Cargando…

Outcome and Prognostic Factors in T4a Oropharyngeal Carcinoma, Including the Role of HPV Infection

Background. The prognosis of patients with advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPSCC) is generally poor. The aim of this study is to investigate the different therapeutic approaches and identify prognostic factors associated with a worse outcome for patients treated for T4a OPSCC, in order to improve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Psychogios, Georgios, Mantsopoulos, Konstantinos, Agaimy, Abbas, Brunner, Kathrin, Mangold, Elisabeth, Zenk, Johannes, Iro, Heinrich
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3988966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24800220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/390825
_version_ 1782312099121201152
author Psychogios, Georgios
Mantsopoulos, Konstantinos
Agaimy, Abbas
Brunner, Kathrin
Mangold, Elisabeth
Zenk, Johannes
Iro, Heinrich
author_facet Psychogios, Georgios
Mantsopoulos, Konstantinos
Agaimy, Abbas
Brunner, Kathrin
Mangold, Elisabeth
Zenk, Johannes
Iro, Heinrich
author_sort Psychogios, Georgios
collection PubMed
description Background. The prognosis of patients with advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPSCC) is generally poor. The aim of this study is to investigate the different therapeutic approaches and identify prognostic factors associated with a worse outcome for patients treated for T4a OPSCC, in order to improve treatment selection for the individual. Methods. A retrospective study was conducted on 426 patients with T4a OPC treated between 1980 and 2010. Eleven prognostic factors including treatment modality, lymph node staging, and p16 status as a surrogate marker for human papillomavirus (HPV) infection were analyzed. Results. Univariate analysis showed a significant difference in DSS between N0 and N+ (57.1% versus 26.9%, P < 0.001), primary surgical and primary nonsurgical treatment (52.7% versus 31.4%, P < 0.001), and perinodal invasion (51.7% versus 19.9%, P = 0.011). P16-negative patients tended towards a worse DSS than p16-positive patients (40.2% versus 64.6%, P = 0.126) but responded better to primary surgery than to nonsurgical treatment (71.4% versus 34.0%, P = 0.113). Multivariate analysis identified the N category as an independent prognostic factor for survival. Conclusion. The survival of p16-negative patients was worse than p16-positive patients, although they seem to respond better to primary surgery. The strongest independent prognostic factor for T4a carcinomas proved to be the presence of lymph node metastases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3988966
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39889662014-05-05 Outcome and Prognostic Factors in T4a Oropharyngeal Carcinoma, Including the Role of HPV Infection Psychogios, Georgios Mantsopoulos, Konstantinos Agaimy, Abbas Brunner, Kathrin Mangold, Elisabeth Zenk, Johannes Iro, Heinrich Biomed Res Int Research Article Background. The prognosis of patients with advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPSCC) is generally poor. The aim of this study is to investigate the different therapeutic approaches and identify prognostic factors associated with a worse outcome for patients treated for T4a OPSCC, in order to improve treatment selection for the individual. Methods. A retrospective study was conducted on 426 patients with T4a OPC treated between 1980 and 2010. Eleven prognostic factors including treatment modality, lymph node staging, and p16 status as a surrogate marker for human papillomavirus (HPV) infection were analyzed. Results. Univariate analysis showed a significant difference in DSS between N0 and N+ (57.1% versus 26.9%, P < 0.001), primary surgical and primary nonsurgical treatment (52.7% versus 31.4%, P < 0.001), and perinodal invasion (51.7% versus 19.9%, P = 0.011). P16-negative patients tended towards a worse DSS than p16-positive patients (40.2% versus 64.6%, P = 0.126) but responded better to primary surgery than to nonsurgical treatment (71.4% versus 34.0%, P = 0.113). Multivariate analysis identified the N category as an independent prognostic factor for survival. Conclusion. The survival of p16-negative patients was worse than p16-positive patients, although they seem to respond better to primary surgery. The strongest independent prognostic factor for T4a carcinomas proved to be the presence of lymph node metastases. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3988966/ /pubmed/24800220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/390825 Text en Copyright © 2014 Georgios Psychogios et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Psychogios, Georgios
Mantsopoulos, Konstantinos
Agaimy, Abbas
Brunner, Kathrin
Mangold, Elisabeth
Zenk, Johannes
Iro, Heinrich
Outcome and Prognostic Factors in T4a Oropharyngeal Carcinoma, Including the Role of HPV Infection
title Outcome and Prognostic Factors in T4a Oropharyngeal Carcinoma, Including the Role of HPV Infection
title_full Outcome and Prognostic Factors in T4a Oropharyngeal Carcinoma, Including the Role of HPV Infection
title_fullStr Outcome and Prognostic Factors in T4a Oropharyngeal Carcinoma, Including the Role of HPV Infection
title_full_unstemmed Outcome and Prognostic Factors in T4a Oropharyngeal Carcinoma, Including the Role of HPV Infection
title_short Outcome and Prognostic Factors in T4a Oropharyngeal Carcinoma, Including the Role of HPV Infection
title_sort outcome and prognostic factors in t4a oropharyngeal carcinoma, including the role of hpv infection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3988966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24800220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/390825
work_keys_str_mv AT psychogiosgeorgios outcomeandprognosticfactorsint4aoropharyngealcarcinomaincludingtheroleofhpvinfection
AT mantsopouloskonstantinos outcomeandprognosticfactorsint4aoropharyngealcarcinomaincludingtheroleofhpvinfection
AT agaimyabbas outcomeandprognosticfactorsint4aoropharyngealcarcinomaincludingtheroleofhpvinfection
AT brunnerkathrin outcomeandprognosticfactorsint4aoropharyngealcarcinomaincludingtheroleofhpvinfection
AT mangoldelisabeth outcomeandprognosticfactorsint4aoropharyngealcarcinomaincludingtheroleofhpvinfection
AT zenkjohannes outcomeandprognosticfactorsint4aoropharyngealcarcinomaincludingtheroleofhpvinfection
AT iroheinrich outcomeandprognosticfactorsint4aoropharyngealcarcinomaincludingtheroleofhpvinfection