Cargando…

Distribution of the radiation dose in multislice computer tomography of the chest – phantom study

BACKGROUND: The most commonly used form of reporting doses in multislice computed tomography involves a CT dose index per slice and dose-length product for the whole series. The purpose of this study was to analyze the actual dose distribution in routine chest CT examination protocols using an antro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gorycki, Tomasz, Kamiński, Kamil, Studniarek, Michał, Szlęzak, Przemysław, Szumska, Agnieszka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3990109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24744819
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/PJR.889951
_version_ 1782312230081003520
author Gorycki, Tomasz
Kamiński, Kamil
Studniarek, Michał
Szlęzak, Przemysław
Szumska, Agnieszka
author_facet Gorycki, Tomasz
Kamiński, Kamil
Studniarek, Michał
Szlęzak, Przemysław
Szumska, Agnieszka
author_sort Gorycki, Tomasz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The most commonly used form of reporting doses in multislice computed tomography involves a CT dose index per slice and dose-length product for the whole series. The purpose of this study was to analyze the actual dose distribution in routine chest CT examination protocols using an antropomorphic phantom. MATERIAL/METHODS: We included in the analysis readings from a phantom filled with thermoluminescent detectors (Art Phantom Canberra) during routine chest CT examinations (64 MDCT TK LIGHT SPEED GE Medical System) performed using three protocols: low-dose, helical and angio-CT. RESULTS: Mean dose values (mSv) reported from anterior parts of the phantom sections in low-dose/helical/angio-CT protocols were as follows: 3.74; 16.95; 30.17; from central parts: 3.18; 14.15; 26.71; from posterior parts: 3.01; 12.47; 24.98 respectively. Correlation coefficients for mean doses registered in anterior parts of the phantom between low-dose/helical, low-dose/angio-CT and helical/angio-CT protocols were 0.49; 0.63; 0.36; from central parts: 0.73; 0.66; 0.83, while in posterior parts values were as follows: 0.06; 0.21; 0.57. CONCLUSIONS: The greatest doses were recorded in anterior parts of all phantom sections in all protocols in reference to largest doses absorbed in the anterior part of the chest during CT examination. The doses were decreasing from anterior to posterior parts of all sections. In the long axis of the phantom, in all protocols, lower doses were measured in the upper part of the phantom and at the very lowest part.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3990109
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39901092014-04-17 Distribution of the radiation dose in multislice computer tomography of the chest – phantom study Gorycki, Tomasz Kamiński, Kamil Studniarek, Michał Szlęzak, Przemysław Szumska, Agnieszka Pol J Radiol Original Article BACKGROUND: The most commonly used form of reporting doses in multislice computed tomography involves a CT dose index per slice and dose-length product for the whole series. The purpose of this study was to analyze the actual dose distribution in routine chest CT examination protocols using an antropomorphic phantom. MATERIAL/METHODS: We included in the analysis readings from a phantom filled with thermoluminescent detectors (Art Phantom Canberra) during routine chest CT examinations (64 MDCT TK LIGHT SPEED GE Medical System) performed using three protocols: low-dose, helical and angio-CT. RESULTS: Mean dose values (mSv) reported from anterior parts of the phantom sections in low-dose/helical/angio-CT protocols were as follows: 3.74; 16.95; 30.17; from central parts: 3.18; 14.15; 26.71; from posterior parts: 3.01; 12.47; 24.98 respectively. Correlation coefficients for mean doses registered in anterior parts of the phantom between low-dose/helical, low-dose/angio-CT and helical/angio-CT protocols were 0.49; 0.63; 0.36; from central parts: 0.73; 0.66; 0.83, while in posterior parts values were as follows: 0.06; 0.21; 0.57. CONCLUSIONS: The greatest doses were recorded in anterior parts of all phantom sections in all protocols in reference to largest doses absorbed in the anterior part of the chest during CT examination. The doses were decreasing from anterior to posterior parts of all sections. In the long axis of the phantom, in all protocols, lower doses were measured in the upper part of the phantom and at the very lowest part. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2014-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3990109/ /pubmed/24744819 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/PJR.889951 Text en © Pol J Radiol, 2014 This is an open access article. Unrestricted non-commercial use is permitted provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gorycki, Tomasz
Kamiński, Kamil
Studniarek, Michał
Szlęzak, Przemysław
Szumska, Agnieszka
Distribution of the radiation dose in multislice computer tomography of the chest – phantom study
title Distribution of the radiation dose in multislice computer tomography of the chest – phantom study
title_full Distribution of the radiation dose in multislice computer tomography of the chest – phantom study
title_fullStr Distribution of the radiation dose in multislice computer tomography of the chest – phantom study
title_full_unstemmed Distribution of the radiation dose in multislice computer tomography of the chest – phantom study
title_short Distribution of the radiation dose in multislice computer tomography of the chest – phantom study
title_sort distribution of the radiation dose in multislice computer tomography of the chest – phantom study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3990109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24744819
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/PJR.889951
work_keys_str_mv AT goryckitomasz distributionoftheradiationdoseinmultislicecomputertomographyofthechestphantomstudy
AT kaminskikamil distributionoftheradiationdoseinmultislicecomputertomographyofthechestphantomstudy
AT studniarekmichał distributionoftheradiationdoseinmultislicecomputertomographyofthechestphantomstudy
AT szlezakprzemysław distributionoftheradiationdoseinmultislicecomputertomographyofthechestphantomstudy
AT szumskaagnieszka distributionoftheradiationdoseinmultislicecomputertomographyofthechestphantomstudy