Cargando…

Use of a standardized code status explanation by residents among hospitalized patients

OBJECTIVES: There is wide variability in the discussion of code status by residents among hospitalized patients. The primary objective of this study was to determine the effect of a scripted code status explanation on patient understanding of choices pertaining to code status and end-of-life care. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mittal, Kriti, Sharma, Kapil, Dangayach, Neha, Raval, Dhaval, Leung, Katherine, George, Susan, Abraham, George
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Co-Action Publishing 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3992358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24765258
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/jchimp.v4.23745
_version_ 1782312568559239168
author Mittal, Kriti
Sharma, Kapil
Dangayach, Neha
Raval, Dhaval
Leung, Katherine
George, Susan
Abraham, George
author_facet Mittal, Kriti
Sharma, Kapil
Dangayach, Neha
Raval, Dhaval
Leung, Katherine
George, Susan
Abraham, George
author_sort Mittal, Kriti
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: There is wide variability in the discussion of code status by residents among hospitalized patients. The primary objective of this study was to determine the effect of a scripted code status explanation on patient understanding of choices pertaining to code status and end-of-life care. METHODS: This was a single center, randomized trial in a teaching hospital. Patients were randomized to a control (questionnaire alone) or intervention arm (standardized explanation+ questionnaire). A composite score was generated based on patient responses to assess comprehension. RESULTS: The composite score was 5.27 in the intervention compared to 4.93 in the control arm (p=0.066). The score was lower in older patients (p<0.001), patients with multiple comorbidities (p≤0.001), KATZ score <6 (p=0.008), and those living in an assisted living/nursing home (p=0.005). There were significant differences in patient understanding of the ability to receive chest compressions, intravenous fluids, and tube feeds by code status. CONCLUSION: The scripted code status explanation did not significantly impact the composite score. Age, comorbidities, performance status, and type of residence demonstrated a significant association with patient understanding of code status choices. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Standardized discussion of code status and training in communication of end-of-life care merit further research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3992358
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Co-Action Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39923582014-04-24 Use of a standardized code status explanation by residents among hospitalized patients Mittal, Kriti Sharma, Kapil Dangayach, Neha Raval, Dhaval Leung, Katherine George, Susan Abraham, George J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect Research Article OBJECTIVES: There is wide variability in the discussion of code status by residents among hospitalized patients. The primary objective of this study was to determine the effect of a scripted code status explanation on patient understanding of choices pertaining to code status and end-of-life care. METHODS: This was a single center, randomized trial in a teaching hospital. Patients were randomized to a control (questionnaire alone) or intervention arm (standardized explanation+ questionnaire). A composite score was generated based on patient responses to assess comprehension. RESULTS: The composite score was 5.27 in the intervention compared to 4.93 in the control arm (p=0.066). The score was lower in older patients (p<0.001), patients with multiple comorbidities (p≤0.001), KATZ score <6 (p=0.008), and those living in an assisted living/nursing home (p=0.005). There were significant differences in patient understanding of the ability to receive chest compressions, intravenous fluids, and tube feeds by code status. CONCLUSION: The scripted code status explanation did not significantly impact the composite score. Age, comorbidities, performance status, and type of residence demonstrated a significant association with patient understanding of code status choices. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Standardized discussion of code status and training in communication of end-of-life care merit further research. Co-Action Publishing 2014-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3992358/ /pubmed/24765258 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/jchimp.v4.23745 Text en © 2014 Kriti Mittal et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mittal, Kriti
Sharma, Kapil
Dangayach, Neha
Raval, Dhaval
Leung, Katherine
George, Susan
Abraham, George
Use of a standardized code status explanation by residents among hospitalized patients
title Use of a standardized code status explanation by residents among hospitalized patients
title_full Use of a standardized code status explanation by residents among hospitalized patients
title_fullStr Use of a standardized code status explanation by residents among hospitalized patients
title_full_unstemmed Use of a standardized code status explanation by residents among hospitalized patients
title_short Use of a standardized code status explanation by residents among hospitalized patients
title_sort use of a standardized code status explanation by residents among hospitalized patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3992358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24765258
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/jchimp.v4.23745
work_keys_str_mv AT mittalkriti useofastandardizedcodestatusexplanationbyresidentsamonghospitalizedpatients
AT sharmakapil useofastandardizedcodestatusexplanationbyresidentsamonghospitalizedpatients
AT dangayachneha useofastandardizedcodestatusexplanationbyresidentsamonghospitalizedpatients
AT ravaldhaval useofastandardizedcodestatusexplanationbyresidentsamonghospitalizedpatients
AT leungkatherine useofastandardizedcodestatusexplanationbyresidentsamonghospitalizedpatients
AT georgesusan useofastandardizedcodestatusexplanationbyresidentsamonghospitalizedpatients
AT abrahamgeorge useofastandardizedcodestatusexplanationbyresidentsamonghospitalizedpatients