Cargando…

Management of lower ureteric stones: a prospective study

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the current concepts in lower ureteric stone management. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between October 2008 and November 2010, 190 patients of both sexes and of different age groups with lower ureteric stones, underwent in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) (48 cases), u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Etafy, Mohamed, Morsi, Gamal A.M., Beshir, Mansour S.M., Soliman, Sheri S., Galal, Hussein A., Ortiz–Vanderdys, Cervando
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Polish Urological Association 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3992439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24757544
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2013.04.art19
_version_ 1782312570660585472
author Etafy, Mohamed
Morsi, Gamal A.M.
Beshir, Mansour S.M.
Soliman, Sheri S.
Galal, Hussein A.
Ortiz–Vanderdys, Cervando
author_facet Etafy, Mohamed
Morsi, Gamal A.M.
Beshir, Mansour S.M.
Soliman, Sheri S.
Galal, Hussein A.
Ortiz–Vanderdys, Cervando
author_sort Etafy, Mohamed
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To discuss the current concepts in lower ureteric stone management. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between October 2008 and November 2010, 190 patients of both sexes and of different age groups with lower ureteric stones, underwent in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) (48 cases), ureterorenoscopy (URS) (120 cases) and open stone surgery (OSS) (22 cases). The patients’ clinical and radiological findings, as well as stone characteristics, were reviewed and correlated with the stone–free status. RESULTS: In the ESWL group, the operative time was 43.13 +22.5 min; the average number of sessions/patients was 1.5 sessions; the average number of SW/patients was 4500 SW/patients; the average energy was 16.5 kV; the average stone burden was 7.8/mm; the overall stone–free rate was 75% (36/48); and the average radiation exposure time was 3.5 min. In the URS group, the operative time was 49.21 +16.09 min; the average stone burden was 10.81mm; the overall stone–free rate was 97.5% (117/120); the average hospital stay was 3.99 days; and the average radiation exposure time was 0.75 min. In the OSS group, the operative time was 112.38 +37.1 min; the overall stone–free rate was 100% (22/22); and the average hospital stay was 9.74 days. CONCLUSION: In the management of patients with lower ureteral stones, URS, SWL and OSS were considered acceptable treatment options. This recommendation was based on the stone–free results, morbidity and retreatment rates for each therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3992439
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Polish Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39924392014-04-28 Management of lower ureteric stones: a prospective study Etafy, Mohamed Morsi, Gamal A.M. Beshir, Mansour S.M. Soliman, Sheri S. Galal, Hussein A. Ortiz–Vanderdys, Cervando Cent European J Urol Original Paper OBJECTIVE: To discuss the current concepts in lower ureteric stone management. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between October 2008 and November 2010, 190 patients of both sexes and of different age groups with lower ureteric stones, underwent in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) (48 cases), ureterorenoscopy (URS) (120 cases) and open stone surgery (OSS) (22 cases). The patients’ clinical and radiological findings, as well as stone characteristics, were reviewed and correlated with the stone–free status. RESULTS: In the ESWL group, the operative time was 43.13 +22.5 min; the average number of sessions/patients was 1.5 sessions; the average number of SW/patients was 4500 SW/patients; the average energy was 16.5 kV; the average stone burden was 7.8/mm; the overall stone–free rate was 75% (36/48); and the average radiation exposure time was 3.5 min. In the URS group, the operative time was 49.21 +16.09 min; the average stone burden was 10.81mm; the overall stone–free rate was 97.5% (117/120); the average hospital stay was 3.99 days; and the average radiation exposure time was 0.75 min. In the OSS group, the operative time was 112.38 +37.1 min; the overall stone–free rate was 100% (22/22); and the average hospital stay was 9.74 days. CONCLUSION: In the management of patients with lower ureteral stones, URS, SWL and OSS were considered acceptable treatment options. This recommendation was based on the stone–free results, morbidity and retreatment rates for each therapy. Polish Urological Association 2013-12-19 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3992439/ /pubmed/24757544 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2013.04.art19 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Etafy, Mohamed
Morsi, Gamal A.M.
Beshir, Mansour S.M.
Soliman, Sheri S.
Galal, Hussein A.
Ortiz–Vanderdys, Cervando
Management of lower ureteric stones: a prospective study
title Management of lower ureteric stones: a prospective study
title_full Management of lower ureteric stones: a prospective study
title_fullStr Management of lower ureteric stones: a prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Management of lower ureteric stones: a prospective study
title_short Management of lower ureteric stones: a prospective study
title_sort management of lower ureteric stones: a prospective study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3992439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24757544
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2013.04.art19
work_keys_str_mv AT etafymohamed managementofloweruretericstonesaprospectivestudy
AT morsigamalam managementofloweruretericstonesaprospectivestudy
AT beshirmansoursm managementofloweruretericstonesaprospectivestudy
AT solimansheris managementofloweruretericstonesaprospectivestudy
AT galalhusseina managementofloweruretericstonesaprospectivestudy
AT ortizvanderdyscervando managementofloweruretericstonesaprospectivestudy