Cargando…

Risk factors for wound infection after lower segment cesarean section

The incidence of post caesarean wound infection and independent risk factors associated with wound infection were retrospectively studied at a tertiary care hospital. A retrospective case controlled study of 107 patients with wound infection after lower segment caesarean section (LSCS) was undertake...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Al Jama, Fathia E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bloomsbury Qatar Foundation Journals 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3991032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25003037
http://dx.doi.org/10.5339/qmj.2012.2.9
_version_ 1782312367960358912
author Al Jama, Fathia E.
author_facet Al Jama, Fathia E.
author_sort Al Jama, Fathia E.
collection PubMed
description The incidence of post caesarean wound infection and independent risk factors associated with wound infection were retrospectively studied at a tertiary care hospital. A retrospective case controlled study of 107 patients with wound infection after lower segment caesarean section (LSCS) was undertaken between January 1998 and December 2007. The control group comprised of 340 patients selected randomly from among those who had LSCS during the study period with no wound infection. Chart reviews of patients with wound infection were identified using the definitions from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance Systems. Comparisons for categorical variables were performed using the X (2) or Fisher exact test. Continuous variables were compared using the 2-tailed Student t test. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Logistic regression determined the independent risk factors. The overall wound infection rate in the study was 4.2% among 2 541 lower transverse CS. The independent risk factors identified for wound infection were, obesity, duration of labor >12 hours, and no antenatal care. Patients' age and parity, diabetes mellitus, premature rupture of membranes (PROM) >8 hours and elective vs. emergency surgery was not found to be significantly associated with wound infection. Conclusion: The independent risk factors could be incorporated into the policies for surveillance and prevention of wound infection. Antibiotic prophylaxis may be utilized in high risk patients such as PROM, obese patients and prolonged labor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3991032
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Bloomsbury Qatar Foundation Journals
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39910322014-07-07 Risk factors for wound infection after lower segment cesarean section Al Jama, Fathia E. Qatar Med J Original Study The incidence of post caesarean wound infection and independent risk factors associated with wound infection were retrospectively studied at a tertiary care hospital. A retrospective case controlled study of 107 patients with wound infection after lower segment caesarean section (LSCS) was undertaken between January 1998 and December 2007. The control group comprised of 340 patients selected randomly from among those who had LSCS during the study period with no wound infection. Chart reviews of patients with wound infection were identified using the definitions from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance Systems. Comparisons for categorical variables were performed using the X (2) or Fisher exact test. Continuous variables were compared using the 2-tailed Student t test. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Logistic regression determined the independent risk factors. The overall wound infection rate in the study was 4.2% among 2 541 lower transverse CS. The independent risk factors identified for wound infection were, obesity, duration of labor >12 hours, and no antenatal care. Patients' age and parity, diabetes mellitus, premature rupture of membranes (PROM) >8 hours and elective vs. emergency surgery was not found to be significantly associated with wound infection. Conclusion: The independent risk factors could be incorporated into the policies for surveillance and prevention of wound infection. Antibiotic prophylaxis may be utilized in high risk patients such as PROM, obese patients and prolonged labor. Bloomsbury Qatar Foundation Journals 2013-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3991032/ /pubmed/25003037 http://dx.doi.org/10.5339/qmj.2012.2.9 Text en © 2012 Al Jama, licensee Bloomsbury Qatar Foundation Journals. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license CC BY 3.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Study
Al Jama, Fathia E.
Risk factors for wound infection after lower segment cesarean section
title Risk factors for wound infection after lower segment cesarean section
title_full Risk factors for wound infection after lower segment cesarean section
title_fullStr Risk factors for wound infection after lower segment cesarean section
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors for wound infection after lower segment cesarean section
title_short Risk factors for wound infection after lower segment cesarean section
title_sort risk factors for wound infection after lower segment cesarean section
topic Original Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3991032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25003037
http://dx.doi.org/10.5339/qmj.2012.2.9
work_keys_str_mv AT aljamafathiae riskfactorsforwoundinfectionafterlowersegmentcesareansection