Cargando…
Outcome and Prognostic Factors in T4a Oropharyngeal Carcinoma, Including the Role of HPV Infection
Background. The prognosis of patients with advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPSCC) is generally poor. The aim of this study is to investigate the different therapeutic approaches and identify prognostic factors associated with a worse outcome for patients treated for T4a OPSCC, in order to improve...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3988966/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24800220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/390825 |
_version_ | 1782312099121201152 |
---|---|
author | Psychogios, Georgios Mantsopoulos, Konstantinos Agaimy, Abbas Brunner, Kathrin Mangold, Elisabeth Zenk, Johannes Iro, Heinrich |
author_facet | Psychogios, Georgios Mantsopoulos, Konstantinos Agaimy, Abbas Brunner, Kathrin Mangold, Elisabeth Zenk, Johannes Iro, Heinrich |
author_sort | Psychogios, Georgios |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. The prognosis of patients with advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPSCC) is generally poor. The aim of this study is to investigate the different therapeutic approaches and identify prognostic factors associated with a worse outcome for patients treated for T4a OPSCC, in order to improve treatment selection for the individual. Methods. A retrospective study was conducted on 426 patients with T4a OPC treated between 1980 and 2010. Eleven prognostic factors including treatment modality, lymph node staging, and p16 status as a surrogate marker for human papillomavirus (HPV) infection were analyzed. Results. Univariate analysis showed a significant difference in DSS between N0 and N+ (57.1% versus 26.9%, P < 0.001), primary surgical and primary nonsurgical treatment (52.7% versus 31.4%, P < 0.001), and perinodal invasion (51.7% versus 19.9%, P = 0.011). P16-negative patients tended towards a worse DSS than p16-positive patients (40.2% versus 64.6%, P = 0.126) but responded better to primary surgery than to nonsurgical treatment (71.4% versus 34.0%, P = 0.113). Multivariate analysis identified the N category as an independent prognostic factor for survival. Conclusion. The survival of p16-negative patients was worse than p16-positive patients, although they seem to respond better to primary surgery. The strongest independent prognostic factor for T4a carcinomas proved to be the presence of lymph node metastases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3988966 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39889662014-05-05 Outcome and Prognostic Factors in T4a Oropharyngeal Carcinoma, Including the Role of HPV Infection Psychogios, Georgios Mantsopoulos, Konstantinos Agaimy, Abbas Brunner, Kathrin Mangold, Elisabeth Zenk, Johannes Iro, Heinrich Biomed Res Int Research Article Background. The prognosis of patients with advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPSCC) is generally poor. The aim of this study is to investigate the different therapeutic approaches and identify prognostic factors associated with a worse outcome for patients treated for T4a OPSCC, in order to improve treatment selection for the individual. Methods. A retrospective study was conducted on 426 patients with T4a OPC treated between 1980 and 2010. Eleven prognostic factors including treatment modality, lymph node staging, and p16 status as a surrogate marker for human papillomavirus (HPV) infection were analyzed. Results. Univariate analysis showed a significant difference in DSS between N0 and N+ (57.1% versus 26.9%, P < 0.001), primary surgical and primary nonsurgical treatment (52.7% versus 31.4%, P < 0.001), and perinodal invasion (51.7% versus 19.9%, P = 0.011). P16-negative patients tended towards a worse DSS than p16-positive patients (40.2% versus 64.6%, P = 0.126) but responded better to primary surgery than to nonsurgical treatment (71.4% versus 34.0%, P = 0.113). Multivariate analysis identified the N category as an independent prognostic factor for survival. Conclusion. The survival of p16-negative patients was worse than p16-positive patients, although they seem to respond better to primary surgery. The strongest independent prognostic factor for T4a carcinomas proved to be the presence of lymph node metastases. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3988966/ /pubmed/24800220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/390825 Text en Copyright © 2014 Georgios Psychogios et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Psychogios, Georgios Mantsopoulos, Konstantinos Agaimy, Abbas Brunner, Kathrin Mangold, Elisabeth Zenk, Johannes Iro, Heinrich Outcome and Prognostic Factors in T4a Oropharyngeal Carcinoma, Including the Role of HPV Infection |
title | Outcome and Prognostic Factors in T4a Oropharyngeal Carcinoma, Including the Role of HPV Infection |
title_full | Outcome and Prognostic Factors in T4a Oropharyngeal Carcinoma, Including the Role of HPV Infection |
title_fullStr | Outcome and Prognostic Factors in T4a Oropharyngeal Carcinoma, Including the Role of HPV Infection |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcome and Prognostic Factors in T4a Oropharyngeal Carcinoma, Including the Role of HPV Infection |
title_short | Outcome and Prognostic Factors in T4a Oropharyngeal Carcinoma, Including the Role of HPV Infection |
title_sort | outcome and prognostic factors in t4a oropharyngeal carcinoma, including the role of hpv infection |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3988966/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24800220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/390825 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT psychogiosgeorgios outcomeandprognosticfactorsint4aoropharyngealcarcinomaincludingtheroleofhpvinfection AT mantsopouloskonstantinos outcomeandprognosticfactorsint4aoropharyngealcarcinomaincludingtheroleofhpvinfection AT agaimyabbas outcomeandprognosticfactorsint4aoropharyngealcarcinomaincludingtheroleofhpvinfection AT brunnerkathrin outcomeandprognosticfactorsint4aoropharyngealcarcinomaincludingtheroleofhpvinfection AT mangoldelisabeth outcomeandprognosticfactorsint4aoropharyngealcarcinomaincludingtheroleofhpvinfection AT zenkjohannes outcomeandprognosticfactorsint4aoropharyngealcarcinomaincludingtheroleofhpvinfection AT iroheinrich outcomeandprognosticfactorsint4aoropharyngealcarcinomaincludingtheroleofhpvinfection |