Cargando…

Meta-Analysis: Narrow Band Imaging for Diagnosis of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia

BACKGROUND: Distinguishing early gastric cancer is challenging with current imaging techniques. Narrow band imaging (NBI) is effective for characterizing gastric lesions. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this meta-analysis was to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of NBI in the gastric intestinal metaplasia (GI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Jia, Zhang, Jixiang, Wang, Jun, Guo, Xufeng, Wang, Jing, Liu, Ya, Dong, Weiguo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3990530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24743566
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094869
_version_ 1782312296067891200
author Song, Jia
Zhang, Jixiang
Wang, Jun
Guo, Xufeng
Wang, Jing
Liu, Ya
Dong, Weiguo
author_facet Song, Jia
Zhang, Jixiang
Wang, Jun
Guo, Xufeng
Wang, Jing
Liu, Ya
Dong, Weiguo
author_sort Song, Jia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Distinguishing early gastric cancer is challenging with current imaging techniques. Narrow band imaging (NBI) is effective for characterizing gastric lesions. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this meta-analysis was to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of NBI in the gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM). METHODS: We performed data analysis using Meta-DiSc (version 1.4) and STATA (version 11.0) software. To assess study quality and potential for bias, we used the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. RESULTS: Six studies involving 347 patients were included. On a per-patient basis, the sensitivity of NBI for diagnosis of GIM was 0.65 (95% CI  =  0.56–0.74), and the specificity was 0.93 (95% CI  =  0.88–0.97). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was 0.8731. However, on a per-lesion basis, the sensitivity and specificity of NBI were 0.69 (95% CI  =  0.63–0.74) and 0.91 (95% CI  =  0.87–0.94), respectively. The SROC was 0.9009. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of magnification endoscopy (NBI-ME) were 0.76 (95% CI  =  0.61–0.87) and 0.89 (95% CI  =  0.80–0.94), respectively, on per-patient analysis. On a per-lesion basis, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of NBI-ME were 0.84 (95% CI  =  0.76–0.89) and 0.93 (95% CI  =  0.89–0.96), respectively. Heterogeneity was observed with an I(2) for diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 0.01% and 85.8%, respectively. There was no statistical significance for the evaluation of publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis shows that NBI is a useful tool for differential diagnosis of GIM with relatively low sensitivity and high specificity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3990530
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39905302014-04-21 Meta-Analysis: Narrow Band Imaging for Diagnosis of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia Song, Jia Zhang, Jixiang Wang, Jun Guo, Xufeng Wang, Jing Liu, Ya Dong, Weiguo PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Distinguishing early gastric cancer is challenging with current imaging techniques. Narrow band imaging (NBI) is effective for characterizing gastric lesions. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this meta-analysis was to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of NBI in the gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM). METHODS: We performed data analysis using Meta-DiSc (version 1.4) and STATA (version 11.0) software. To assess study quality and potential for bias, we used the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. RESULTS: Six studies involving 347 patients were included. On a per-patient basis, the sensitivity of NBI for diagnosis of GIM was 0.65 (95% CI  =  0.56–0.74), and the specificity was 0.93 (95% CI  =  0.88–0.97). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was 0.8731. However, on a per-lesion basis, the sensitivity and specificity of NBI were 0.69 (95% CI  =  0.63–0.74) and 0.91 (95% CI  =  0.87–0.94), respectively. The SROC was 0.9009. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of magnification endoscopy (NBI-ME) were 0.76 (95% CI  =  0.61–0.87) and 0.89 (95% CI  =  0.80–0.94), respectively, on per-patient analysis. On a per-lesion basis, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of NBI-ME were 0.84 (95% CI  =  0.76–0.89) and 0.93 (95% CI  =  0.89–0.96), respectively. Heterogeneity was observed with an I(2) for diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 0.01% and 85.8%, respectively. There was no statistical significance for the evaluation of publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis shows that NBI is a useful tool for differential diagnosis of GIM with relatively low sensitivity and high specificity. Public Library of Science 2014-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3990530/ /pubmed/24743566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094869 Text en © 2014 Song et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Song, Jia
Zhang, Jixiang
Wang, Jun
Guo, Xufeng
Wang, Jing
Liu, Ya
Dong, Weiguo
Meta-Analysis: Narrow Band Imaging for Diagnosis of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia
title Meta-Analysis: Narrow Band Imaging for Diagnosis of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia
title_full Meta-Analysis: Narrow Band Imaging for Diagnosis of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia
title_fullStr Meta-Analysis: Narrow Band Imaging for Diagnosis of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia
title_full_unstemmed Meta-Analysis: Narrow Band Imaging for Diagnosis of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia
title_short Meta-Analysis: Narrow Band Imaging for Diagnosis of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia
title_sort meta-analysis: narrow band imaging for diagnosis of gastric intestinal metaplasia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3990530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24743566
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094869
work_keys_str_mv AT songjia metaanalysisnarrowbandimagingfordiagnosisofgastricintestinalmetaplasia
AT zhangjixiang metaanalysisnarrowbandimagingfordiagnosisofgastricintestinalmetaplasia
AT wangjun metaanalysisnarrowbandimagingfordiagnosisofgastricintestinalmetaplasia
AT guoxufeng metaanalysisnarrowbandimagingfordiagnosisofgastricintestinalmetaplasia
AT wangjing metaanalysisnarrowbandimagingfordiagnosisofgastricintestinalmetaplasia
AT liuya metaanalysisnarrowbandimagingfordiagnosisofgastricintestinalmetaplasia
AT dongweiguo metaanalysisnarrowbandimagingfordiagnosisofgastricintestinalmetaplasia