Cargando…
URS versus ESWL: another contribution to the never–ending debate
Autor principal: | Hrbáček, Jan |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Polish Urological Association
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3992461/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24757545 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2013.04.art20 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Is there a place for ESWL in the treatment of complicated proximal ureteral stones?
por: Bres–Niewada, Ewa
Publicado: (2013) -
Large impacted distal ureteric stones are treated better by URS: putting priorities
por: Malkhasyan, Vigen, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy in the treatment of untreated renal calculi
por: Fankhauser, Christian D, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Do we really always need gimmicks?
por: Wroński, Stanisław
Publicado: (2013) -
Virtual guidance of urologic surgery
por: Dobruch, Jakub
Publicado: (2013)