Cargando…

Dural adhesion to porous cranioplastic implant: A potential safety concern

BACKGROUND: Patient-specific implants are used for cranioplastic skull reconstruction when large bone flaps must be replaced or where there are complex or critical contours, especially near the face. These implants have a low complication rate, with poor fit and postoperative infection being the mos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sayama, Christina M., Sorour, Mohammad, Schmidt, Richard H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3994682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24778907
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.127377
_version_ 1782312774082232320
author Sayama, Christina M.
Sorour, Mohammad
Schmidt, Richard H.
author_facet Sayama, Christina M.
Sorour, Mohammad
Schmidt, Richard H.
author_sort Sayama, Christina M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient-specific implants are used for cranioplastic skull reconstruction when large bone flaps must be replaced or where there are complex or critical contours, especially near the face. These implants have a low complication rate, with poor fit and postoperative infection being the most common complications. We report here a potentially serious hazard that may arise from the use of porous implants. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 45-year-old woman sustained severe head trauma in a motor vehicle accident that required urgent surgical intervention. Because of progressive resorption of her native bone flap, she underwent replacement of her native flap with a hard tissue replacement/patient-matched implant cranioplasty. Eight years later, she sustained a traumatic laceration over her vertex that necessitated removal of her cranioplastic implant because of persistent local infection. Intraoperatively, the dural flap was ingrowing and firmly adherent to the inside surface of the porous cranioplasty. After several failed attempts to remove the whole implant piecemeal, we attempted to dissect the dural flap from the brain surface to remove it together with the cranioplastic implant but exposure of the extensive cortical adhesions between the brain surface and the dural flap was compromised by the hard overlying cranioplastic implant. Despite our meticulous attempts to cut off these cortical adhesions, a perisylvian blood vessel was avulsed, resulting in intraparenchymal hemorrhage. CONCLUSION: In this case, dural adhesion and ingrowth to the underside of the cranioplasty implant led to disastrous bleeding when the implant needed to be removed years after initial implantation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3994682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39946822014-04-28 Dural adhesion to porous cranioplastic implant: A potential safety concern Sayama, Christina M. Sorour, Mohammad Schmidt, Richard H. Surg Neurol Int Case Report BACKGROUND: Patient-specific implants are used for cranioplastic skull reconstruction when large bone flaps must be replaced or where there are complex or critical contours, especially near the face. These implants have a low complication rate, with poor fit and postoperative infection being the most common complications. We report here a potentially serious hazard that may arise from the use of porous implants. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 45-year-old woman sustained severe head trauma in a motor vehicle accident that required urgent surgical intervention. Because of progressive resorption of her native bone flap, she underwent replacement of her native flap with a hard tissue replacement/patient-matched implant cranioplasty. Eight years later, she sustained a traumatic laceration over her vertex that necessitated removal of her cranioplastic implant because of persistent local infection. Intraoperatively, the dural flap was ingrowing and firmly adherent to the inside surface of the porous cranioplasty. After several failed attempts to remove the whole implant piecemeal, we attempted to dissect the dural flap from the brain surface to remove it together with the cranioplastic implant but exposure of the extensive cortical adhesions between the brain surface and the dural flap was compromised by the hard overlying cranioplastic implant. Despite our meticulous attempts to cut off these cortical adhesions, a perisylvian blood vessel was avulsed, resulting in intraparenchymal hemorrhage. CONCLUSION: In this case, dural adhesion and ingrowth to the underside of the cranioplasty implant led to disastrous bleeding when the implant needed to be removed years after initial implantation. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3994682/ /pubmed/24778907 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.127377 Text en Copyright: © 2014 Sayama CM. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Case Report
Sayama, Christina M.
Sorour, Mohammad
Schmidt, Richard H.
Dural adhesion to porous cranioplastic implant: A potential safety concern
title Dural adhesion to porous cranioplastic implant: A potential safety concern
title_full Dural adhesion to porous cranioplastic implant: A potential safety concern
title_fullStr Dural adhesion to porous cranioplastic implant: A potential safety concern
title_full_unstemmed Dural adhesion to porous cranioplastic implant: A potential safety concern
title_short Dural adhesion to porous cranioplastic implant: A potential safety concern
title_sort dural adhesion to porous cranioplastic implant: a potential safety concern
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3994682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24778907
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.127377
work_keys_str_mv AT sayamachristinam duraladhesiontoporouscranioplasticimplantapotentialsafetyconcern
AT sorourmohammad duraladhesiontoporouscranioplasticimplantapotentialsafetyconcern
AT schmidtrichardh duraladhesiontoporouscranioplasticimplantapotentialsafetyconcern