Cargando…
Meta-Analysis: Narrow Band Imaging for Diagnosis of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia
BACKGROUND: Distinguishing early gastric cancer is challenging with current imaging techniques. Narrow band imaging (NBI) is effective for characterizing gastric lesions. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this meta-analysis was to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of NBI in the gastric intestinal metaplasia (GI...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3990530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24743566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094869 |
_version_ | 1782312296067891200 |
---|---|
author | Song, Jia Zhang, Jixiang Wang, Jun Guo, Xufeng Wang, Jing Liu, Ya Dong, Weiguo |
author_facet | Song, Jia Zhang, Jixiang Wang, Jun Guo, Xufeng Wang, Jing Liu, Ya Dong, Weiguo |
author_sort | Song, Jia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Distinguishing early gastric cancer is challenging with current imaging techniques. Narrow band imaging (NBI) is effective for characterizing gastric lesions. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this meta-analysis was to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of NBI in the gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM). METHODS: We performed data analysis using Meta-DiSc (version 1.4) and STATA (version 11.0) software. To assess study quality and potential for bias, we used the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. RESULTS: Six studies involving 347 patients were included. On a per-patient basis, the sensitivity of NBI for diagnosis of GIM was 0.65 (95% CI = 0.56–0.74), and the specificity was 0.93 (95% CI = 0.88–0.97). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was 0.8731. However, on a per-lesion basis, the sensitivity and specificity of NBI were 0.69 (95% CI = 0.63–0.74) and 0.91 (95% CI = 0.87–0.94), respectively. The SROC was 0.9009. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of magnification endoscopy (NBI-ME) were 0.76 (95% CI = 0.61–0.87) and 0.89 (95% CI = 0.80–0.94), respectively, on per-patient analysis. On a per-lesion basis, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of NBI-ME were 0.84 (95% CI = 0.76–0.89) and 0.93 (95% CI = 0.89–0.96), respectively. Heterogeneity was observed with an I(2) for diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 0.01% and 85.8%, respectively. There was no statistical significance for the evaluation of publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis shows that NBI is a useful tool for differential diagnosis of GIM with relatively low sensitivity and high specificity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3990530 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39905302014-04-21 Meta-Analysis: Narrow Band Imaging for Diagnosis of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia Song, Jia Zhang, Jixiang Wang, Jun Guo, Xufeng Wang, Jing Liu, Ya Dong, Weiguo PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Distinguishing early gastric cancer is challenging with current imaging techniques. Narrow band imaging (NBI) is effective for characterizing gastric lesions. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this meta-analysis was to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of NBI in the gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM). METHODS: We performed data analysis using Meta-DiSc (version 1.4) and STATA (version 11.0) software. To assess study quality and potential for bias, we used the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. RESULTS: Six studies involving 347 patients were included. On a per-patient basis, the sensitivity of NBI for diagnosis of GIM was 0.65 (95% CI = 0.56–0.74), and the specificity was 0.93 (95% CI = 0.88–0.97). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was 0.8731. However, on a per-lesion basis, the sensitivity and specificity of NBI were 0.69 (95% CI = 0.63–0.74) and 0.91 (95% CI = 0.87–0.94), respectively. The SROC was 0.9009. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of magnification endoscopy (NBI-ME) were 0.76 (95% CI = 0.61–0.87) and 0.89 (95% CI = 0.80–0.94), respectively, on per-patient analysis. On a per-lesion basis, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of NBI-ME were 0.84 (95% CI = 0.76–0.89) and 0.93 (95% CI = 0.89–0.96), respectively. Heterogeneity was observed with an I(2) for diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 0.01% and 85.8%, respectively. There was no statistical significance for the evaluation of publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis shows that NBI is a useful tool for differential diagnosis of GIM with relatively low sensitivity and high specificity. Public Library of Science 2014-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3990530/ /pubmed/24743566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094869 Text en © 2014 Song et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Song, Jia Zhang, Jixiang Wang, Jun Guo, Xufeng Wang, Jing Liu, Ya Dong, Weiguo Meta-Analysis: Narrow Band Imaging for Diagnosis of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia |
title | Meta-Analysis: Narrow Band Imaging for Diagnosis of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia |
title_full | Meta-Analysis: Narrow Band Imaging for Diagnosis of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia |
title_fullStr | Meta-Analysis: Narrow Band Imaging for Diagnosis of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia |
title_full_unstemmed | Meta-Analysis: Narrow Band Imaging for Diagnosis of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia |
title_short | Meta-Analysis: Narrow Band Imaging for Diagnosis of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia |
title_sort | meta-analysis: narrow band imaging for diagnosis of gastric intestinal metaplasia |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3990530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24743566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094869 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT songjia metaanalysisnarrowbandimagingfordiagnosisofgastricintestinalmetaplasia AT zhangjixiang metaanalysisnarrowbandimagingfordiagnosisofgastricintestinalmetaplasia AT wangjun metaanalysisnarrowbandimagingfordiagnosisofgastricintestinalmetaplasia AT guoxufeng metaanalysisnarrowbandimagingfordiagnosisofgastricintestinalmetaplasia AT wangjing metaanalysisnarrowbandimagingfordiagnosisofgastricintestinalmetaplasia AT liuya metaanalysisnarrowbandimagingfordiagnosisofgastricintestinalmetaplasia AT dongweiguo metaanalysisnarrowbandimagingfordiagnosisofgastricintestinalmetaplasia |