Cargando…
Use of a standardized code status explanation by residents among hospitalized patients
OBJECTIVES: There is wide variability in the discussion of code status by residents among hospitalized patients. The primary objective of this study was to determine the effect of a scripted code status explanation on patient understanding of choices pertaining to code status and end-of-life care. M...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Co-Action Publishing
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3992358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24765258 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/jchimp.v4.23745 |
_version_ | 1782312568559239168 |
---|---|
author | Mittal, Kriti Sharma, Kapil Dangayach, Neha Raval, Dhaval Leung, Katherine George, Susan Abraham, George |
author_facet | Mittal, Kriti Sharma, Kapil Dangayach, Neha Raval, Dhaval Leung, Katherine George, Susan Abraham, George |
author_sort | Mittal, Kriti |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: There is wide variability in the discussion of code status by residents among hospitalized patients. The primary objective of this study was to determine the effect of a scripted code status explanation on patient understanding of choices pertaining to code status and end-of-life care. METHODS: This was a single center, randomized trial in a teaching hospital. Patients were randomized to a control (questionnaire alone) or intervention arm (standardized explanation+ questionnaire). A composite score was generated based on patient responses to assess comprehension. RESULTS: The composite score was 5.27 in the intervention compared to 4.93 in the control arm (p=0.066). The score was lower in older patients (p<0.001), patients with multiple comorbidities (p≤0.001), KATZ score <6 (p=0.008), and those living in an assisted living/nursing home (p=0.005). There were significant differences in patient understanding of the ability to receive chest compressions, intravenous fluids, and tube feeds by code status. CONCLUSION: The scripted code status explanation did not significantly impact the composite score. Age, comorbidities, performance status, and type of residence demonstrated a significant association with patient understanding of code status choices. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Standardized discussion of code status and training in communication of end-of-life care merit further research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3992358 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Co-Action Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39923582014-04-24 Use of a standardized code status explanation by residents among hospitalized patients Mittal, Kriti Sharma, Kapil Dangayach, Neha Raval, Dhaval Leung, Katherine George, Susan Abraham, George J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect Research Article OBJECTIVES: There is wide variability in the discussion of code status by residents among hospitalized patients. The primary objective of this study was to determine the effect of a scripted code status explanation on patient understanding of choices pertaining to code status and end-of-life care. METHODS: This was a single center, randomized trial in a teaching hospital. Patients were randomized to a control (questionnaire alone) or intervention arm (standardized explanation+ questionnaire). A composite score was generated based on patient responses to assess comprehension. RESULTS: The composite score was 5.27 in the intervention compared to 4.93 in the control arm (p=0.066). The score was lower in older patients (p<0.001), patients with multiple comorbidities (p≤0.001), KATZ score <6 (p=0.008), and those living in an assisted living/nursing home (p=0.005). There were significant differences in patient understanding of the ability to receive chest compressions, intravenous fluids, and tube feeds by code status. CONCLUSION: The scripted code status explanation did not significantly impact the composite score. Age, comorbidities, performance status, and type of residence demonstrated a significant association with patient understanding of code status choices. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Standardized discussion of code status and training in communication of end-of-life care merit further research. Co-Action Publishing 2014-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3992358/ /pubmed/24765258 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/jchimp.v4.23745 Text en © 2014 Kriti Mittal et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mittal, Kriti Sharma, Kapil Dangayach, Neha Raval, Dhaval Leung, Katherine George, Susan Abraham, George Use of a standardized code status explanation by residents among hospitalized patients |
title | Use of a standardized code status explanation by residents among hospitalized patients |
title_full | Use of a standardized code status explanation by residents among hospitalized patients |
title_fullStr | Use of a standardized code status explanation by residents among hospitalized patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of a standardized code status explanation by residents among hospitalized patients |
title_short | Use of a standardized code status explanation by residents among hospitalized patients |
title_sort | use of a standardized code status explanation by residents among hospitalized patients |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3992358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24765258 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/jchimp.v4.23745 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mittalkriti useofastandardizedcodestatusexplanationbyresidentsamonghospitalizedpatients AT sharmakapil useofastandardizedcodestatusexplanationbyresidentsamonghospitalizedpatients AT dangayachneha useofastandardizedcodestatusexplanationbyresidentsamonghospitalizedpatients AT ravaldhaval useofastandardizedcodestatusexplanationbyresidentsamonghospitalizedpatients AT leungkatherine useofastandardizedcodestatusexplanationbyresidentsamonghospitalizedpatients AT georgesusan useofastandardizedcodestatusexplanationbyresidentsamonghospitalizedpatients AT abrahamgeorge useofastandardizedcodestatusexplanationbyresidentsamonghospitalizedpatients |