Cargando…
Management of lower ureteric stones: a prospective study
OBJECTIVE: To discuss the current concepts in lower ureteric stone management. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between October 2008 and November 2010, 190 patients of both sexes and of different age groups with lower ureteric stones, underwent in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) (48 cases), u...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Polish Urological Association
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3992439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24757544 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2013.04.art19 |
_version_ | 1782312570660585472 |
---|---|
author | Etafy, Mohamed Morsi, Gamal A.M. Beshir, Mansour S.M. Soliman, Sheri S. Galal, Hussein A. Ortiz–Vanderdys, Cervando |
author_facet | Etafy, Mohamed Morsi, Gamal A.M. Beshir, Mansour S.M. Soliman, Sheri S. Galal, Hussein A. Ortiz–Vanderdys, Cervando |
author_sort | Etafy, Mohamed |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To discuss the current concepts in lower ureteric stone management. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between October 2008 and November 2010, 190 patients of both sexes and of different age groups with lower ureteric stones, underwent in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) (48 cases), ureterorenoscopy (URS) (120 cases) and open stone surgery (OSS) (22 cases). The patients’ clinical and radiological findings, as well as stone characteristics, were reviewed and correlated with the stone–free status. RESULTS: In the ESWL group, the operative time was 43.13 +22.5 min; the average number of sessions/patients was 1.5 sessions; the average number of SW/patients was 4500 SW/patients; the average energy was 16.5 kV; the average stone burden was 7.8/mm; the overall stone–free rate was 75% (36/48); and the average radiation exposure time was 3.5 min. In the URS group, the operative time was 49.21 +16.09 min; the average stone burden was 10.81mm; the overall stone–free rate was 97.5% (117/120); the average hospital stay was 3.99 days; and the average radiation exposure time was 0.75 min. In the OSS group, the operative time was 112.38 +37.1 min; the overall stone–free rate was 100% (22/22); and the average hospital stay was 9.74 days. CONCLUSION: In the management of patients with lower ureteral stones, URS, SWL and OSS were considered acceptable treatment options. This recommendation was based on the stone–free results, morbidity and retreatment rates for each therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3992439 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Polish Urological Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39924392014-04-28 Management of lower ureteric stones: a prospective study Etafy, Mohamed Morsi, Gamal A.M. Beshir, Mansour S.M. Soliman, Sheri S. Galal, Hussein A. Ortiz–Vanderdys, Cervando Cent European J Urol Original Paper OBJECTIVE: To discuss the current concepts in lower ureteric stone management. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between October 2008 and November 2010, 190 patients of both sexes and of different age groups with lower ureteric stones, underwent in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) (48 cases), ureterorenoscopy (URS) (120 cases) and open stone surgery (OSS) (22 cases). The patients’ clinical and radiological findings, as well as stone characteristics, were reviewed and correlated with the stone–free status. RESULTS: In the ESWL group, the operative time was 43.13 +22.5 min; the average number of sessions/patients was 1.5 sessions; the average number of SW/patients was 4500 SW/patients; the average energy was 16.5 kV; the average stone burden was 7.8/mm; the overall stone–free rate was 75% (36/48); and the average radiation exposure time was 3.5 min. In the URS group, the operative time was 49.21 +16.09 min; the average stone burden was 10.81mm; the overall stone–free rate was 97.5% (117/120); the average hospital stay was 3.99 days; and the average radiation exposure time was 0.75 min. In the OSS group, the operative time was 112.38 +37.1 min; the overall stone–free rate was 100% (22/22); and the average hospital stay was 9.74 days. CONCLUSION: In the management of patients with lower ureteral stones, URS, SWL and OSS were considered acceptable treatment options. This recommendation was based on the stone–free results, morbidity and retreatment rates for each therapy. Polish Urological Association 2013-12-19 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3992439/ /pubmed/24757544 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2013.04.art19 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Etafy, Mohamed Morsi, Gamal A.M. Beshir, Mansour S.M. Soliman, Sheri S. Galal, Hussein A. Ortiz–Vanderdys, Cervando Management of lower ureteric stones: a prospective study |
title | Management of lower ureteric stones: a prospective study |
title_full | Management of lower ureteric stones: a prospective study |
title_fullStr | Management of lower ureteric stones: a prospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Management of lower ureteric stones: a prospective study |
title_short | Management of lower ureteric stones: a prospective study |
title_sort | management of lower ureteric stones: a prospective study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3992439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24757544 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2013.04.art19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT etafymohamed managementofloweruretericstonesaprospectivestudy AT morsigamalam managementofloweruretericstonesaprospectivestudy AT beshirmansoursm managementofloweruretericstonesaprospectivestudy AT solimansheris managementofloweruretericstonesaprospectivestudy AT galalhusseina managementofloweruretericstonesaprospectivestudy AT ortizvanderdyscervando managementofloweruretericstonesaprospectivestudy |