Cargando…

Prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities and timing of karyotype analysis in patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) following assisted reproduction

Aims: To analyze the prevalence and type of karyotype abnormalities in RIF patients and to evaluate the adequate timing for analysis and the presence of possible risk factors. Methods: 615 patients (317 women and 298 men) with RIF, having undergone at least 3 sequential failed IVF/ICSI cycles prior...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Sutter, P., Stadhouders, R., Dutré, M., Gerris, J., Dhont, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Universa Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3991441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24753890
_version_ 1782312438209708032
author De Sutter, P.
Stadhouders, R.
Dutré, M.
Gerris, J.
Dhont, M.
author_facet De Sutter, P.
Stadhouders, R.
Dutré, M.
Gerris, J.
Dhont, M.
author_sort De Sutter, P.
collection PubMed
description Aims: To analyze the prevalence and type of karyotype abnormalities in RIF patients and to evaluate the adequate timing for analysis and the presence of possible risk factors. Methods: 615 patients (317 women and 298 men) with RIF, having undergone at least 3 sequential failed IVF/ICSI cycles prior to karyotype analysis, were included in this study. Anomaly rates found were compared with published series. Results: Chromosomal abnormalities were diagnosed in 2.1% of patients (13/615): 8 females (2.5%) and 5 males (1.7%) which is significantly higher for the females than in unselected newborns (0.8%) and normo-ovulatory women (0.6%) but lower than in women with high-order implantation failure (10.8%). No significant differences were found with couples at the start of IVF/ICSI (2.0%). Karyotyping all patients prior to IVF/ICSI results in a higher cost than selecting RIF patients. Two subgroups showed an increased prevalence of abnormalities: secondary infertile women with a history of only miscarriages (9.1%) and women with female infertility (6.0%). Conclusion: A karyotype analysis is indicated in all women with RIF. Nulliparous women with a history of miscarriage and women with documented infertility are at greater risk of CA and are to be advised to undergo karyotyping.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3991441
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Universa Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39914412014-04-21 Prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities and timing of karyotype analysis in patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) following assisted reproduction De Sutter, P. Stadhouders, R. Dutré, M. Gerris, J. Dhont, M. Facts Views Vis Obgyn Original Paper Aims: To analyze the prevalence and type of karyotype abnormalities in RIF patients and to evaluate the adequate timing for analysis and the presence of possible risk factors. Methods: 615 patients (317 women and 298 men) with RIF, having undergone at least 3 sequential failed IVF/ICSI cycles prior to karyotype analysis, were included in this study. Anomaly rates found were compared with published series. Results: Chromosomal abnormalities were diagnosed in 2.1% of patients (13/615): 8 females (2.5%) and 5 males (1.7%) which is significantly higher for the females than in unselected newborns (0.8%) and normo-ovulatory women (0.6%) but lower than in women with high-order implantation failure (10.8%). No significant differences were found with couples at the start of IVF/ICSI (2.0%). Karyotyping all patients prior to IVF/ICSI results in a higher cost than selecting RIF patients. Two subgroups showed an increased prevalence of abnormalities: secondary infertile women with a history of only miscarriages (9.1%) and women with female infertility (6.0%). Conclusion: A karyotype analysis is indicated in all women with RIF. Nulliparous women with a history of miscarriage and women with documented infertility are at greater risk of CA and are to be advised to undergo karyotyping. Universa Press 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3991441/ /pubmed/24753890 Text en Copyright: © 2012 Facts, Views & Vision http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
De Sutter, P.
Stadhouders, R.
Dutré, M.
Gerris, J.
Dhont, M.
Prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities and timing of karyotype analysis in patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) following assisted reproduction
title Prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities and timing of karyotype analysis in patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) following assisted reproduction
title_full Prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities and timing of karyotype analysis in patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) following assisted reproduction
title_fullStr Prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities and timing of karyotype analysis in patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) following assisted reproduction
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities and timing of karyotype analysis in patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) following assisted reproduction
title_short Prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities and timing of karyotype analysis in patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) following assisted reproduction
title_sort prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities and timing of karyotype analysis in patients with recurrent implantation failure (rif) following assisted reproduction
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3991441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24753890
work_keys_str_mv AT desutterp prevalenceofchromosomalabnormalitiesandtimingofkaryotypeanalysisinpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureriffollowingassistedreproduction
AT stadhoudersr prevalenceofchromosomalabnormalitiesandtimingofkaryotypeanalysisinpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureriffollowingassistedreproduction
AT dutrem prevalenceofchromosomalabnormalitiesandtimingofkaryotypeanalysisinpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureriffollowingassistedreproduction
AT gerrisj prevalenceofchromosomalabnormalitiesandtimingofkaryotypeanalysisinpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureriffollowingassistedreproduction
AT dhontm prevalenceofchromosomalabnormalitiesandtimingofkaryotypeanalysisinpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureriffollowingassistedreproduction