Cargando…
Which older people decline participation in a primary care trial of physical activity and why: insights from a mixed methods approach
BACKGROUND: Physical activity is of vital importance to older peoples’ health. Physical activity intervention studies with older people often have low recruitment, yet little is known about non-participants. METHODS: Patients aged 60–74 years from three UK general practices were invited to participa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3991893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24725730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-14-46 |
_version_ | 1782312518047236096 |
---|---|
author | Rogers, Annabelle Harris, Tess Victor, Christina Woodcock, Alison Limb, Elizabeth Kerry, Sally Iliffe, Steve Whincup, Peter Ekelund, Ulf Beighton, Carole Ussher, Michael Adams, Fredrika Cook, Derek G |
author_facet | Rogers, Annabelle Harris, Tess Victor, Christina Woodcock, Alison Limb, Elizabeth Kerry, Sally Iliffe, Steve Whincup, Peter Ekelund, Ulf Beighton, Carole Ussher, Michael Adams, Fredrika Cook, Derek G |
author_sort | Rogers, Annabelle |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Physical activity is of vital importance to older peoples’ health. Physical activity intervention studies with older people often have low recruitment, yet little is known about non-participants. METHODS: Patients aged 60–74 years from three UK general practices were invited to participate in a nurse-supported pedometer-based walking intervention. Demographic characteristics of 298 participants and 690 non-participants were compared. Health status and physical activity of 298 participants and 183 non-participants who completed a survey were compared using age, sex adjusted odds ratios (OR) (95% confidence intervals). 15 non-participants were interviewed to explore perceived barriers to participation. RESULTS: Recruitment was 30% (298/988). Participants were more likely than non-participants to be female (54% v 47%; p = 0.04) and to live in affluent postcodes (73% v 62% in top quintile; p < 0.001). Participants were more likely than non-participants who completed the survey to have an occupational pension OR 2.06 (1.35-3.13), a limiting longstanding illness OR 1.72 (1.05-2.79) and less likely to report being active OR 0.55 (0.33-0.93) or walking fast OR 0.56 (0.37-0.84). Interviewees supported general practice-based physical activity studies, particularly walking, but barriers to participation included: already sufficiently active, reluctance to walk alone or at night, physical symptoms, depression, time constraints, trial equipment and duration. CONCLUSION: Gender and deprivation differences suggest some selection bias. However, trial participants reported more health problems and lower activity than non-participants who completed the survey, suggesting appropriate trial selection in a general practice population. Non-participant interviewees indicated that shorter interventions, addressing physical symptoms and promoting confidence in pursuing physical activity, might increase trial recruitment and uptake of practice-based physical activity endeavours. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3991893 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39918932014-04-20 Which older people decline participation in a primary care trial of physical activity and why: insights from a mixed methods approach Rogers, Annabelle Harris, Tess Victor, Christina Woodcock, Alison Limb, Elizabeth Kerry, Sally Iliffe, Steve Whincup, Peter Ekelund, Ulf Beighton, Carole Ussher, Michael Adams, Fredrika Cook, Derek G BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Physical activity is of vital importance to older peoples’ health. Physical activity intervention studies with older people often have low recruitment, yet little is known about non-participants. METHODS: Patients aged 60–74 years from three UK general practices were invited to participate in a nurse-supported pedometer-based walking intervention. Demographic characteristics of 298 participants and 690 non-participants were compared. Health status and physical activity of 298 participants and 183 non-participants who completed a survey were compared using age, sex adjusted odds ratios (OR) (95% confidence intervals). 15 non-participants were interviewed to explore perceived barriers to participation. RESULTS: Recruitment was 30% (298/988). Participants were more likely than non-participants to be female (54% v 47%; p = 0.04) and to live in affluent postcodes (73% v 62% in top quintile; p < 0.001). Participants were more likely than non-participants who completed the survey to have an occupational pension OR 2.06 (1.35-3.13), a limiting longstanding illness OR 1.72 (1.05-2.79) and less likely to report being active OR 0.55 (0.33-0.93) or walking fast OR 0.56 (0.37-0.84). Interviewees supported general practice-based physical activity studies, particularly walking, but barriers to participation included: already sufficiently active, reluctance to walk alone or at night, physical symptoms, depression, time constraints, trial equipment and duration. CONCLUSION: Gender and deprivation differences suggest some selection bias. However, trial participants reported more health problems and lower activity than non-participants who completed the survey, suggesting appropriate trial selection in a general practice population. Non-participant interviewees indicated that shorter interventions, addressing physical symptoms and promoting confidence in pursuing physical activity, might increase trial recruitment and uptake of practice-based physical activity endeavours. BioMed Central 2014-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3991893/ /pubmed/24725730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-14-46 Text en Copyright © 2014 Rogers et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Rogers, Annabelle Harris, Tess Victor, Christina Woodcock, Alison Limb, Elizabeth Kerry, Sally Iliffe, Steve Whincup, Peter Ekelund, Ulf Beighton, Carole Ussher, Michael Adams, Fredrika Cook, Derek G Which older people decline participation in a primary care trial of physical activity and why: insights from a mixed methods approach |
title | Which older people decline participation in a primary care trial of physical activity and why: insights from a mixed methods approach |
title_full | Which older people decline participation in a primary care trial of physical activity and why: insights from a mixed methods approach |
title_fullStr | Which older people decline participation in a primary care trial of physical activity and why: insights from a mixed methods approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Which older people decline participation in a primary care trial of physical activity and why: insights from a mixed methods approach |
title_short | Which older people decline participation in a primary care trial of physical activity and why: insights from a mixed methods approach |
title_sort | which older people decline participation in a primary care trial of physical activity and why: insights from a mixed methods approach |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3991893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24725730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-14-46 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rogersannabelle whicholderpeopledeclineparticipationinaprimarycaretrialofphysicalactivityandwhyinsightsfromamixedmethodsapproach AT harristess whicholderpeopledeclineparticipationinaprimarycaretrialofphysicalactivityandwhyinsightsfromamixedmethodsapproach AT victorchristina whicholderpeopledeclineparticipationinaprimarycaretrialofphysicalactivityandwhyinsightsfromamixedmethodsapproach AT woodcockalison whicholderpeopledeclineparticipationinaprimarycaretrialofphysicalactivityandwhyinsightsfromamixedmethodsapproach AT limbelizabeth whicholderpeopledeclineparticipationinaprimarycaretrialofphysicalactivityandwhyinsightsfromamixedmethodsapproach AT kerrysally whicholderpeopledeclineparticipationinaprimarycaretrialofphysicalactivityandwhyinsightsfromamixedmethodsapproach AT iliffesteve whicholderpeopledeclineparticipationinaprimarycaretrialofphysicalactivityandwhyinsightsfromamixedmethodsapproach AT whincuppeter whicholderpeopledeclineparticipationinaprimarycaretrialofphysicalactivityandwhyinsightsfromamixedmethodsapproach AT ekelundulf whicholderpeopledeclineparticipationinaprimarycaretrialofphysicalactivityandwhyinsightsfromamixedmethodsapproach AT beightoncarole whicholderpeopledeclineparticipationinaprimarycaretrialofphysicalactivityandwhyinsightsfromamixedmethodsapproach AT usshermichael whicholderpeopledeclineparticipationinaprimarycaretrialofphysicalactivityandwhyinsightsfromamixedmethodsapproach AT adamsfredrika whicholderpeopledeclineparticipationinaprimarycaretrialofphysicalactivityandwhyinsightsfromamixedmethodsapproach AT cookderekg whicholderpeopledeclineparticipationinaprimarycaretrialofphysicalactivityandwhyinsightsfromamixedmethodsapproach |