Cargando…

National evaluation of the benefits and risks of greater structuring and coding of the electronic health record: exploratory qualitative investigation

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore stakeholder views, attitudes, needs, and expectations regarding likely benefits and risks resulting from increased structuring and coding of clinical information within electronic health records (EHRs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Qualitative investigation in primary and se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morrison, Zoe, Fernando, Bernard, Kalra, Dipak, Cresswell, Kathrin, Sheikh, Aziz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3994848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24186957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001666
_version_ 1782312790935994368
author Morrison, Zoe
Fernando, Bernard
Kalra, Dipak
Cresswell, Kathrin
Sheikh, Aziz
author_facet Morrison, Zoe
Fernando, Bernard
Kalra, Dipak
Cresswell, Kathrin
Sheikh, Aziz
author_sort Morrison, Zoe
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore stakeholder views, attitudes, needs, and expectations regarding likely benefits and risks resulting from increased structuring and coding of clinical information within electronic health records (EHRs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Qualitative investigation in primary and secondary care and research settings throughout the UK. Data were derived from interviews, expert discussion groups, observations, and relevant documents. Participants (n=70) included patients, healthcare professionals, health service commissioners, policy makers, managers, administrators, systems developers, researchers, and academics. RESULTS: Four main themes arose from our data: variations in documentation practice; patient care benefits; secondary uses of information; and informing and involving patients. We observed a lack of guidelines, co-ordination, and dissemination of best practice relating to the design and use of information structures. While we identified immediate benefits for direct care and secondary analysis, many healthcare professionals did not see the relevance of structured and/or coded data to clinical practice. The potential for structured information to increase patient understanding of their diagnosis and treatment contrasted with concerns regarding the appropriateness of coded information for patients. CONCLUSIONS: The design and development of EHRs requires the capture of narrative information to reflect patient/clinician communication and computable data for administration and research purposes. Increased structuring and/or coding of EHRs therefore offers both benefits and risks. Documentation standards within clinical guidelines are likely to encourage comprehensive, accurate processing of data. As data structures may impact upon clinician/patient interactions, new models of documentation may be necessary if EHRs are to be read and authored by patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3994848
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39948482014-04-22 National evaluation of the benefits and risks of greater structuring and coding of the electronic health record: exploratory qualitative investigation Morrison, Zoe Fernando, Bernard Kalra, Dipak Cresswell, Kathrin Sheikh, Aziz J Am Med Inform Assoc Research and Applications OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore stakeholder views, attitudes, needs, and expectations regarding likely benefits and risks resulting from increased structuring and coding of clinical information within electronic health records (EHRs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Qualitative investigation in primary and secondary care and research settings throughout the UK. Data were derived from interviews, expert discussion groups, observations, and relevant documents. Participants (n=70) included patients, healthcare professionals, health service commissioners, policy makers, managers, administrators, systems developers, researchers, and academics. RESULTS: Four main themes arose from our data: variations in documentation practice; patient care benefits; secondary uses of information; and informing and involving patients. We observed a lack of guidelines, co-ordination, and dissemination of best practice relating to the design and use of information structures. While we identified immediate benefits for direct care and secondary analysis, many healthcare professionals did not see the relevance of structured and/or coded data to clinical practice. The potential for structured information to increase patient understanding of their diagnosis and treatment contrasted with concerns regarding the appropriateness of coded information for patients. CONCLUSIONS: The design and development of EHRs requires the capture of narrative information to reflect patient/clinician communication and computable data for administration and research purposes. Increased structuring and/or coding of EHRs therefore offers both benefits and risks. Documentation standards within clinical guidelines are likely to encourage comprehensive, accurate processing of data. As data structures may impact upon clinician/patient interactions, new models of documentation may be necessary if EHRs are to be read and authored by patients. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-05 2013-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3994848/ /pubmed/24186957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001666 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Research and Applications
Morrison, Zoe
Fernando, Bernard
Kalra, Dipak
Cresswell, Kathrin
Sheikh, Aziz
National evaluation of the benefits and risks of greater structuring and coding of the electronic health record: exploratory qualitative investigation
title National evaluation of the benefits and risks of greater structuring and coding of the electronic health record: exploratory qualitative investigation
title_full National evaluation of the benefits and risks of greater structuring and coding of the electronic health record: exploratory qualitative investigation
title_fullStr National evaluation of the benefits and risks of greater structuring and coding of the electronic health record: exploratory qualitative investigation
title_full_unstemmed National evaluation of the benefits and risks of greater structuring and coding of the electronic health record: exploratory qualitative investigation
title_short National evaluation of the benefits and risks of greater structuring and coding of the electronic health record: exploratory qualitative investigation
title_sort national evaluation of the benefits and risks of greater structuring and coding of the electronic health record: exploratory qualitative investigation
topic Research and Applications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3994848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24186957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001666
work_keys_str_mv AT morrisonzoe nationalevaluationofthebenefitsandrisksofgreaterstructuringandcodingoftheelectronichealthrecordexploratoryqualitativeinvestigation
AT fernandobernard nationalevaluationofthebenefitsandrisksofgreaterstructuringandcodingoftheelectronichealthrecordexploratoryqualitativeinvestigation
AT kalradipak nationalevaluationofthebenefitsandrisksofgreaterstructuringandcodingoftheelectronichealthrecordexploratoryqualitativeinvestigation
AT cresswellkathrin nationalevaluationofthebenefitsandrisksofgreaterstructuringandcodingoftheelectronichealthrecordexploratoryqualitativeinvestigation
AT sheikhaziz nationalevaluationofthebenefitsandrisksofgreaterstructuringandcodingoftheelectronichealthrecordexploratoryqualitativeinvestigation