Cargando…

Should low-dose computed tomography kidneys, ureter and bladder be the new investigation of choice in suspected renal colic?: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Computed tomography kidneys, ureter and bladder (CTKUB) is the accepted gold standard investigation for suspected renal colic. Dose considerations are particularly pertinent in the context of detecting urolithiasis given the high risk of disease recurrence, which can necessitate multip...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Drake, Tamsin, Jain, Nitin, Bryant, Timothy, Wilson, Iain, Somani, Bhaskar K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3989811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24744508
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.126884
_version_ 1782312191671664640
author Drake, Tamsin
Jain, Nitin
Bryant, Timothy
Wilson, Iain
Somani, Bhaskar K.
author_facet Drake, Tamsin
Jain, Nitin
Bryant, Timothy
Wilson, Iain
Somani, Bhaskar K.
author_sort Drake, Tamsin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Computed tomography kidneys, ureter and bladder (CTKUB) is the accepted gold standard investigation for suspected renal colic. Dose considerations are particularly pertinent in the context of detecting urolithiasis given the high risk of disease recurrence, which can necessitate multiple radiological examinations over the lifetime of a stone-former. We performed a systematic review of the literature to see whether there was any evidence that reducing the effective radiation dose of a CTKUB compromised the diagnostic accuracy of the scan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Relevant databases including MedLine, EMBASE, DARE and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to October 2012. All English language articles reporting on prospective studies where non-contrast, low-dose CT (LDCT) was used to investigate adults (males and non-pregnant females) presenting with flank pain or suspected urolithiasis were included. LDCT was defined as an effective radiation dose <3 mSv per examination. RESULTS: Our initial search identified 497 records. After removing duplicates, 390 abstracts were screened, of which 375 were excluded, principally because outcomes of interest were not presented. Six papers remained for the final analysis, reporting on a total of 903 patients. Individual studies showed a prevalence of urolithiasis ranging between 36% and 88%, with additional pathologies found in 5-16%. The effective radiation dose of the LDCT techniques used ranged from 0.5 to 2.8 mSv. The sensitivity of LDCT for diagnosing stone disease was 90-97% with a specificity of 86-100%. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity and specificity of CTKUB for diagnosing urolithiasis remains high, even when the effective radiation dose is lowered. LDCT may miss some small stones (<3 mm), especially in obese patients (>30 kg/m(2)), but in this group LDCT still identifies most alternative diagnoses. With at least one level 1A and two level 1B studies supporting the use of LDCT, there is Grade A recommendation for its use as the first-line investigation in suspected renal colic in non-obese patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3989811
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39898112014-04-17 Should low-dose computed tomography kidneys, ureter and bladder be the new investigation of choice in suspected renal colic?: A systematic review Drake, Tamsin Jain, Nitin Bryant, Timothy Wilson, Iain Somani, Bhaskar K. Indian J Urol Review Article INTRODUCTION: Computed tomography kidneys, ureter and bladder (CTKUB) is the accepted gold standard investigation for suspected renal colic. Dose considerations are particularly pertinent in the context of detecting urolithiasis given the high risk of disease recurrence, which can necessitate multiple radiological examinations over the lifetime of a stone-former. We performed a systematic review of the literature to see whether there was any evidence that reducing the effective radiation dose of a CTKUB compromised the diagnostic accuracy of the scan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Relevant databases including MedLine, EMBASE, DARE and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to October 2012. All English language articles reporting on prospective studies where non-contrast, low-dose CT (LDCT) was used to investigate adults (males and non-pregnant females) presenting with flank pain or suspected urolithiasis were included. LDCT was defined as an effective radiation dose <3 mSv per examination. RESULTS: Our initial search identified 497 records. After removing duplicates, 390 abstracts were screened, of which 375 were excluded, principally because outcomes of interest were not presented. Six papers remained for the final analysis, reporting on a total of 903 patients. Individual studies showed a prevalence of urolithiasis ranging between 36% and 88%, with additional pathologies found in 5-16%. The effective radiation dose of the LDCT techniques used ranged from 0.5 to 2.8 mSv. The sensitivity of LDCT for diagnosing stone disease was 90-97% with a specificity of 86-100%. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity and specificity of CTKUB for diagnosing urolithiasis remains high, even when the effective radiation dose is lowered. LDCT may miss some small stones (<3 mm), especially in obese patients (>30 kg/m(2)), but in this group LDCT still identifies most alternative diagnoses. With at least one level 1A and two level 1B studies supporting the use of LDCT, there is Grade A recommendation for its use as the first-line investigation in suspected renal colic in non-obese patients. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC3989811/ /pubmed/24744508 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.126884 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Urology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Drake, Tamsin
Jain, Nitin
Bryant, Timothy
Wilson, Iain
Somani, Bhaskar K.
Should low-dose computed tomography kidneys, ureter and bladder be the new investigation of choice in suspected renal colic?: A systematic review
title Should low-dose computed tomography kidneys, ureter and bladder be the new investigation of choice in suspected renal colic?: A systematic review
title_full Should low-dose computed tomography kidneys, ureter and bladder be the new investigation of choice in suspected renal colic?: A systematic review
title_fullStr Should low-dose computed tomography kidneys, ureter and bladder be the new investigation of choice in suspected renal colic?: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Should low-dose computed tomography kidneys, ureter and bladder be the new investigation of choice in suspected renal colic?: A systematic review
title_short Should low-dose computed tomography kidneys, ureter and bladder be the new investigation of choice in suspected renal colic?: A systematic review
title_sort should low-dose computed tomography kidneys, ureter and bladder be the new investigation of choice in suspected renal colic?: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3989811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24744508
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.126884
work_keys_str_mv AT draketamsin shouldlowdosecomputedtomographykidneysureterandbladderbethenewinvestigationofchoiceinsuspectedrenalcolicasystematicreview
AT jainnitin shouldlowdosecomputedtomographykidneysureterandbladderbethenewinvestigationofchoiceinsuspectedrenalcolicasystematicreview
AT bryanttimothy shouldlowdosecomputedtomographykidneysureterandbladderbethenewinvestigationofchoiceinsuspectedrenalcolicasystematicreview
AT wilsoniain shouldlowdosecomputedtomographykidneysureterandbladderbethenewinvestigationofchoiceinsuspectedrenalcolicasystematicreview
AT somanibhaskark shouldlowdosecomputedtomographykidneysureterandbladderbethenewinvestigationofchoiceinsuspectedrenalcolicasystematicreview