Cargando…

RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF AN ACCELEROMETRIC SYSTEM FOR ASSESSING VERTICAL JUMPING PERFORMANCE

The validity of an accelerometric system (Myotest©) for assessing vertical jump height, vertical force and power, leg stiffness and reactivity index was examined. 20 healthy males performed 3ד5 hops in place”, 3ד1 squat jump” and 3× “1 countermovement jump” during 2 test-retest sessions. The varia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choukou, M.-A., Laffaye, G., Taiar, R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Institute of Sport in Warsaw 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3994586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24917690
http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/20831862.1086733
_version_ 1782312754384732160
author Choukou, M.-A.
Laffaye, G.
Taiar, R.
author_facet Choukou, M.-A.
Laffaye, G.
Taiar, R.
author_sort Choukou, M.-A.
collection PubMed
description The validity of an accelerometric system (Myotest©) for assessing vertical jump height, vertical force and power, leg stiffness and reactivity index was examined. 20 healthy males performed 3ד5 hops in place”, 3ד1 squat jump” and 3× “1 countermovement jump” during 2 test-retest sessions. The variables were simultaneously assessed using an accelerometer and a force platform at a frequency of 0.5 and 1 kHz, respectively. Both reliability and validity of the accelerometric system were studied. No significant differences between test and retest data were found (p < 0.05), showing a high level of reliability. Besides, moderate to high intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) (from 0.74 to 0.96) were obtained for all variables whereas weak to moderate ICCs (from 0.29 to 0.79) were obtained for force and power during the countermovement jump. With regards to validity, the difference between the two devices was not significant for 5 hops in place height (1.8 cm), force during squat (-1.4 N · kg(−1)) and countermovement (0.1 N · kg(−1)) jumps, leg stiffness (7.8 kN · m(−1)) and reactivity index (0.4). So, the measurements of these variables with this accelerometer are valid, which is not the case for the other variables. The main causes of non-validity for velocity, power and contact time assessment are temporal biases of the takeoff and touchdown moments detection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3994586
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Institute of Sport in Warsaw
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39945862014-06-10 RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF AN ACCELEROMETRIC SYSTEM FOR ASSESSING VERTICAL JUMPING PERFORMANCE Choukou, M.-A. Laffaye, G. Taiar, R. Biol Sport Original Article The validity of an accelerometric system (Myotest©) for assessing vertical jump height, vertical force and power, leg stiffness and reactivity index was examined. 20 healthy males performed 3ד5 hops in place”, 3ד1 squat jump” and 3× “1 countermovement jump” during 2 test-retest sessions. The variables were simultaneously assessed using an accelerometer and a force platform at a frequency of 0.5 and 1 kHz, respectively. Both reliability and validity of the accelerometric system were studied. No significant differences between test and retest data were found (p < 0.05), showing a high level of reliability. Besides, moderate to high intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) (from 0.74 to 0.96) were obtained for all variables whereas weak to moderate ICCs (from 0.29 to 0.79) were obtained for force and power during the countermovement jump. With regards to validity, the difference between the two devices was not significant for 5 hops in place height (1.8 cm), force during squat (-1.4 N · kg(−1)) and countermovement (0.1 N · kg(−1)) jumps, leg stiffness (7.8 kN · m(−1)) and reactivity index (0.4). So, the measurements of these variables with this accelerometer are valid, which is not the case for the other variables. The main causes of non-validity for velocity, power and contact time assessment are temporal biases of the takeoff and touchdown moments detection. Institute of Sport in Warsaw 2014-01-22 2014-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3994586/ /pubmed/24917690 http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/20831862.1086733 Text en Copyright © Biology of Sport 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Choukou, M.-A.
Laffaye, G.
Taiar, R.
RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF AN ACCELEROMETRIC SYSTEM FOR ASSESSING VERTICAL JUMPING PERFORMANCE
title RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF AN ACCELEROMETRIC SYSTEM FOR ASSESSING VERTICAL JUMPING PERFORMANCE
title_full RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF AN ACCELEROMETRIC SYSTEM FOR ASSESSING VERTICAL JUMPING PERFORMANCE
title_fullStr RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF AN ACCELEROMETRIC SYSTEM FOR ASSESSING VERTICAL JUMPING PERFORMANCE
title_full_unstemmed RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF AN ACCELEROMETRIC SYSTEM FOR ASSESSING VERTICAL JUMPING PERFORMANCE
title_short RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF AN ACCELEROMETRIC SYSTEM FOR ASSESSING VERTICAL JUMPING PERFORMANCE
title_sort reliability and validity of an accelerometric system for assessing vertical jumping performance
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3994586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24917690
http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/20831862.1086733
work_keys_str_mv AT choukouma reliabilityandvalidityofanaccelerometricsystemforassessingverticaljumpingperformance
AT laffayeg reliabilityandvalidityofanaccelerometricsystemforassessingverticaljumpingperformance
AT taiarr reliabilityandvalidityofanaccelerometricsystemforassessingverticaljumpingperformance