Cargando…

Allergic sensitization: screening methods

Experimental in silico, in vitro, and rodent models for screening and predicting protein sensitizing potential are discussed, including whether there is evidence of new sensitizations and allergies since the introduction of genetically modified crops in 1996, the importance of linear versus conforma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ladics, Gregory S, Fry, Jeremy, Goodman, Richard, Herouet-Guicheney, Corinne, Hoffmann-Sommergruber, Karin, Madsen, Charlotte B, Penninks, André, Pomés, Anna, Roggen, Erwin L, Smit, Joost, Wal, Jean-Michel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3990213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24739743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-7022-4-13
_version_ 1782312248656527360
author Ladics, Gregory S
Fry, Jeremy
Goodman, Richard
Herouet-Guicheney, Corinne
Hoffmann-Sommergruber, Karin
Madsen, Charlotte B
Penninks, André
Pomés, Anna
Roggen, Erwin L
Smit, Joost
Wal, Jean-Michel
author_facet Ladics, Gregory S
Fry, Jeremy
Goodman, Richard
Herouet-Guicheney, Corinne
Hoffmann-Sommergruber, Karin
Madsen, Charlotte B
Penninks, André
Pomés, Anna
Roggen, Erwin L
Smit, Joost
Wal, Jean-Michel
author_sort Ladics, Gregory S
collection PubMed
description Experimental in silico, in vitro, and rodent models for screening and predicting protein sensitizing potential are discussed, including whether there is evidence of new sensitizations and allergies since the introduction of genetically modified crops in 1996, the importance of linear versus conformational epitopes, and protein families that become allergens. Some common challenges for predicting protein sensitization are addressed: (a) exposure routes; (b) frequency and dose of exposure; (c) dose-response relationships; (d) role of digestion, food processing, and the food matrix; (e) role of infection; (f) role of the gut microbiota; (g) influence of the structure and physicochemical properties of the protein; and (h) the genetic background and physiology of consumers. The consensus view is that sensitization screening models are not yet validated to definitively predict the de novo sensitizing potential of a novel protein. However, they would be extremely useful in the discovery and research phases of understanding the mechanisms of food allergy development, and may prove fruitful to provide information regarding potential allergenicity risk assessment of future products on a case by case basis. These data and findings were presented at a 2012 international symposium in Prague organized by the Protein Allergenicity Technical Committee of the International Life Sciences Institute’s Health and Environmental Sciences Institute.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3990213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39902132014-04-18 Allergic sensitization: screening methods Ladics, Gregory S Fry, Jeremy Goodman, Richard Herouet-Guicheney, Corinne Hoffmann-Sommergruber, Karin Madsen, Charlotte B Penninks, André Pomés, Anna Roggen, Erwin L Smit, Joost Wal, Jean-Michel Clin Transl Allergy Review Experimental in silico, in vitro, and rodent models for screening and predicting protein sensitizing potential are discussed, including whether there is evidence of new sensitizations and allergies since the introduction of genetically modified crops in 1996, the importance of linear versus conformational epitopes, and protein families that become allergens. Some common challenges for predicting protein sensitization are addressed: (a) exposure routes; (b) frequency and dose of exposure; (c) dose-response relationships; (d) role of digestion, food processing, and the food matrix; (e) role of infection; (f) role of the gut microbiota; (g) influence of the structure and physicochemical properties of the protein; and (h) the genetic background and physiology of consumers. The consensus view is that sensitization screening models are not yet validated to definitively predict the de novo sensitizing potential of a novel protein. However, they would be extremely useful in the discovery and research phases of understanding the mechanisms of food allergy development, and may prove fruitful to provide information regarding potential allergenicity risk assessment of future products on a case by case basis. These data and findings were presented at a 2012 international symposium in Prague organized by the Protein Allergenicity Technical Committee of the International Life Sciences Institute’s Health and Environmental Sciences Institute. BioMed Central 2014-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3990213/ /pubmed/24739743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-7022-4-13 Text en Copyright © 2014 Ladics et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Ladics, Gregory S
Fry, Jeremy
Goodman, Richard
Herouet-Guicheney, Corinne
Hoffmann-Sommergruber, Karin
Madsen, Charlotte B
Penninks, André
Pomés, Anna
Roggen, Erwin L
Smit, Joost
Wal, Jean-Michel
Allergic sensitization: screening methods
title Allergic sensitization: screening methods
title_full Allergic sensitization: screening methods
title_fullStr Allergic sensitization: screening methods
title_full_unstemmed Allergic sensitization: screening methods
title_short Allergic sensitization: screening methods
title_sort allergic sensitization: screening methods
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3990213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24739743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-7022-4-13
work_keys_str_mv AT ladicsgregorys allergicsensitizationscreeningmethods
AT fryjeremy allergicsensitizationscreeningmethods
AT goodmanrichard allergicsensitizationscreeningmethods
AT herouetguicheneycorinne allergicsensitizationscreeningmethods
AT hoffmannsommergruberkarin allergicsensitizationscreeningmethods
AT madsencharlotteb allergicsensitizationscreeningmethods
AT penninksandre allergicsensitizationscreeningmethods
AT pomesanna allergicsensitizationscreeningmethods
AT roggenerwinl allergicsensitizationscreeningmethods
AT smitjoost allergicsensitizationscreeningmethods
AT waljeanmichel allergicsensitizationscreeningmethods