Cargando…

Iron Nitrosyl “Natural” Porphyrinates: Does the Porphyrin Matter?

[Image: see text] The synthesis and spectroscopic characterization of three five-coordinate nitrosyliron(II) complexes, [Fe(Porph)(NO)], are reported. These three nitrosyl derivatives, where Porph represents protoporphyrin IX dimethyl ester, mesoporphyrin IX dimethyl ester, or deuteroporphyrin IX di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wyllie, Graeme R. A., Silvernail, Nathan J., Oliver, Allen G., Schulz, Charles E., Scheidt, W. Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2014
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3993899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24620710
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ic500086k
_version_ 1782312633263718400
author Wyllie, Graeme R. A.
Silvernail, Nathan J.
Oliver, Allen G.
Schulz, Charles E.
Scheidt, W. Robert
author_facet Wyllie, Graeme R. A.
Silvernail, Nathan J.
Oliver, Allen G.
Schulz, Charles E.
Scheidt, W. Robert
author_sort Wyllie, Graeme R. A.
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] The synthesis and spectroscopic characterization of three five-coordinate nitrosyliron(II) complexes, [Fe(Porph)(NO)], are reported. These three nitrosyl derivatives, where Porph represents protoporphyrin IX dimethyl ester, mesoporphyrin IX dimethyl ester, or deuteroporphyrin IX dimethyl ester, display notable differences in their properties relative to the symmetrical synthetic porphyrins such as OEP and TPP. The N–O stretching frequencies are in the range of 1651–1660 cm(–1), frequencies that are lower than those of synthetic porphyrin derivatives. Mössbauer spectra obtained in both zero and applied magnetic field show that the quadrupole splitting values are slightly larger than those of known synthetic porphyrins. The electronic structures of these naturally occurring porphyrin derivatives are thus seen to be consistently different from those of the synthetic derivatives, the presumed consequence of the asymmetric peripheral substituent pattern. The molecular structure of [Fe(PPIX-DME)(NO)] has been determined by X-ray crystallography. Although disorder of the axial nitrosyl ligand limits the structural quality, this derivative appears to show the same subtle structural features as previously characterized five-coordinate nitrosyls.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3993899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39938992015-03-12 Iron Nitrosyl “Natural” Porphyrinates: Does the Porphyrin Matter? Wyllie, Graeme R. A. Silvernail, Nathan J. Oliver, Allen G. Schulz, Charles E. Scheidt, W. Robert Inorg Chem [Image: see text] The synthesis and spectroscopic characterization of three five-coordinate nitrosyliron(II) complexes, [Fe(Porph)(NO)], are reported. These three nitrosyl derivatives, where Porph represents protoporphyrin IX dimethyl ester, mesoporphyrin IX dimethyl ester, or deuteroporphyrin IX dimethyl ester, display notable differences in their properties relative to the symmetrical synthetic porphyrins such as OEP and TPP. The N–O stretching frequencies are in the range of 1651–1660 cm(–1), frequencies that are lower than those of synthetic porphyrin derivatives. Mössbauer spectra obtained in both zero and applied magnetic field show that the quadrupole splitting values are slightly larger than those of known synthetic porphyrins. The electronic structures of these naturally occurring porphyrin derivatives are thus seen to be consistently different from those of the synthetic derivatives, the presumed consequence of the asymmetric peripheral substituent pattern. The molecular structure of [Fe(PPIX-DME)(NO)] has been determined by X-ray crystallography. Although disorder of the axial nitrosyl ligand limits the structural quality, this derivative appears to show the same subtle structural features as previously characterized five-coordinate nitrosyls. American Chemical Society 2014-03-12 2014-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3993899/ /pubmed/24620710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ic500086k Text en Copyright © 2014 American Chemical Society
spellingShingle Wyllie, Graeme R. A.
Silvernail, Nathan J.
Oliver, Allen G.
Schulz, Charles E.
Scheidt, W. Robert
Iron Nitrosyl “Natural” Porphyrinates: Does the Porphyrin Matter?
title Iron Nitrosyl “Natural” Porphyrinates: Does the Porphyrin Matter?
title_full Iron Nitrosyl “Natural” Porphyrinates: Does the Porphyrin Matter?
title_fullStr Iron Nitrosyl “Natural” Porphyrinates: Does the Porphyrin Matter?
title_full_unstemmed Iron Nitrosyl “Natural” Porphyrinates: Does the Porphyrin Matter?
title_short Iron Nitrosyl “Natural” Porphyrinates: Does the Porphyrin Matter?
title_sort iron nitrosyl “natural” porphyrinates: does the porphyrin matter?
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3993899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24620710
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ic500086k
work_keys_str_mv AT wylliegraemera ironnitrosylnaturalporphyrinatesdoestheporphyrinmatter
AT silvernailnathanj ironnitrosylnaturalporphyrinatesdoestheporphyrinmatter
AT oliveralleng ironnitrosylnaturalporphyrinatesdoestheporphyrinmatter
AT schulzcharlese ironnitrosylnaturalporphyrinatesdoestheporphyrinmatter
AT scheidtwrobert ironnitrosylnaturalporphyrinatesdoestheporphyrinmatter