Cargando…
Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUD AND OBJECTIVE: Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (NSRH) may be associated with lower postoperative morbidity than radical hysterectomy (RH). We aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of abdominal or laparoscopic NSRH and RH for treating cervical cancer through systematic review...
Autores principales: | Long, Ying, Yao, De-sheng, Pan, Xin-wei, Ou, Ting-yu |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3991621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24748015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094116 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Classical radical hysterectomy and nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer
por: Makowski, Marcin, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Correction: Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Publicado: (2014) -
Urinary retention between nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy and radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A meta-analysis
por: Zhou, Jing, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Efficacy of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy vs. conventional radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Lee, Seung Hyun, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Efficacy and oncologic safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial
por: Roh, Ju-Won, et al.
Publicado: (2015)