Cargando…
Validity of Hydration Non-Invasive Indices during the Weightcutting and Official Weigh-In for Olympic Combat Sports
BACKGROUND: In Olympic combat sports, weight cutting is a common practice aimed to take advantage of competing in weight divisions below the athlete's normal weight. Fluid and food restriction in combination with dehydration (sauna and/or exercise induced profuse sweating) are common weight cut...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3989305/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24740242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095336 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: In Olympic combat sports, weight cutting is a common practice aimed to take advantage of competing in weight divisions below the athlete's normal weight. Fluid and food restriction in combination with dehydration (sauna and/or exercise induced profuse sweating) are common weight cut methods. However, the resultant hypohydration could adversely affect health and performance outcomes. PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to determine which of the routinely used non-invasive measures of dehydration best track urine osmolality, the gold standard non-invasive test. METHOD: Immediately prior to the official weigh-in of three National Championships, the hydration status of 345 athletes of Olympic combat sports (i.e., taekwondo, boxing and wrestling) was determined using five separate techniques: i) urine osmolality (U(OSM)), ii) urine specific gravity (U(SG)), iii) urine color (U(COL)), iv) bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and v) thirst perception scale (TPS). All techniques were correlated with U(OSM) divided into three groups: euhydrated (G(1); U(OSM) 250–700 mOsm·kg H(2)O(−1)), dehydrated (G(2); U(OSM) 701–1080 mOsm·kg H(2)O(−1)), and severely dehydrated (G(3); U(OSM) 1081–1500 mOsm·kg H(2)O(−1)). RESULTS: We found a positive high correlation between the U(OSM) and U(SG) (r = 0.89: p = 0.000), although this relationship lost strength as dehydration increased (G(1) r = 0.92; G(2) r = 0.73; and G(3) r = 0.65; p = 0.000). U(COL) showed a moderate although significant correlation when considering the whole sample (r = 0.743: p = 0.000) and G(1) (r = 0.702: p = 0.000) but low correlation for the two dehydrated groups (r = 0.498–0.398). TPS and BIA showed very low correlation sizes for all groups assessed. CONCLUSION: In a wide range of pre-competitive hydration status (U(OSM) 250–1500 mOsm·kg H(2)O(−1)), U(SG) is highly associated with U(OSM) while being a more affordable and easy to use technique. U(COL) is a suitable tool when U(SG) is not available. However, BIA or TPS are not sensitive enough to detect hypohydration at official weight-in before an Olympic combat championship. |
---|