Cargando…
Distribution of the radiation dose in multislice computer tomography of the chest – phantom study
BACKGROUND: The most commonly used form of reporting doses in multislice computed tomography involves a CT dose index per slice and dose-length product for the whole series. The purpose of this study was to analyze the actual dose distribution in routine chest CT examination protocols using an antro...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Scientific Literature, Inc.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3990109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24744819 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/PJR.889951 |
_version_ | 1782312230081003520 |
---|---|
author | Gorycki, Tomasz Kamiński, Kamil Studniarek, Michał Szlęzak, Przemysław Szumska, Agnieszka |
author_facet | Gorycki, Tomasz Kamiński, Kamil Studniarek, Michał Szlęzak, Przemysław Szumska, Agnieszka |
author_sort | Gorycki, Tomasz |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The most commonly used form of reporting doses in multislice computed tomography involves a CT dose index per slice and dose-length product for the whole series. The purpose of this study was to analyze the actual dose distribution in routine chest CT examination protocols using an antropomorphic phantom. MATERIAL/METHODS: We included in the analysis readings from a phantom filled with thermoluminescent detectors (Art Phantom Canberra) during routine chest CT examinations (64 MDCT TK LIGHT SPEED GE Medical System) performed using three protocols: low-dose, helical and angio-CT. RESULTS: Mean dose values (mSv) reported from anterior parts of the phantom sections in low-dose/helical/angio-CT protocols were as follows: 3.74; 16.95; 30.17; from central parts: 3.18; 14.15; 26.71; from posterior parts: 3.01; 12.47; 24.98 respectively. Correlation coefficients for mean doses registered in anterior parts of the phantom between low-dose/helical, low-dose/angio-CT and helical/angio-CT protocols were 0.49; 0.63; 0.36; from central parts: 0.73; 0.66; 0.83, while in posterior parts values were as follows: 0.06; 0.21; 0.57. CONCLUSIONS: The greatest doses were recorded in anterior parts of all phantom sections in all protocols in reference to largest doses absorbed in the anterior part of the chest during CT examination. The doses were decreasing from anterior to posterior parts of all sections. In the long axis of the phantom, in all protocols, lower doses were measured in the upper part of the phantom and at the very lowest part. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3990109 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | International Scientific Literature, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39901092014-04-17 Distribution of the radiation dose in multislice computer tomography of the chest – phantom study Gorycki, Tomasz Kamiński, Kamil Studniarek, Michał Szlęzak, Przemysław Szumska, Agnieszka Pol J Radiol Original Article BACKGROUND: The most commonly used form of reporting doses in multislice computed tomography involves a CT dose index per slice and dose-length product for the whole series. The purpose of this study was to analyze the actual dose distribution in routine chest CT examination protocols using an antropomorphic phantom. MATERIAL/METHODS: We included in the analysis readings from a phantom filled with thermoluminescent detectors (Art Phantom Canberra) during routine chest CT examinations (64 MDCT TK LIGHT SPEED GE Medical System) performed using three protocols: low-dose, helical and angio-CT. RESULTS: Mean dose values (mSv) reported from anterior parts of the phantom sections in low-dose/helical/angio-CT protocols were as follows: 3.74; 16.95; 30.17; from central parts: 3.18; 14.15; 26.71; from posterior parts: 3.01; 12.47; 24.98 respectively. Correlation coefficients for mean doses registered in anterior parts of the phantom between low-dose/helical, low-dose/angio-CT and helical/angio-CT protocols were 0.49; 0.63; 0.36; from central parts: 0.73; 0.66; 0.83, while in posterior parts values were as follows: 0.06; 0.21; 0.57. CONCLUSIONS: The greatest doses were recorded in anterior parts of all phantom sections in all protocols in reference to largest doses absorbed in the anterior part of the chest during CT examination. The doses were decreasing from anterior to posterior parts of all sections. In the long axis of the phantom, in all protocols, lower doses were measured in the upper part of the phantom and at the very lowest part. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2014-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3990109/ /pubmed/24744819 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/PJR.889951 Text en © Pol J Radiol, 2014 This is an open access article. Unrestricted non-commercial use is permitted provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Gorycki, Tomasz Kamiński, Kamil Studniarek, Michał Szlęzak, Przemysław Szumska, Agnieszka Distribution of the radiation dose in multislice computer tomography of the chest – phantom study |
title | Distribution of the radiation dose in multislice computer tomography of the chest – phantom study |
title_full | Distribution of the radiation dose in multislice computer tomography of the chest – phantom study |
title_fullStr | Distribution of the radiation dose in multislice computer tomography of the chest – phantom study |
title_full_unstemmed | Distribution of the radiation dose in multislice computer tomography of the chest – phantom study |
title_short | Distribution of the radiation dose in multislice computer tomography of the chest – phantom study |
title_sort | distribution of the radiation dose in multislice computer tomography of the chest – phantom study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3990109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24744819 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/PJR.889951 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goryckitomasz distributionoftheradiationdoseinmultislicecomputertomographyofthechestphantomstudy AT kaminskikamil distributionoftheradiationdoseinmultislicecomputertomographyofthechestphantomstudy AT studniarekmichał distributionoftheradiationdoseinmultislicecomputertomographyofthechestphantomstudy AT szlezakprzemysław distributionoftheradiationdoseinmultislicecomputertomographyofthechestphantomstudy AT szumskaagnieszka distributionoftheradiationdoseinmultislicecomputertomographyofthechestphantomstudy |