Cargando…

Clinical decision support improves quality of telephone triage documentation - an analysis of triage documentation before and after computerized clinical decision support

BACKGROUND: Clinical decision support (CDS) has been shown to be effective in improving medical safety and quality but there is little information on how telephone triage benefits from CDS. The aim of our study was to compare triage documentation quality associated with the use of a clinical decisio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: North, Frederick, Richards, Debra D, Bremseth, Kimberly A, Lee, Mary R, Cox, Debra L, Varkey, Prathibha, Stroebel, Robert J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3994475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24645674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-14-20
_version_ 1782312733328277504
author North, Frederick
Richards, Debra D
Bremseth, Kimberly A
Lee, Mary R
Cox, Debra L
Varkey, Prathibha
Stroebel, Robert J
author_facet North, Frederick
Richards, Debra D
Bremseth, Kimberly A
Lee, Mary R
Cox, Debra L
Varkey, Prathibha
Stroebel, Robert J
author_sort North, Frederick
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical decision support (CDS) has been shown to be effective in improving medical safety and quality but there is little information on how telephone triage benefits from CDS. The aim of our study was to compare triage documentation quality associated with the use of a clinical decision support tool, ExpertRN(©). METHODS: We examined 50 triage documents before and after a CDS tool was used in nursing triage. To control for the effects of CDS training we had an additional control group of triage documents created by nurses who were trained in the CDS tool, but who did not use it in selected notes. The CDS intervention cohort of triage notes was compared to both the pre-CDS notes and the CDS trained (but not using CDS) cohort. Cohorts were compared using the documentation standards of the American Academy of Ambulatory Care Nursing (AAACN). We also compared triage note content (documentation of associated positive and negative features relating to the symptoms, self-care instructions, and warning signs to watch for), and documentation defects pertinent to triage safety. RESULTS: Three of five AAACN documentation standards were significantly improved with CDS. There was a mean of 36.7 symptom features documented in triage notes for the CDS group but only 10.7 symptom features in the pre-CDS cohort (p < 0.0001) and 10.2 for the cohort that was CDS-trained but not using CDS (p < 0.0001). The difference between the mean of 10.2 symptom features documented in the pre-CDS and the mean of 10.7 symptom features documented in the CDS-trained but not using was not statistically significant (p = 0.68). CONCLUSIONS: CDS significantly improves triage note documentation quality. CDS-aided triage notes had significantly more information about symptoms, warning signs and self-care. The changes in triage documentation appeared to be the result of the CDS alone and not due to any CDS training that came with the CDS intervention. Although this study shows that CDS can improve documentation, further study is needed to determine if it results in improved care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3994475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39944752014-04-23 Clinical decision support improves quality of telephone triage documentation - an analysis of triage documentation before and after computerized clinical decision support North, Frederick Richards, Debra D Bremseth, Kimberly A Lee, Mary R Cox, Debra L Varkey, Prathibha Stroebel, Robert J BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Clinical decision support (CDS) has been shown to be effective in improving medical safety and quality but there is little information on how telephone triage benefits from CDS. The aim of our study was to compare triage documentation quality associated with the use of a clinical decision support tool, ExpertRN(©). METHODS: We examined 50 triage documents before and after a CDS tool was used in nursing triage. To control for the effects of CDS training we had an additional control group of triage documents created by nurses who were trained in the CDS tool, but who did not use it in selected notes. The CDS intervention cohort of triage notes was compared to both the pre-CDS notes and the CDS trained (but not using CDS) cohort. Cohorts were compared using the documentation standards of the American Academy of Ambulatory Care Nursing (AAACN). We also compared triage note content (documentation of associated positive and negative features relating to the symptoms, self-care instructions, and warning signs to watch for), and documentation defects pertinent to triage safety. RESULTS: Three of five AAACN documentation standards were significantly improved with CDS. There was a mean of 36.7 symptom features documented in triage notes for the CDS group but only 10.7 symptom features in the pre-CDS cohort (p < 0.0001) and 10.2 for the cohort that was CDS-trained but not using CDS (p < 0.0001). The difference between the mean of 10.2 symptom features documented in the pre-CDS and the mean of 10.7 symptom features documented in the CDS-trained but not using was not statistically significant (p = 0.68). CONCLUSIONS: CDS significantly improves triage note documentation quality. CDS-aided triage notes had significantly more information about symptoms, warning signs and self-care. The changes in triage documentation appeared to be the result of the CDS alone and not due to any CDS training that came with the CDS intervention. Although this study shows that CDS can improve documentation, further study is needed to determine if it results in improved care. BioMed Central 2014-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3994475/ /pubmed/24645674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-14-20 Text en Copyright © 2014 North et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
North, Frederick
Richards, Debra D
Bremseth, Kimberly A
Lee, Mary R
Cox, Debra L
Varkey, Prathibha
Stroebel, Robert J
Clinical decision support improves quality of telephone triage documentation - an analysis of triage documentation before and after computerized clinical decision support
title Clinical decision support improves quality of telephone triage documentation - an analysis of triage documentation before and after computerized clinical decision support
title_full Clinical decision support improves quality of telephone triage documentation - an analysis of triage documentation before and after computerized clinical decision support
title_fullStr Clinical decision support improves quality of telephone triage documentation - an analysis of triage documentation before and after computerized clinical decision support
title_full_unstemmed Clinical decision support improves quality of telephone triage documentation - an analysis of triage documentation before and after computerized clinical decision support
title_short Clinical decision support improves quality of telephone triage documentation - an analysis of triage documentation before and after computerized clinical decision support
title_sort clinical decision support improves quality of telephone triage documentation - an analysis of triage documentation before and after computerized clinical decision support
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3994475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24645674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-14-20
work_keys_str_mv AT northfrederick clinicaldecisionsupportimprovesqualityoftelephonetriagedocumentationananalysisoftriagedocumentationbeforeandaftercomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupport
AT richardsdebrad clinicaldecisionsupportimprovesqualityoftelephonetriagedocumentationananalysisoftriagedocumentationbeforeandaftercomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupport
AT bremsethkimberlya clinicaldecisionsupportimprovesqualityoftelephonetriagedocumentationananalysisoftriagedocumentationbeforeandaftercomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupport
AT leemaryr clinicaldecisionsupportimprovesqualityoftelephonetriagedocumentationananalysisoftriagedocumentationbeforeandaftercomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupport
AT coxdebral clinicaldecisionsupportimprovesqualityoftelephonetriagedocumentationananalysisoftriagedocumentationbeforeandaftercomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupport
AT varkeyprathibha clinicaldecisionsupportimprovesqualityoftelephonetriagedocumentationananalysisoftriagedocumentationbeforeandaftercomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupport
AT stroebelrobertj clinicaldecisionsupportimprovesqualityoftelephonetriagedocumentationananalysisoftriagedocumentationbeforeandaftercomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupport