Cargando…
National evaluation of the benefits and risks of greater structuring and coding of the electronic health record: exploratory qualitative investigation
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore stakeholder views, attitudes, needs, and expectations regarding likely benefits and risks resulting from increased structuring and coding of clinical information within electronic health records (EHRs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Qualitative investigation in primary and se...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3994848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24186957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001666 |
_version_ | 1782312790935994368 |
---|---|
author | Morrison, Zoe Fernando, Bernard Kalra, Dipak Cresswell, Kathrin Sheikh, Aziz |
author_facet | Morrison, Zoe Fernando, Bernard Kalra, Dipak Cresswell, Kathrin Sheikh, Aziz |
author_sort | Morrison, Zoe |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore stakeholder views, attitudes, needs, and expectations regarding likely benefits and risks resulting from increased structuring and coding of clinical information within electronic health records (EHRs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Qualitative investigation in primary and secondary care and research settings throughout the UK. Data were derived from interviews, expert discussion groups, observations, and relevant documents. Participants (n=70) included patients, healthcare professionals, health service commissioners, policy makers, managers, administrators, systems developers, researchers, and academics. RESULTS: Four main themes arose from our data: variations in documentation practice; patient care benefits; secondary uses of information; and informing and involving patients. We observed a lack of guidelines, co-ordination, and dissemination of best practice relating to the design and use of information structures. While we identified immediate benefits for direct care and secondary analysis, many healthcare professionals did not see the relevance of structured and/or coded data to clinical practice. The potential for structured information to increase patient understanding of their diagnosis and treatment contrasted with concerns regarding the appropriateness of coded information for patients. CONCLUSIONS: The design and development of EHRs requires the capture of narrative information to reflect patient/clinician communication and computable data for administration and research purposes. Increased structuring and/or coding of EHRs therefore offers both benefits and risks. Documentation standards within clinical guidelines are likely to encourage comprehensive, accurate processing of data. As data structures may impact upon clinician/patient interactions, new models of documentation may be necessary if EHRs are to be read and authored by patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3994848 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39948482014-04-22 National evaluation of the benefits and risks of greater structuring and coding of the electronic health record: exploratory qualitative investigation Morrison, Zoe Fernando, Bernard Kalra, Dipak Cresswell, Kathrin Sheikh, Aziz J Am Med Inform Assoc Research and Applications OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore stakeholder views, attitudes, needs, and expectations regarding likely benefits and risks resulting from increased structuring and coding of clinical information within electronic health records (EHRs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Qualitative investigation in primary and secondary care and research settings throughout the UK. Data were derived from interviews, expert discussion groups, observations, and relevant documents. Participants (n=70) included patients, healthcare professionals, health service commissioners, policy makers, managers, administrators, systems developers, researchers, and academics. RESULTS: Four main themes arose from our data: variations in documentation practice; patient care benefits; secondary uses of information; and informing and involving patients. We observed a lack of guidelines, co-ordination, and dissemination of best practice relating to the design and use of information structures. While we identified immediate benefits for direct care and secondary analysis, many healthcare professionals did not see the relevance of structured and/or coded data to clinical practice. The potential for structured information to increase patient understanding of their diagnosis and treatment contrasted with concerns regarding the appropriateness of coded information for patients. CONCLUSIONS: The design and development of EHRs requires the capture of narrative information to reflect patient/clinician communication and computable data for administration and research purposes. Increased structuring and/or coding of EHRs therefore offers both benefits and risks. Documentation standards within clinical guidelines are likely to encourage comprehensive, accurate processing of data. As data structures may impact upon clinician/patient interactions, new models of documentation may be necessary if EHRs are to be read and authored by patients. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-05 2013-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3994848/ /pubmed/24186957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001666 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Research and Applications Morrison, Zoe Fernando, Bernard Kalra, Dipak Cresswell, Kathrin Sheikh, Aziz National evaluation of the benefits and risks of greater structuring and coding of the electronic health record: exploratory qualitative investigation |
title | National evaluation of the benefits and risks of greater structuring and coding of the electronic health record: exploratory qualitative investigation |
title_full | National evaluation of the benefits and risks of greater structuring and coding of the electronic health record: exploratory qualitative investigation |
title_fullStr | National evaluation of the benefits and risks of greater structuring and coding of the electronic health record: exploratory qualitative investigation |
title_full_unstemmed | National evaluation of the benefits and risks of greater structuring and coding of the electronic health record: exploratory qualitative investigation |
title_short | National evaluation of the benefits and risks of greater structuring and coding of the electronic health record: exploratory qualitative investigation |
title_sort | national evaluation of the benefits and risks of greater structuring and coding of the electronic health record: exploratory qualitative investigation |
topic | Research and Applications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3994848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24186957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001666 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT morrisonzoe nationalevaluationofthebenefitsandrisksofgreaterstructuringandcodingoftheelectronichealthrecordexploratoryqualitativeinvestigation AT fernandobernard nationalevaluationofthebenefitsandrisksofgreaterstructuringandcodingoftheelectronichealthrecordexploratoryqualitativeinvestigation AT kalradipak nationalevaluationofthebenefitsandrisksofgreaterstructuringandcodingoftheelectronichealthrecordexploratoryqualitativeinvestigation AT cresswellkathrin nationalevaluationofthebenefitsandrisksofgreaterstructuringandcodingoftheelectronichealthrecordexploratoryqualitativeinvestigation AT sheikhaziz nationalevaluationofthebenefitsandrisksofgreaterstructuringandcodingoftheelectronichealthrecordexploratoryqualitativeinvestigation |