Cargando…

Shared Sanitation versus Individual Household Latrines: A Systematic Review of Health Outcomes

BACKGROUND: More than 761 million people rely on shared sanitation facilities. These have historically been excluded from international sanitation targets, regardless of the service level, due to concerns about acceptability, hygiene and access. In connection with a proposed change in such policy, w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heijnen, Marieke, Cumming, Oliver, Peletz, Rachel, Chan, Gabrielle Ka-Seen, Brown, Joe, Baker, Kelly, Clasen, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3990518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24743336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093300
_version_ 1782312293290213376
author Heijnen, Marieke
Cumming, Oliver
Peletz, Rachel
Chan, Gabrielle Ka-Seen
Brown, Joe
Baker, Kelly
Clasen, Thomas
author_facet Heijnen, Marieke
Cumming, Oliver
Peletz, Rachel
Chan, Gabrielle Ka-Seen
Brown, Joe
Baker, Kelly
Clasen, Thomas
author_sort Heijnen, Marieke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: More than 761 million people rely on shared sanitation facilities. These have historically been excluded from international sanitation targets, regardless of the service level, due to concerns about acceptability, hygiene and access. In connection with a proposed change in such policy, we undertook this review to identify and summarize existing evidence that compares health outcomes associated with shared sanitation versus individual household latrines. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Shared sanitation included any type of facilities intended for the containment of human faeces and used by more than one household, but excluded public facilities. Health outcomes included diarrhoea, helminth infections, enteric fevers, other faecal-oral diseases, trachoma and adverse maternal or birth outcomes. Studies were included regardless of design, location, language or publication status. Studies were assessed for methodological quality using the STROBE guidelines. Twenty-two studies conducted in 21 countries met the inclusion criteria. Studies show a pattern of increased risk of adverse health outcomes associated with shared sanitation compared to individual household latrines. A meta-analysis of 12 studies reporting on diarrhoea found increased odds of disease associated with reliance on shared sanitation (odds ratio (OR) 1.44, 95% CI: 1.18–1.76). CONCLUSION: Evidence to date does not support a change of existing policy of excluding shared sanitation from the definition of improved sanitation used in international monitoring and targets. However, such evidence is limited, does not adequately address likely confounding, and does not identify potentially important distinctions among types of shared facilities. As reliance on shared sanitation is increasing, further research is necessary to determine the circumstances, if any, under which shared sanitation can offer a safe, appropriate and acceptable alternative to individual household latrines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3990518
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39905182014-04-21 Shared Sanitation versus Individual Household Latrines: A Systematic Review of Health Outcomes Heijnen, Marieke Cumming, Oliver Peletz, Rachel Chan, Gabrielle Ka-Seen Brown, Joe Baker, Kelly Clasen, Thomas PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: More than 761 million people rely on shared sanitation facilities. These have historically been excluded from international sanitation targets, regardless of the service level, due to concerns about acceptability, hygiene and access. In connection with a proposed change in such policy, we undertook this review to identify and summarize existing evidence that compares health outcomes associated with shared sanitation versus individual household latrines. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Shared sanitation included any type of facilities intended for the containment of human faeces and used by more than one household, but excluded public facilities. Health outcomes included diarrhoea, helminth infections, enteric fevers, other faecal-oral diseases, trachoma and adverse maternal or birth outcomes. Studies were included regardless of design, location, language or publication status. Studies were assessed for methodological quality using the STROBE guidelines. Twenty-two studies conducted in 21 countries met the inclusion criteria. Studies show a pattern of increased risk of adverse health outcomes associated with shared sanitation compared to individual household latrines. A meta-analysis of 12 studies reporting on diarrhoea found increased odds of disease associated with reliance on shared sanitation (odds ratio (OR) 1.44, 95% CI: 1.18–1.76). CONCLUSION: Evidence to date does not support a change of existing policy of excluding shared sanitation from the definition of improved sanitation used in international monitoring and targets. However, such evidence is limited, does not adequately address likely confounding, and does not identify potentially important distinctions among types of shared facilities. As reliance on shared sanitation is increasing, further research is necessary to determine the circumstances, if any, under which shared sanitation can offer a safe, appropriate and acceptable alternative to individual household latrines. Public Library of Science 2014-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3990518/ /pubmed/24743336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093300 Text en © 2014 Heijnen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Heijnen, Marieke
Cumming, Oliver
Peletz, Rachel
Chan, Gabrielle Ka-Seen
Brown, Joe
Baker, Kelly
Clasen, Thomas
Shared Sanitation versus Individual Household Latrines: A Systematic Review of Health Outcomes
title Shared Sanitation versus Individual Household Latrines: A Systematic Review of Health Outcomes
title_full Shared Sanitation versus Individual Household Latrines: A Systematic Review of Health Outcomes
title_fullStr Shared Sanitation versus Individual Household Latrines: A Systematic Review of Health Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Shared Sanitation versus Individual Household Latrines: A Systematic Review of Health Outcomes
title_short Shared Sanitation versus Individual Household Latrines: A Systematic Review of Health Outcomes
title_sort shared sanitation versus individual household latrines: a systematic review of health outcomes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3990518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24743336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093300
work_keys_str_mv AT heijnenmarieke sharedsanitationversusindividualhouseholdlatrinesasystematicreviewofhealthoutcomes
AT cummingoliver sharedsanitationversusindividualhouseholdlatrinesasystematicreviewofhealthoutcomes
AT peletzrachel sharedsanitationversusindividualhouseholdlatrinesasystematicreviewofhealthoutcomes
AT changabriellekaseen sharedsanitationversusindividualhouseholdlatrinesasystematicreviewofhealthoutcomes
AT brownjoe sharedsanitationversusindividualhouseholdlatrinesasystematicreviewofhealthoutcomes
AT bakerkelly sharedsanitationversusindividualhouseholdlatrinesasystematicreviewofhealthoutcomes
AT clasenthomas sharedsanitationversusindividualhouseholdlatrinesasystematicreviewofhealthoutcomes