Cargando…

Histogram Analysis of Hepatobiliary Phase MR Imaging as a Quantitative Value for Liver Cirrhosis: Preliminary Observations

PURPOSE: To investigate whether histogram analysis of the hepatobiliary phase on gadoxetate enhanced-MRI could be used as a quantitative index for determination of liver cirrhosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 63 patients [26 in a normal liver function (NLF) group and 37 in a cirrhotic group] u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Jin-Young, Kim, Honsoul, Sun, Mark, Sirlin, Claude B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3990078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24719131
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2014.55.3.651
_version_ 1782312222934958080
author Choi, Jin-Young
Kim, Honsoul
Sun, Mark
Sirlin, Claude B.
author_facet Choi, Jin-Young
Kim, Honsoul
Sun, Mark
Sirlin, Claude B.
author_sort Choi, Jin-Young
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate whether histogram analysis of the hepatobiliary phase on gadoxetate enhanced-MRI could be used as a quantitative index for determination of liver cirrhosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 63 patients [26 in a normal liver function (NLF) group and 37 in a cirrhotic group] underwent gadoxetate-enhanced MRI, and hepatobiliary phase images were obtained at 20 minutes after contrast injection. The signal intensity of the hepatic parenchyma was measured at four different regions of interest (ROI) of the liver, avoiding vessels and bile ducts. Standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), and corrected CV were calculated on the histograms at the ROIs. The distributions of CVs calculated from the ROI histogram were examined and statistical analysis was carried out. RESULTS: The CV value was 0.041±0.009 (mean CV±SD) in the NLF group, while that of cirrhotic group was 0.071±0.020. There were statistically significant differences in the CVs and corrected CV values between the NLF and cirrhotic groups (p<0.001). The most accurate cut-off value among CVs for distinguishing normal from cirrhotic group was 0.052 (sensitivity 83.8% and specificity 88.5%). There was no statistically significant differences in SD between NLF and cirrhotic groups (p=0.307). CONCLUSION: The CV of histograms of the hepatobiliary phase on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI may be useful as a quantitative value for determining the presence of liver cirrhosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3990078
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Yonsei University College of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39900782014-05-01 Histogram Analysis of Hepatobiliary Phase MR Imaging as a Quantitative Value for Liver Cirrhosis: Preliminary Observations Choi, Jin-Young Kim, Honsoul Sun, Mark Sirlin, Claude B. Yonsei Med J Original Article PURPOSE: To investigate whether histogram analysis of the hepatobiliary phase on gadoxetate enhanced-MRI could be used as a quantitative index for determination of liver cirrhosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 63 patients [26 in a normal liver function (NLF) group and 37 in a cirrhotic group] underwent gadoxetate-enhanced MRI, and hepatobiliary phase images were obtained at 20 minutes after contrast injection. The signal intensity of the hepatic parenchyma was measured at four different regions of interest (ROI) of the liver, avoiding vessels and bile ducts. Standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), and corrected CV were calculated on the histograms at the ROIs. The distributions of CVs calculated from the ROI histogram were examined and statistical analysis was carried out. RESULTS: The CV value was 0.041±0.009 (mean CV±SD) in the NLF group, while that of cirrhotic group was 0.071±0.020. There were statistically significant differences in the CVs and corrected CV values between the NLF and cirrhotic groups (p<0.001). The most accurate cut-off value among CVs for distinguishing normal from cirrhotic group was 0.052 (sensitivity 83.8% and specificity 88.5%). There was no statistically significant differences in SD between NLF and cirrhotic groups (p=0.307). CONCLUSION: The CV of histograms of the hepatobiliary phase on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI may be useful as a quantitative value for determining the presence of liver cirrhosis. Yonsei University College of Medicine 2014-05-01 2014-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3990078/ /pubmed/24719131 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2014.55.3.651 Text en © Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Choi, Jin-Young
Kim, Honsoul
Sun, Mark
Sirlin, Claude B.
Histogram Analysis of Hepatobiliary Phase MR Imaging as a Quantitative Value for Liver Cirrhosis: Preliminary Observations
title Histogram Analysis of Hepatobiliary Phase MR Imaging as a Quantitative Value for Liver Cirrhosis: Preliminary Observations
title_full Histogram Analysis of Hepatobiliary Phase MR Imaging as a Quantitative Value for Liver Cirrhosis: Preliminary Observations
title_fullStr Histogram Analysis of Hepatobiliary Phase MR Imaging as a Quantitative Value for Liver Cirrhosis: Preliminary Observations
title_full_unstemmed Histogram Analysis of Hepatobiliary Phase MR Imaging as a Quantitative Value for Liver Cirrhosis: Preliminary Observations
title_short Histogram Analysis of Hepatobiliary Phase MR Imaging as a Quantitative Value for Liver Cirrhosis: Preliminary Observations
title_sort histogram analysis of hepatobiliary phase mr imaging as a quantitative value for liver cirrhosis: preliminary observations
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3990078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24719131
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2014.55.3.651
work_keys_str_mv AT choijinyoung histogramanalysisofhepatobiliaryphasemrimagingasaquantitativevalueforlivercirrhosispreliminaryobservations
AT kimhonsoul histogramanalysisofhepatobiliaryphasemrimagingasaquantitativevalueforlivercirrhosispreliminaryobservations
AT sunmark histogramanalysisofhepatobiliaryphasemrimagingasaquantitativevalueforlivercirrhosispreliminaryobservations
AT sirlinclaudeb histogramanalysisofhepatobiliaryphasemrimagingasaquantitativevalueforlivercirrhosispreliminaryobservations