Cargando…

Comparison between Intravenous Sodium Valproate and Subcutaneous Sumatriptan for Treatment of Acute Migraine Attacks; Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: Sodium valproate (SV) has been approved for migraine prophylaxis and its intravenous form is used to treat acute migraine attacks. We compared the efficacy and safety of intravenous SV and subcutaneous Sumatriptan in managing acute migraine attacks. Methods: This double-blind randomized...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rahimdel, Abolghasem, Mellat, Ali, Zeinali, Ahmad, Jafari, Elahe, Ayatollahi, Parisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3993044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24753639
_version_ 1782312616431976448
author Rahimdel, Abolghasem
Mellat, Ali
Zeinali, Ahmad
Jafari, Elahe
Ayatollahi, Parisa
author_facet Rahimdel, Abolghasem
Mellat, Ali
Zeinali, Ahmad
Jafari, Elahe
Ayatollahi, Parisa
author_sort Rahimdel, Abolghasem
collection PubMed
description Background: Sodium valproate (SV) has been approved for migraine prophylaxis and its intravenous form is used to treat acute migraine attacks. We compared the efficacy and safety of intravenous SV and subcutaneous Sumatriptan in managing acute migraine attacks. Methods: This double-blind randomized clinical trial divided 90 patients into two groups: one group received 400 mg of intravenous SV and the second group received 6 mg of subcutaneous Sumatriptan. Headache severity before treatment and half an hour, one hour, and two hours after treatment was measured based on the VNRS in the groups. Associated symptoms, i.e., photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, and vomiting, were assayed on admission and 2 hours after treatment. Side effects of the drugs were checked 2 hours after injection. Obtained data from the groups were compared. Results: In both groups, pain decrement at the mentioned time points was significant (P<0.001), but had no significant difference (P>0.05), indicating the similar effect of both drugs on pain improvement. In the SV group, photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, and vomiting were improved significantly, while in the Sumatriptan group, only photophobia and vomiting were decreased significantly, indicating the advantage of SV in improving the associated symptoms. Nausea, vomiting, facial paresthesia, and hypotension were more significantly frequent in the Sumatriptan group than in the SV group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Intravenous SV (400 mg) was as effective as subcutaneous Sumatriptan in the treatment of acute migraine attacks, but with more improvement in associated symptoms and with fewer side effects. Trial Registration Number: IRCT201108025943N4
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3993044
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39930442014-04-21 Comparison between Intravenous Sodium Valproate and Subcutaneous Sumatriptan for Treatment of Acute Migraine Attacks; Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial Rahimdel, Abolghasem Mellat, Ali Zeinali, Ahmad Jafari, Elahe Ayatollahi, Parisa Iran J Med Sci Original Article Background: Sodium valproate (SV) has been approved for migraine prophylaxis and its intravenous form is used to treat acute migraine attacks. We compared the efficacy and safety of intravenous SV and subcutaneous Sumatriptan in managing acute migraine attacks. Methods: This double-blind randomized clinical trial divided 90 patients into two groups: one group received 400 mg of intravenous SV and the second group received 6 mg of subcutaneous Sumatriptan. Headache severity before treatment and half an hour, one hour, and two hours after treatment was measured based on the VNRS in the groups. Associated symptoms, i.e., photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, and vomiting, were assayed on admission and 2 hours after treatment. Side effects of the drugs were checked 2 hours after injection. Obtained data from the groups were compared. Results: In both groups, pain decrement at the mentioned time points was significant (P<0.001), but had no significant difference (P>0.05), indicating the similar effect of both drugs on pain improvement. In the SV group, photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, and vomiting were improved significantly, while in the Sumatriptan group, only photophobia and vomiting were decreased significantly, indicating the advantage of SV in improving the associated symptoms. Nausea, vomiting, facial paresthesia, and hypotension were more significantly frequent in the Sumatriptan group than in the SV group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Intravenous SV (400 mg) was as effective as subcutaneous Sumatriptan in the treatment of acute migraine attacks, but with more improvement in associated symptoms and with fewer side effects. Trial Registration Number: IRCT201108025943N4 Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2014-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3993044/ /pubmed/24753639 Text en © 2014: Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rahimdel, Abolghasem
Mellat, Ali
Zeinali, Ahmad
Jafari, Elahe
Ayatollahi, Parisa
Comparison between Intravenous Sodium Valproate and Subcutaneous Sumatriptan for Treatment of Acute Migraine Attacks; Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
title Comparison between Intravenous Sodium Valproate and Subcutaneous Sumatriptan for Treatment of Acute Migraine Attacks; Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Comparison between Intravenous Sodium Valproate and Subcutaneous Sumatriptan for Treatment of Acute Migraine Attacks; Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Comparison between Intravenous Sodium Valproate and Subcutaneous Sumatriptan for Treatment of Acute Migraine Attacks; Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Intravenous Sodium Valproate and Subcutaneous Sumatriptan for Treatment of Acute Migraine Attacks; Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Comparison between Intravenous Sodium Valproate and Subcutaneous Sumatriptan for Treatment of Acute Migraine Attacks; Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort comparison between intravenous sodium valproate and subcutaneous sumatriptan for treatment of acute migraine attacks; double-blind randomized clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3993044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24753639
work_keys_str_mv AT rahimdelabolghasem comparisonbetweenintravenoussodiumvalproateandsubcutaneoussumatriptanfortreatmentofacutemigraineattacksdoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT mellatali comparisonbetweenintravenoussodiumvalproateandsubcutaneoussumatriptanfortreatmentofacutemigraineattacksdoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT zeinaliahmad comparisonbetweenintravenoussodiumvalproateandsubcutaneoussumatriptanfortreatmentofacutemigraineattacksdoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT jafarielahe comparisonbetweenintravenoussodiumvalproateandsubcutaneoussumatriptanfortreatmentofacutemigraineattacksdoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT ayatollahiparisa comparisonbetweenintravenoussodiumvalproateandsubcutaneoussumatriptanfortreatmentofacutemigraineattacksdoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial