Cargando…
The Trajectory of Dispersal Research in Conservation Biology. Systematic Review
Dispersal knowledge is essential for conservation management, and demand is growing. But are we accumulating dispersal knowledge at a pace that can meet the demand? To answer this question we tested for changes in dispersal data collection and use over time. Our systematic review of 655 conservation...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3990620/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24743447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095053 |
_version_ | 1782312314342473728 |
---|---|
author | Driscoll, Don A. Banks, Sam C. Barton, Philip S. Ikin, Karen Lentini, Pia Lindenmayer, David B. Smith, Annabel L. Berry, Laurence E. Burns, Emma L. Edworthy, Amanda Evans, Maldwyn J. Gibson, Rebecca Heinsohn, Rob Howland, Brett Kay, Geoff Munro, Nicola Scheele, Ben C. Stirnemann, Ingrid Stojanovic, Dejan Sweaney, Nici Villaseñor, Nélida R. Westgate, Martin J. |
author_facet | Driscoll, Don A. Banks, Sam C. Barton, Philip S. Ikin, Karen Lentini, Pia Lindenmayer, David B. Smith, Annabel L. Berry, Laurence E. Burns, Emma L. Edworthy, Amanda Evans, Maldwyn J. Gibson, Rebecca Heinsohn, Rob Howland, Brett Kay, Geoff Munro, Nicola Scheele, Ben C. Stirnemann, Ingrid Stojanovic, Dejan Sweaney, Nici Villaseñor, Nélida R. Westgate, Martin J. |
author_sort | Driscoll, Don A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dispersal knowledge is essential for conservation management, and demand is growing. But are we accumulating dispersal knowledge at a pace that can meet the demand? To answer this question we tested for changes in dispersal data collection and use over time. Our systematic review of 655 conservation-related publications compared five topics: climate change, habitat restoration, population viability analysis, land planning (systematic conservation planning) and invasive species. We analysed temporal changes in the: (i) questions asked by dispersal-related research; (ii) methods used to study dispersal; (iii) the quality of dispersal data; (iv) extent that dispersal knowledge is lacking, and; (v) likely consequences of limited dispersal knowledge. Research questions have changed little over time; the same problems examined in the 1990s are still being addressed. The most common methods used to study dispersal were occupancy data, expert opinion and modelling, which often provided indirect, low quality information about dispersal. Although use of genetics for estimating dispersal has increased, new ecological and genetic methods for measuring dispersal are not yet widely adopted. Almost half of the papers identified knowledge gaps related to dispersal. Limited dispersal knowledge often made it impossible to discover ecological processes or compromised conservation outcomes. The quality of dispersal data used in climate change research has increased since the 1990s. In comparison, restoration ecology inadequately addresses large-scale process, whilst the gap between knowledge accumulation and growth in applications may be increasing in land planning. To overcome apparent stagnation in collection and use of dispersal knowledge, researchers need to: (i) improve the quality of available data using new approaches; (ii) understand the complementarities of different methods and; (iii) define the value of different kinds of dispersal information for supporting management decisions. Ambitious, multi-disciplinary research programs studying many species are critical for advancing dispersal research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3990620 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39906202014-04-21 The Trajectory of Dispersal Research in Conservation Biology. Systematic Review Driscoll, Don A. Banks, Sam C. Barton, Philip S. Ikin, Karen Lentini, Pia Lindenmayer, David B. Smith, Annabel L. Berry, Laurence E. Burns, Emma L. Edworthy, Amanda Evans, Maldwyn J. Gibson, Rebecca Heinsohn, Rob Howland, Brett Kay, Geoff Munro, Nicola Scheele, Ben C. Stirnemann, Ingrid Stojanovic, Dejan Sweaney, Nici Villaseñor, Nélida R. Westgate, Martin J. PLoS One Research Article Dispersal knowledge is essential for conservation management, and demand is growing. But are we accumulating dispersal knowledge at a pace that can meet the demand? To answer this question we tested for changes in dispersal data collection and use over time. Our systematic review of 655 conservation-related publications compared five topics: climate change, habitat restoration, population viability analysis, land planning (systematic conservation planning) and invasive species. We analysed temporal changes in the: (i) questions asked by dispersal-related research; (ii) methods used to study dispersal; (iii) the quality of dispersal data; (iv) extent that dispersal knowledge is lacking, and; (v) likely consequences of limited dispersal knowledge. Research questions have changed little over time; the same problems examined in the 1990s are still being addressed. The most common methods used to study dispersal were occupancy data, expert opinion and modelling, which often provided indirect, low quality information about dispersal. Although use of genetics for estimating dispersal has increased, new ecological and genetic methods for measuring dispersal are not yet widely adopted. Almost half of the papers identified knowledge gaps related to dispersal. Limited dispersal knowledge often made it impossible to discover ecological processes or compromised conservation outcomes. The quality of dispersal data used in climate change research has increased since the 1990s. In comparison, restoration ecology inadequately addresses large-scale process, whilst the gap between knowledge accumulation and growth in applications may be increasing in land planning. To overcome apparent stagnation in collection and use of dispersal knowledge, researchers need to: (i) improve the quality of available data using new approaches; (ii) understand the complementarities of different methods and; (iii) define the value of different kinds of dispersal information for supporting management decisions. Ambitious, multi-disciplinary research programs studying many species are critical for advancing dispersal research. Public Library of Science 2014-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3990620/ /pubmed/24743447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095053 Text en © 2014 Driscoll et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Driscoll, Don A. Banks, Sam C. Barton, Philip S. Ikin, Karen Lentini, Pia Lindenmayer, David B. Smith, Annabel L. Berry, Laurence E. Burns, Emma L. Edworthy, Amanda Evans, Maldwyn J. Gibson, Rebecca Heinsohn, Rob Howland, Brett Kay, Geoff Munro, Nicola Scheele, Ben C. Stirnemann, Ingrid Stojanovic, Dejan Sweaney, Nici Villaseñor, Nélida R. Westgate, Martin J. The Trajectory of Dispersal Research in Conservation Biology. Systematic Review |
title | The Trajectory of Dispersal Research in Conservation Biology. Systematic Review |
title_full | The Trajectory of Dispersal Research in Conservation Biology. Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | The Trajectory of Dispersal Research in Conservation Biology. Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | The Trajectory of Dispersal Research in Conservation Biology. Systematic Review |
title_short | The Trajectory of Dispersal Research in Conservation Biology. Systematic Review |
title_sort | trajectory of dispersal research in conservation biology. systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3990620/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24743447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095053 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT driscolldona thetrajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT bankssamc thetrajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT bartonphilips thetrajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT ikinkaren thetrajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT lentinipia thetrajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT lindenmayerdavidb thetrajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT smithannabell thetrajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT berrylaurencee thetrajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT burnsemmal thetrajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT edworthyamanda thetrajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT evansmaldwynj thetrajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT gibsonrebecca thetrajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT heinsohnrob thetrajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT howlandbrett thetrajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT kaygeoff thetrajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT munronicola thetrajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT scheelebenc thetrajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT stirnemanningrid thetrajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT stojanovicdejan thetrajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT sweaneynici thetrajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT villasenornelidar thetrajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT westgatemartinj thetrajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT driscolldona trajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT bankssamc trajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT bartonphilips trajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT ikinkaren trajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT lentinipia trajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT lindenmayerdavidb trajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT smithannabell trajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT berrylaurencee trajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT burnsemmal trajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT edworthyamanda trajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT evansmaldwynj trajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT gibsonrebecca trajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT heinsohnrob trajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT howlandbrett trajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT kaygeoff trajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT munronicola trajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT scheelebenc trajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT stirnemanningrid trajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT stojanovicdejan trajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT sweaneynici trajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT villasenornelidar trajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview AT westgatemartinj trajectoryofdispersalresearchinconservationbiologysystematicreview |