative immunomodulatory gene Mediterranean fever (MEFV) into primary bovine monocyte-derived macrophages (bMDM). Eleven commercial transfection reagents were investigated with variable results with respect to siRNA uptake, target gene knock-down, cell toxicity and type I interferon (IFN) response induction. Three transfection reagents: Lipofectamine 2000, Lipofectamine RNAiMAX and DharmaFECT 3, were found to consistently give the best results. However, all the transfection reagents tested induced an IFN response in the absence of siRNA, which could be minimized by reducing the transfection reagent incubation period. In addition, optimized siRNA delivery into bMDM by electroporation achieved comparable levels of target gene knock-down as transient transfection, without a detectable IFN response, but with higher levels of cell toxicity. The optimized transient transfection and electroporation methodologies may provide a starting point for optimizing siRNA delivery into macrophages derived from other species or other cells considered difficult to investigate with siRNA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3988888
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Elsevier Scientific
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39888882014-04-17 Comparison of small interfering RNA (siRNA) delivery into bovine monocyte-derived macrophages by transfection and electroporation Jensen, Kirsty Anderson, Jennifer A. Glass, Elizabeth J. Vet Immunol Immunopathol Research Paper The manipulation of the RNA interference pathway using small interfering RNA (siRNA) has become the most frequently used gene silencing method. However, siRNA delivery into primary cells, especially primary macrophages, is often considered challenging. Here we report the investigation of the suitability of two methodologies: transient transfection and electroporation, to deliver siRNA targeted against the putative immunomodulatory gene Mediterranean fever (MEFV) into primary bovine monocyte-derived macrophages (bMDM). Eleven commercial transfection reagents were investigated with variable results with respect to siRNA uptake, target gene knock-down, cell toxicity and type I interferon (IFN) response induction. Three transfection reagents: Lipofectamine 2000, Lipofectamine RNAiMAX and DharmaFECT 3, were found to consistently give the best results. However, all the transfection reagents tested induced an IFN response in the absence of siRNA, which could be minimized by reducing the transfection reagent incubation period. In addition, optimized siRNA delivery into bMDM by electroporation achieved comparable levels of target gene knock-down as transient transfection, without a detectable IFN response, but with higher levels of cell toxicity. The optimized transient transfection and electroporation methodologies may provide a starting point for optimizing siRNA delivery into macrophages derived from other species or other cells considered difficult to investigate with siRNA. Elsevier Scientific 2014-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3988888/ /pubmed/24598124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2014.02.002 Text en © 2014 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Research Paper
Jensen, Kirsty
Anderson, Jennifer A.
Glass, Elizabeth J.
Comparison of small interfering RNA (siRNA) delivery into bovine monocyte-derived macrophages by transfection and electroporation
title Comparison of small interfering RNA (siRNA) delivery into bovine monocyte-derived macrophages by transfection and electroporation
title_full Comparison of small interfering RNA (siRNA) delivery into bovine monocyte-derived macrophages by transfection and electroporation
title_fullStr Comparison of small interfering RNA (siRNA) delivery into bovine monocyte-derived macrophages by transfection and electroporation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of small interfering RNA (siRNA) delivery into bovine monocyte-derived macrophages by transfection and electroporation
title_short Comparison of small interfering RNA (siRNA) delivery into bovine monocyte-derived macrophages by transfection and electroporation
title_sort comparison of small interfering rna (sirna) delivery into bovine monocyte-derived macrophages by transfection and electroporation
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3988888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24598124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2014.02.002
work_keys_str_mv AT jensenkirsty comparisonofsmallinterferingrnasirnadeliveryintobovinemonocytederivedmacrophagesbytransfectionandelectroporation
AT andersonjennifera comparisonofsmallinterferingrnasirnadeliveryintobovinemonocytederivedmacrophagesbytransfectionandelectroporation
AT glasselizabethj comparisonofsmallinterferingrnasirnadeliveryintobovinemonocytederivedmacrophagesbytransfectionandelectroporation