Cargando…
Predictors of Esophageal Stricture Formation Post Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Stricture formation is a common complication after endoscopic mucosal resection. Predictors of stricture formation have not been well studied. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, observational, descriptive study by using a prospective endoscopic mucosal resection database in a te...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3994258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24765598 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2014.47.2.155 |
_version_ | 1782312697187008512 |
---|---|
author | Qumseya, Bashar Panossian, Abraham M. Rizk, Cynthia Cangemi, David Wolfsen, Christianne Raimondo, Massimo Woodward, Timothy Wallace, Michael B. Wolfsen, Herbert |
author_facet | Qumseya, Bashar Panossian, Abraham M. Rizk, Cynthia Cangemi, David Wolfsen, Christianne Raimondo, Massimo Woodward, Timothy Wallace, Michael B. Wolfsen, Herbert |
author_sort | Qumseya, Bashar |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: Stricture formation is a common complication after endoscopic mucosal resection. Predictors of stricture formation have not been well studied. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, observational, descriptive study by using a prospective endoscopic mucosal resection database in a tertiary referral center. For each patient, we extracted the age, sex, lesion size, use of ablative therapy, and detection of esophageal strictures. The primary outcome was the presence of esophageal stricture at follow-up. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the association between the primary outcome and predictors. RESULTS: Of 136 patients, 27% (n=37) had esophageal strictures. Thirty-two percent (n=44) needed endoscopic dilation to relieve dysphagia (median, 2; range, 1 to 8). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the size of the lesion excised is associated with increased odds of having a stricture (odds ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.3; p=0.01), when controlling for age, sex, and ablative modalities. Similarly, the number of lesions removed in the index procedure was associated with increased odds of developing a stricture (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.3 to 4.2; p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Stricture formation after esophageal endoscopic mucosal resection is common. Risk factors for stricture formation include large mucosal resections and the resection of multiple lesions on the initial procedure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3994258 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39942582014-04-24 Predictors of Esophageal Stricture Formation Post Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Qumseya, Bashar Panossian, Abraham M. Rizk, Cynthia Cangemi, David Wolfsen, Christianne Raimondo, Massimo Woodward, Timothy Wallace, Michael B. Wolfsen, Herbert Clin Endosc Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Stricture formation is a common complication after endoscopic mucosal resection. Predictors of stricture formation have not been well studied. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, observational, descriptive study by using a prospective endoscopic mucosal resection database in a tertiary referral center. For each patient, we extracted the age, sex, lesion size, use of ablative therapy, and detection of esophageal strictures. The primary outcome was the presence of esophageal stricture at follow-up. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the association between the primary outcome and predictors. RESULTS: Of 136 patients, 27% (n=37) had esophageal strictures. Thirty-two percent (n=44) needed endoscopic dilation to relieve dysphagia (median, 2; range, 1 to 8). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the size of the lesion excised is associated with increased odds of having a stricture (odds ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.3; p=0.01), when controlling for age, sex, and ablative modalities. Similarly, the number of lesions removed in the index procedure was associated with increased odds of developing a stricture (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.3 to 4.2; p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Stricture formation after esophageal endoscopic mucosal resection is common. Risk factors for stricture formation include large mucosal resections and the resection of multiple lesions on the initial procedure. The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2014-03 2014-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3994258/ /pubmed/24765598 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2014.47.2.155 Text en Copyright © 2014 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Qumseya, Bashar Panossian, Abraham M. Rizk, Cynthia Cangemi, David Wolfsen, Christianne Raimondo, Massimo Woodward, Timothy Wallace, Michael B. Wolfsen, Herbert Predictors of Esophageal Stricture Formation Post Endoscopic Mucosal Resection |
title | Predictors of Esophageal Stricture Formation Post Endoscopic Mucosal Resection |
title_full | Predictors of Esophageal Stricture Formation Post Endoscopic Mucosal Resection |
title_fullStr | Predictors of Esophageal Stricture Formation Post Endoscopic Mucosal Resection |
title_full_unstemmed | Predictors of Esophageal Stricture Formation Post Endoscopic Mucosal Resection |
title_short | Predictors of Esophageal Stricture Formation Post Endoscopic Mucosal Resection |
title_sort | predictors of esophageal stricture formation post endoscopic mucosal resection |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3994258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24765598 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2014.47.2.155 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT qumseyabashar predictorsofesophagealstrictureformationpostendoscopicmucosalresection AT panossianabrahamm predictorsofesophagealstrictureformationpostendoscopicmucosalresection AT rizkcynthia predictorsofesophagealstrictureformationpostendoscopicmucosalresection AT cangemidavid predictorsofesophagealstrictureformationpostendoscopicmucosalresection AT wolfsenchristianne predictorsofesophagealstrictureformationpostendoscopicmucosalresection AT raimondomassimo predictorsofesophagealstrictureformationpostendoscopicmucosalresection AT woodwardtimothy predictorsofesophagealstrictureformationpostendoscopicmucosalresection AT wallacemichaelb predictorsofesophagealstrictureformationpostendoscopicmucosalresection AT wolfsenherbert predictorsofesophagealstrictureformationpostendoscopicmucosalresection |