Cargando…

Prediagnostic Serum Biomarkers as Early Detection Tools for Pancreatic Cancer in a Large Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: The clinical management of pancreatic cancer is severely hampered by the absence of effective screening tools. METHODS: Sixty-seven biomarkers were evaluated in prediagnostic sera obtained from cases of pancreatic cancer enrolled in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Scre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nolen, Brian M., Brand, Randall E., Prosser, Denise, Velikokhatnaya, Liudmila, Allen, Peter J., Zeh, Herbert J., Grizzle, William E., Lomakin, Aleksey, Lokshin, Anna E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3991628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24747429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094928
_version_ 1782312471939252224
author Nolen, Brian M.
Brand, Randall E.
Prosser, Denise
Velikokhatnaya, Liudmila
Allen, Peter J.
Zeh, Herbert J.
Grizzle, William E.
Lomakin, Aleksey
Lokshin, Anna E.
author_facet Nolen, Brian M.
Brand, Randall E.
Prosser, Denise
Velikokhatnaya, Liudmila
Allen, Peter J.
Zeh, Herbert J.
Grizzle, William E.
Lomakin, Aleksey
Lokshin, Anna E.
author_sort Nolen, Brian M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The clinical management of pancreatic cancer is severely hampered by the absence of effective screening tools. METHODS: Sixty-seven biomarkers were evaluated in prediagnostic sera obtained from cases of pancreatic cancer enrolled in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO). RESULTS: The panel of CA 19-9, OPN, and OPG, identified in a prior retrospective study, was not effective. CA 19-9, CEA, NSE, bHCG, CEACAM1 and PRL were significantly altered in sera obtained from cases greater than 1 year prior to diagnosis. Levels of CA 19-9, CA 125, CEA, PRL, and IL-8 were negatively associated with time to diagnosis. A training/validation study using alternate halves of the PLCO set failed to identify a biomarker panel with significantly improved performance over CA 19-9 alone. When the entire PLCO set was used for training at a specificity (SP) of 95%, a panel of CA 19-9, CEA, and Cyfra 21-1 provided significantly elevated sensitivity (SN) levels of 32.4% and 29.7% in samples collected <1 and >1 year prior to diagnosis, respectively, compared to SN levels of 25.7% and 17.2% for CA 19-9 alone. CONCLUSIONS: Most biomarkers identified in previously conducted case/control studies are ineffective in prediagnostic samples, however several biomarkers were identified as significantly altered up to 35 months prior to diagnosis. Two newly derived biomarker combinations offered advantage over CA 19-9 alone in terms of SN, particularly in samples collected >1 year prior to diagnosis. However, the efficacy of biomarker-based tools remains limited at present. Several biomarkers demonstrated significant velocity related to time to diagnosis, an observation which may offer considerable potential for enhancements in early detection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3991628
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39916282014-04-21 Prediagnostic Serum Biomarkers as Early Detection Tools for Pancreatic Cancer in a Large Prospective Cohort Study Nolen, Brian M. Brand, Randall E. Prosser, Denise Velikokhatnaya, Liudmila Allen, Peter J. Zeh, Herbert J. Grizzle, William E. Lomakin, Aleksey Lokshin, Anna E. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The clinical management of pancreatic cancer is severely hampered by the absence of effective screening tools. METHODS: Sixty-seven biomarkers were evaluated in prediagnostic sera obtained from cases of pancreatic cancer enrolled in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO). RESULTS: The panel of CA 19-9, OPN, and OPG, identified in a prior retrospective study, was not effective. CA 19-9, CEA, NSE, bHCG, CEACAM1 and PRL were significantly altered in sera obtained from cases greater than 1 year prior to diagnosis. Levels of CA 19-9, CA 125, CEA, PRL, and IL-8 were negatively associated with time to diagnosis. A training/validation study using alternate halves of the PLCO set failed to identify a biomarker panel with significantly improved performance over CA 19-9 alone. When the entire PLCO set was used for training at a specificity (SP) of 95%, a panel of CA 19-9, CEA, and Cyfra 21-1 provided significantly elevated sensitivity (SN) levels of 32.4% and 29.7% in samples collected <1 and >1 year prior to diagnosis, respectively, compared to SN levels of 25.7% and 17.2% for CA 19-9 alone. CONCLUSIONS: Most biomarkers identified in previously conducted case/control studies are ineffective in prediagnostic samples, however several biomarkers were identified as significantly altered up to 35 months prior to diagnosis. Two newly derived biomarker combinations offered advantage over CA 19-9 alone in terms of SN, particularly in samples collected >1 year prior to diagnosis. However, the efficacy of biomarker-based tools remains limited at present. Several biomarkers demonstrated significant velocity related to time to diagnosis, an observation which may offer considerable potential for enhancements in early detection. Public Library of Science 2014-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3991628/ /pubmed/24747429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094928 Text en © 2014 Nolen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nolen, Brian M.
Brand, Randall E.
Prosser, Denise
Velikokhatnaya, Liudmila
Allen, Peter J.
Zeh, Herbert J.
Grizzle, William E.
Lomakin, Aleksey
Lokshin, Anna E.
Prediagnostic Serum Biomarkers as Early Detection Tools for Pancreatic Cancer in a Large Prospective Cohort Study
title Prediagnostic Serum Biomarkers as Early Detection Tools for Pancreatic Cancer in a Large Prospective Cohort Study
title_full Prediagnostic Serum Biomarkers as Early Detection Tools for Pancreatic Cancer in a Large Prospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr Prediagnostic Serum Biomarkers as Early Detection Tools for Pancreatic Cancer in a Large Prospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Prediagnostic Serum Biomarkers as Early Detection Tools for Pancreatic Cancer in a Large Prospective Cohort Study
title_short Prediagnostic Serum Biomarkers as Early Detection Tools for Pancreatic Cancer in a Large Prospective Cohort Study
title_sort prediagnostic serum biomarkers as early detection tools for pancreatic cancer in a large prospective cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3991628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24747429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094928
work_keys_str_mv AT nolenbrianm prediagnosticserumbiomarkersasearlydetectiontoolsforpancreaticcancerinalargeprospectivecohortstudy
AT brandrandalle prediagnosticserumbiomarkersasearlydetectiontoolsforpancreaticcancerinalargeprospectivecohortstudy
AT prosserdenise prediagnosticserumbiomarkersasearlydetectiontoolsforpancreaticcancerinalargeprospectivecohortstudy
AT velikokhatnayaliudmila prediagnosticserumbiomarkersasearlydetectiontoolsforpancreaticcancerinalargeprospectivecohortstudy
AT allenpeterj prediagnosticserumbiomarkersasearlydetectiontoolsforpancreaticcancerinalargeprospectivecohortstudy
AT zehherbertj prediagnosticserumbiomarkersasearlydetectiontoolsforpancreaticcancerinalargeprospectivecohortstudy
AT grizzlewilliame prediagnosticserumbiomarkersasearlydetectiontoolsforpancreaticcancerinalargeprospectivecohortstudy
AT lomakinaleksey prediagnosticserumbiomarkersasearlydetectiontoolsforpancreaticcancerinalargeprospectivecohortstudy
AT lokshinannae prediagnosticserumbiomarkersasearlydetectiontoolsforpancreaticcancerinalargeprospectivecohortstudy