Cargando…

Misconduct in research: a descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing country

BACKGROUND: Misconduct in research tarnishes the reputation, credibility and integrity of research institutions. Studies on research or scientific misconduct are still novel in developing countries. In this study, we report on the attitudes, perceptions and factors related to the work environment th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Okonta, Patrick I, Rossouw, Theresa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3994284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24666413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-25
_version_ 1782312702422548480
author Okonta, Patrick I
Rossouw, Theresa
author_facet Okonta, Patrick I
Rossouw, Theresa
author_sort Okonta, Patrick I
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Misconduct in research tarnishes the reputation, credibility and integrity of research institutions. Studies on research or scientific misconduct are still novel in developing countries. In this study, we report on the attitudes, perceptions and factors related to the work environment thought to be associated with research misconduct in a group of researchers in Nigeria - a developing country. METHOD: A survey of researchers attending a scientific conference was done using an adapted Scientific Misconduct Questionnaire-Revised (SMQ-R). Initial descriptive analysis of individual items using frequencies and proportions for all quantitative data was performed. Thereafter, Likert scale responses were transformed into dichotomous responses. Fisher exact test was performed for associations as appropriate. A two-tailed p-value of less than 0.05 was accepted as significant. RESULT: Half of the respondents (50.4%) were aware of a colleague who had committed misconduct, defined as “non-adherence to rules, regulations, guidelines, and commonly accepted professional codes or norms”. Over 88% of the researchers were concerned about the perceived amount of misconduct prevalent in their institution and 96.2% believed that one or more forms of scientific misconduct had occurred in their workplace. More than half (52.7%) rated the severity of penalties for scientific misconduct in their work environment as low. Furthermore¸ the majority (56.1%) were of the view that the chance of getting caught for scientific misconduct in their work environment was low. CONCLUSION: Researchers in Nigeria perceive that scientific misconduct is commonplace in their institutions, but are however worried about the negative effects of scientific misconduct on the credibility of scientific research. We recommend that researchers be empowered with the knowledge and virtues necessary for self-regulation that advance research integrity. Research institutions should however also step into their role of fostering a responsible research ethic and discouraging misconduct.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3994284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39942842014-04-23 Misconduct in research: a descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing country Okonta, Patrick I Rossouw, Theresa BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: Misconduct in research tarnishes the reputation, credibility and integrity of research institutions. Studies on research or scientific misconduct are still novel in developing countries. In this study, we report on the attitudes, perceptions and factors related to the work environment thought to be associated with research misconduct in a group of researchers in Nigeria - a developing country. METHOD: A survey of researchers attending a scientific conference was done using an adapted Scientific Misconduct Questionnaire-Revised (SMQ-R). Initial descriptive analysis of individual items using frequencies and proportions for all quantitative data was performed. Thereafter, Likert scale responses were transformed into dichotomous responses. Fisher exact test was performed for associations as appropriate. A two-tailed p-value of less than 0.05 was accepted as significant. RESULT: Half of the respondents (50.4%) were aware of a colleague who had committed misconduct, defined as “non-adherence to rules, regulations, guidelines, and commonly accepted professional codes or norms”. Over 88% of the researchers were concerned about the perceived amount of misconduct prevalent in their institution and 96.2% believed that one or more forms of scientific misconduct had occurred in their workplace. More than half (52.7%) rated the severity of penalties for scientific misconduct in their work environment as low. Furthermore¸ the majority (56.1%) were of the view that the chance of getting caught for scientific misconduct in their work environment was low. CONCLUSION: Researchers in Nigeria perceive that scientific misconduct is commonplace in their institutions, but are however worried about the negative effects of scientific misconduct on the credibility of scientific research. We recommend that researchers be empowered with the knowledge and virtues necessary for self-regulation that advance research integrity. Research institutions should however also step into their role of fostering a responsible research ethic and discouraging misconduct. BioMed Central 2014-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3994284/ /pubmed/24666413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-25 Text en Copyright © 2014 Okonta and Rossouw; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Okonta, Patrick I
Rossouw, Theresa
Misconduct in research: a descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing country
title Misconduct in research: a descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing country
title_full Misconduct in research: a descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing country
title_fullStr Misconduct in research: a descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing country
title_full_unstemmed Misconduct in research: a descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing country
title_short Misconduct in research: a descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing country
title_sort misconduct in research: a descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing country
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3994284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24666413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-25
work_keys_str_mv AT okontapatricki misconductinresearchadescriptivesurveyofattitudesperceptionsandassociatedfactorsinadevelopingcountry
AT rossouwtheresa misconductinresearchadescriptivesurveyofattitudesperceptionsandassociatedfactorsinadevelopingcountry