Cargando…

Minimally invasive posterior cervical decompression using tubular retractor: The technical note and early clinical outcome

BACKGROUND: The aim of this work is to present a novel decompression technique that approaches cervical spine posteriorly, but through minimal invasive method using tubular retractor avoiding detachment of posterior musculature. METHODS: Six patients underwent minimally invasive posterior cervical d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hur, Jung-Woo, Kim, Jin-Sung, Shin, Myeong-Hoon, Ryu, Kyeong-Sik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3994691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24778922
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.128915
_version_ 1782312776157364224
author Hur, Jung-Woo
Kim, Jin-Sung
Shin, Myeong-Hoon
Ryu, Kyeong-Sik
author_facet Hur, Jung-Woo
Kim, Jin-Sung
Shin, Myeong-Hoon
Ryu, Kyeong-Sik
author_sort Hur, Jung-Woo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this work is to present a novel decompression technique that approaches cervical spine posteriorly, but through minimal invasive method using tubular retractor avoiding detachment of posterior musculature. METHODS: Six patients underwent minimally invasive posterior cervical decompression using the tubular retractor system and surgical microscope. Minimally invasive access to the posterior cervical spine was performed with exposure through a paramedian muscle-splitting approach. With the assistance of a specialized tubular retraction system and deep soft tissue expansion mechanism, multilevel posterior cervical decompression could be accomplished. This approach also allows safe docking of the retractor system on the lateral mass, thus avoiding the cervical spinal canal during exposure. A standard operating microscope was used with ×10 magnification and 400 mm focal length. The hospital charts, magnetic resonance imaging studies, and follow-up records of all the patients were reviewed. Outcome was assessed by neurological status and visual analog scale (VAS) for neck and arm pain. RESULTS: There was no significant complication related to operation. The follow-up time was 4-12 months (mean, 9 months). Muscle weakness improved in all patients; sensory deficits resolved in four patients and improved in two patients. Analysis of the mean VAS for radicular pain and VAS for neck pain showed significant improvement. CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary experiences with good clinical outcome seem to promise that this minimally invasive technique is a valid alternative option for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3994691
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39946912014-04-28 Minimally invasive posterior cervical decompression using tubular retractor: The technical note and early clinical outcome Hur, Jung-Woo Kim, Jin-Sung Shin, Myeong-Hoon Ryu, Kyeong-Sik Surg Neurol Int Technical Note BACKGROUND: The aim of this work is to present a novel decompression technique that approaches cervical spine posteriorly, but through minimal invasive method using tubular retractor avoiding detachment of posterior musculature. METHODS: Six patients underwent minimally invasive posterior cervical decompression using the tubular retractor system and surgical microscope. Minimally invasive access to the posterior cervical spine was performed with exposure through a paramedian muscle-splitting approach. With the assistance of a specialized tubular retraction system and deep soft tissue expansion mechanism, multilevel posterior cervical decompression could be accomplished. This approach also allows safe docking of the retractor system on the lateral mass, thus avoiding the cervical spinal canal during exposure. A standard operating microscope was used with ×10 magnification and 400 mm focal length. The hospital charts, magnetic resonance imaging studies, and follow-up records of all the patients were reviewed. Outcome was assessed by neurological status and visual analog scale (VAS) for neck and arm pain. RESULTS: There was no significant complication related to operation. The follow-up time was 4-12 months (mean, 9 months). Muscle weakness improved in all patients; sensory deficits resolved in four patients and improved in two patients. Analysis of the mean VAS for radicular pain and VAS for neck pain showed significant improvement. CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary experiences with good clinical outcome seem to promise that this minimally invasive technique is a valid alternative option for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3994691/ /pubmed/24778922 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.128915 Text en Copyright: © 2014 Hur J. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Technical Note
Hur, Jung-Woo
Kim, Jin-Sung
Shin, Myeong-Hoon
Ryu, Kyeong-Sik
Minimally invasive posterior cervical decompression using tubular retractor: The technical note and early clinical outcome
title Minimally invasive posterior cervical decompression using tubular retractor: The technical note and early clinical outcome
title_full Minimally invasive posterior cervical decompression using tubular retractor: The technical note and early clinical outcome
title_fullStr Minimally invasive posterior cervical decompression using tubular retractor: The technical note and early clinical outcome
title_full_unstemmed Minimally invasive posterior cervical decompression using tubular retractor: The technical note and early clinical outcome
title_short Minimally invasive posterior cervical decompression using tubular retractor: The technical note and early clinical outcome
title_sort minimally invasive posterior cervical decompression using tubular retractor: the technical note and early clinical outcome
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3994691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24778922
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.128915
work_keys_str_mv AT hurjungwoo minimallyinvasiveposteriorcervicaldecompressionusingtubularretractorthetechnicalnoteandearlyclinicaloutcome
AT kimjinsung minimallyinvasiveposteriorcervicaldecompressionusingtubularretractorthetechnicalnoteandearlyclinicaloutcome
AT shinmyeonghoon minimallyinvasiveposteriorcervicaldecompressionusingtubularretractorthetechnicalnoteandearlyclinicaloutcome
AT ryukyeongsik minimallyinvasiveposteriorcervicaldecompressionusingtubularretractorthetechnicalnoteandearlyclinicaloutcome