Cargando…

Lung cancer with chest wall invasion: retrospective analysis comparing en-bloc resection and ‘resection in bird cage’

BACKGROUND: Invasion of the chest wall per se is not a contraindication for tumor resection in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), provided there is no mediastinal lymph node or vital structure involvement. Although widely known to Brazilian surgeons, the ‘resection in bird cage’ technique has never...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Santos, Heron Teixeira Andrade, Lopes, Agnaldo José, Higa, Cláudio, Nunes, Rodolfo Acatauassú, Saito, Eduardo Haruo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3994400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24655354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-9-57
_version_ 1782312719150481408
author Santos, Heron Teixeira Andrade
Lopes, Agnaldo José
Higa, Cláudio
Nunes, Rodolfo Acatauassú
Saito, Eduardo Haruo
author_facet Santos, Heron Teixeira Andrade
Lopes, Agnaldo José
Higa, Cláudio
Nunes, Rodolfo Acatauassú
Saito, Eduardo Haruo
author_sort Santos, Heron Teixeira Andrade
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Invasion of the chest wall per se is not a contraindication for tumor resection in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), provided there is no mediastinal lymph node or vital structure involvement. Although widely known to Brazilian surgeons, the ‘resection in bird cage’ technique has never been widely studied in terms of patient survival. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the postoperative consequences and overall survival of extra-musculoperiosteal resection compared with en-bloc resection in NSCLC patients with invasion of the endothoracic fascia. METHODS: Between January 1990 and December 2009, 33 NSCLC patients with invasion of the thoracic wall who underwent pulmonary resection were retrospectively analyzed. Of the 33 patients evaluated, 20 patients underwent en-bloc resection and 13 underwent ‘resection in bird cage.’ For each patient, a retrospective case note review was made. RESULTS: The median age at surgery, gender, indication, rate of comorbidities, tumor size and the degree of uptake in the costal margin were similar for both groups. The rate of postoperative complications and the duration of hospitalization did not differ between the groups. Regarding the outcome variables, the disease-free interval, rate of local recurrence, metastasis-free time after surgery, overall mortality rate, mortality rate related to metastatic disease, duration following surgery in which deaths occurred, and overall survival were also similar between groups. The cumulative survival curves between the ‘resection in bird cage’ and en-bloc resection and between stages Ia + Ib and IIb + IIIa + IV were not significantly different (p = 0.68 and p = 0.64, respectively). The cumulative metastasis-free survival curves were not significantly different between the two types of surgery (p = 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: In NSCLC patients with invasion of the endothoracic fascia, ‘resection in bird cage’ is a less aggressive procedure that yields similar results in terms of morbidity and mortality compared with en-bloc resection. Thus, ‘resection in bird cage’ meets the oncologic principles of resection and does not adversely affect the patients in terms of cure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3994400
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39944002014-04-23 Lung cancer with chest wall invasion: retrospective analysis comparing en-bloc resection and ‘resection in bird cage’ Santos, Heron Teixeira Andrade Lopes, Agnaldo José Higa, Cláudio Nunes, Rodolfo Acatauassú Saito, Eduardo Haruo J Cardiothorac Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Invasion of the chest wall per se is not a contraindication for tumor resection in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), provided there is no mediastinal lymph node or vital structure involvement. Although widely known to Brazilian surgeons, the ‘resection in bird cage’ technique has never been widely studied in terms of patient survival. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the postoperative consequences and overall survival of extra-musculoperiosteal resection compared with en-bloc resection in NSCLC patients with invasion of the endothoracic fascia. METHODS: Between January 1990 and December 2009, 33 NSCLC patients with invasion of the thoracic wall who underwent pulmonary resection were retrospectively analyzed. Of the 33 patients evaluated, 20 patients underwent en-bloc resection and 13 underwent ‘resection in bird cage.’ For each patient, a retrospective case note review was made. RESULTS: The median age at surgery, gender, indication, rate of comorbidities, tumor size and the degree of uptake in the costal margin were similar for both groups. The rate of postoperative complications and the duration of hospitalization did not differ between the groups. Regarding the outcome variables, the disease-free interval, rate of local recurrence, metastasis-free time after surgery, overall mortality rate, mortality rate related to metastatic disease, duration following surgery in which deaths occurred, and overall survival were also similar between groups. The cumulative survival curves between the ‘resection in bird cage’ and en-bloc resection and between stages Ia + Ib and IIb + IIIa + IV were not significantly different (p = 0.68 and p = 0.64, respectively). The cumulative metastasis-free survival curves were not significantly different between the two types of surgery (p = 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: In NSCLC patients with invasion of the endothoracic fascia, ‘resection in bird cage’ is a less aggressive procedure that yields similar results in terms of morbidity and mortality compared with en-bloc resection. Thus, ‘resection in bird cage’ meets the oncologic principles of resection and does not adversely affect the patients in terms of cure. BioMed Central 2014-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3994400/ /pubmed/24655354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-9-57 Text en Copyright © 2014 Santos et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Santos, Heron Teixeira Andrade
Lopes, Agnaldo José
Higa, Cláudio
Nunes, Rodolfo Acatauassú
Saito, Eduardo Haruo
Lung cancer with chest wall invasion: retrospective analysis comparing en-bloc resection and ‘resection in bird cage’
title Lung cancer with chest wall invasion: retrospective analysis comparing en-bloc resection and ‘resection in bird cage’
title_full Lung cancer with chest wall invasion: retrospective analysis comparing en-bloc resection and ‘resection in bird cage’
title_fullStr Lung cancer with chest wall invasion: retrospective analysis comparing en-bloc resection and ‘resection in bird cage’
title_full_unstemmed Lung cancer with chest wall invasion: retrospective analysis comparing en-bloc resection and ‘resection in bird cage’
title_short Lung cancer with chest wall invasion: retrospective analysis comparing en-bloc resection and ‘resection in bird cage’
title_sort lung cancer with chest wall invasion: retrospective analysis comparing en-bloc resection and ‘resection in bird cage’
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3994400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24655354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-9-57
work_keys_str_mv AT santosheronteixeiraandrade lungcancerwithchestwallinvasionretrospectiveanalysiscomparingenblocresectionandresectioninbirdcage
AT lopesagnaldojose lungcancerwithchestwallinvasionretrospectiveanalysiscomparingenblocresectionandresectioninbirdcage
AT higaclaudio lungcancerwithchestwallinvasionretrospectiveanalysiscomparingenblocresectionandresectioninbirdcage
AT nunesrodolfoacatauassu lungcancerwithchestwallinvasionretrospectiveanalysiscomparingenblocresectionandresectioninbirdcage
AT saitoeduardoharuo lungcancerwithchestwallinvasionretrospectiveanalysiscomparingenblocresectionandresectioninbirdcage