Cargando…

Which older people decline participation in a primary care trial of physical activity and why: insights from a mixed methods approach

BACKGROUND: Physical activity is of vital importance to older peoples’ health. Physical activity intervention studies with older people often have low recruitment, yet little is known about non-participants. METHODS: Patients aged 60–74 years from three UK general practices were invited to participa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rogers, Annabelle, Harris, Tess, Victor, Christina, Woodcock, Alison, Limb, Elizabeth, Kerry, Sally, Iliffe, Steve, Whincup, Peter, Ekelund, Ulf, Beighton, Carole, Ussher, Michael, Adams, Fredrika, Cook, Derek G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3991893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24725730
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-14-46
_version_ 1782312518047236096
author Rogers, Annabelle
Harris, Tess
Victor, Christina
Woodcock, Alison
Limb, Elizabeth
Kerry, Sally
Iliffe, Steve
Whincup, Peter
Ekelund, Ulf
Beighton, Carole
Ussher, Michael
Adams, Fredrika
Cook, Derek G
author_facet Rogers, Annabelle
Harris, Tess
Victor, Christina
Woodcock, Alison
Limb, Elizabeth
Kerry, Sally
Iliffe, Steve
Whincup, Peter
Ekelund, Ulf
Beighton, Carole
Ussher, Michael
Adams, Fredrika
Cook, Derek G
author_sort Rogers, Annabelle
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Physical activity is of vital importance to older peoples’ health. Physical activity intervention studies with older people often have low recruitment, yet little is known about non-participants. METHODS: Patients aged 60–74 years from three UK general practices were invited to participate in a nurse-supported pedometer-based walking intervention. Demographic characteristics of 298 participants and 690 non-participants were compared. Health status and physical activity of 298 participants and 183 non-participants who completed a survey were compared using age, sex adjusted odds ratios (OR) (95% confidence intervals). 15 non-participants were interviewed to explore perceived barriers to participation. RESULTS: Recruitment was 30% (298/988). Participants were more likely than non-participants to be female (54% v 47%; p = 0.04) and to live in affluent postcodes (73% v 62% in top quintile; p < 0.001). Participants were more likely than non-participants who completed the survey to have an occupational pension OR 2.06 (1.35-3.13), a limiting longstanding illness OR 1.72 (1.05-2.79) and less likely to report being active OR 0.55 (0.33-0.93) or walking fast OR 0.56 (0.37-0.84). Interviewees supported general practice-based physical activity studies, particularly walking, but barriers to participation included: already sufficiently active, reluctance to walk alone or at night, physical symptoms, depression, time constraints, trial equipment and duration. CONCLUSION: Gender and deprivation differences suggest some selection bias. However, trial participants reported more health problems and lower activity than non-participants who completed the survey, suggesting appropriate trial selection in a general practice population. Non-participant interviewees indicated that shorter interventions, addressing physical symptoms and promoting confidence in pursuing physical activity, might increase trial recruitment and uptake of practice-based physical activity endeavours.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3991893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39918932014-04-20 Which older people decline participation in a primary care trial of physical activity and why: insights from a mixed methods approach Rogers, Annabelle Harris, Tess Victor, Christina Woodcock, Alison Limb, Elizabeth Kerry, Sally Iliffe, Steve Whincup, Peter Ekelund, Ulf Beighton, Carole Ussher, Michael Adams, Fredrika Cook, Derek G BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Physical activity is of vital importance to older peoples’ health. Physical activity intervention studies with older people often have low recruitment, yet little is known about non-participants. METHODS: Patients aged 60–74 years from three UK general practices were invited to participate in a nurse-supported pedometer-based walking intervention. Demographic characteristics of 298 participants and 690 non-participants were compared. Health status and physical activity of 298 participants and 183 non-participants who completed a survey were compared using age, sex adjusted odds ratios (OR) (95% confidence intervals). 15 non-participants were interviewed to explore perceived barriers to participation. RESULTS: Recruitment was 30% (298/988). Participants were more likely than non-participants to be female (54% v 47%; p = 0.04) and to live in affluent postcodes (73% v 62% in top quintile; p < 0.001). Participants were more likely than non-participants who completed the survey to have an occupational pension OR 2.06 (1.35-3.13), a limiting longstanding illness OR 1.72 (1.05-2.79) and less likely to report being active OR 0.55 (0.33-0.93) or walking fast OR 0.56 (0.37-0.84). Interviewees supported general practice-based physical activity studies, particularly walking, but barriers to participation included: already sufficiently active, reluctance to walk alone or at night, physical symptoms, depression, time constraints, trial equipment and duration. CONCLUSION: Gender and deprivation differences suggest some selection bias. However, trial participants reported more health problems and lower activity than non-participants who completed the survey, suggesting appropriate trial selection in a general practice population. Non-participant interviewees indicated that shorter interventions, addressing physical symptoms and promoting confidence in pursuing physical activity, might increase trial recruitment and uptake of practice-based physical activity endeavours. BioMed Central 2014-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3991893/ /pubmed/24725730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-14-46 Text en Copyright © 2014 Rogers et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rogers, Annabelle
Harris, Tess
Victor, Christina
Woodcock, Alison
Limb, Elizabeth
Kerry, Sally
Iliffe, Steve
Whincup, Peter
Ekelund, Ulf
Beighton, Carole
Ussher, Michael
Adams, Fredrika
Cook, Derek G
Which older people decline participation in a primary care trial of physical activity and why: insights from a mixed methods approach
title Which older people decline participation in a primary care trial of physical activity and why: insights from a mixed methods approach
title_full Which older people decline participation in a primary care trial of physical activity and why: insights from a mixed methods approach
title_fullStr Which older people decline participation in a primary care trial of physical activity and why: insights from a mixed methods approach
title_full_unstemmed Which older people decline participation in a primary care trial of physical activity and why: insights from a mixed methods approach
title_short Which older people decline participation in a primary care trial of physical activity and why: insights from a mixed methods approach
title_sort which older people decline participation in a primary care trial of physical activity and why: insights from a mixed methods approach
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3991893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24725730
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-14-46
work_keys_str_mv AT rogersannabelle whicholderpeopledeclineparticipationinaprimarycaretrialofphysicalactivityandwhyinsightsfromamixedmethodsapproach
AT harristess whicholderpeopledeclineparticipationinaprimarycaretrialofphysicalactivityandwhyinsightsfromamixedmethodsapproach
AT victorchristina whicholderpeopledeclineparticipationinaprimarycaretrialofphysicalactivityandwhyinsightsfromamixedmethodsapproach
AT woodcockalison whicholderpeopledeclineparticipationinaprimarycaretrialofphysicalactivityandwhyinsightsfromamixedmethodsapproach
AT limbelizabeth whicholderpeopledeclineparticipationinaprimarycaretrialofphysicalactivityandwhyinsightsfromamixedmethodsapproach
AT kerrysally whicholderpeopledeclineparticipationinaprimarycaretrialofphysicalactivityandwhyinsightsfromamixedmethodsapproach
AT iliffesteve whicholderpeopledeclineparticipationinaprimarycaretrialofphysicalactivityandwhyinsightsfromamixedmethodsapproach
AT whincuppeter whicholderpeopledeclineparticipationinaprimarycaretrialofphysicalactivityandwhyinsightsfromamixedmethodsapproach
AT ekelundulf whicholderpeopledeclineparticipationinaprimarycaretrialofphysicalactivityandwhyinsightsfromamixedmethodsapproach
AT beightoncarole whicholderpeopledeclineparticipationinaprimarycaretrialofphysicalactivityandwhyinsightsfromamixedmethodsapproach
AT usshermichael whicholderpeopledeclineparticipationinaprimarycaretrialofphysicalactivityandwhyinsightsfromamixedmethodsapproach
AT adamsfredrika whicholderpeopledeclineparticipationinaprimarycaretrialofphysicalactivityandwhyinsightsfromamixedmethodsapproach
AT cookderekg whicholderpeopledeclineparticipationinaprimarycaretrialofphysicalactivityandwhyinsightsfromamixedmethodsapproach