Cargando…

Effect of education and clinical assessment on the accuracy of post partum blood loss estimation

BACKGROUND: This research aimed to assess the effect of health care provider education on the accuracy of post partum blood loss estimation. METHODS: A non-randomized observational study that was conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia between January 1, 2011 and June 30, 2011...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-Kadri, Hanan M, Dahlawi, Hanan, Al Airan, Mona, Elsherif, Elham, Tawfeeq, Nasser, Mokhele, Yane, Brown, Drika, Tamim, Hani M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3994970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24646156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-110
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: This research aimed to assess the effect of health care provider education on the accuracy of post partum blood loss estimation. METHODS: A non-randomized observational study that was conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia between January 1, 2011 and June 30, 2011. Hundred and twenty three health care providers who are involved in the estimation of post partum blood loss were eligible to participate. The participants were subjected to three research phases and an educational intervention. They have assessed a total of 30 different simulated blood loss stations, with 10 stations in each of the research phases. These phases took place before and after educational sessions on how to visually estimate blood loss and how to best utilize patient data in clinical scenarios. We have assessed the differences between the estimated blood loss and the actual measure. P-values were calculated to assess the differences between the three research phases estimations. RESULTS: The participants significantly under-estimated post partum blood loss. The accuracy was improved after training (p-value < 0.0001) and after analysing each patient’s clinical information (p-value = 0.042). The overall results were not affected by the participants’ clinical backgrounds or their years of experience. Under-estimation was more prominent in cases where more than average-excessive blood losses were simulated while over-estimations or accurate estimations were more prominent in less than average blood loss incidents. CONCLUSION: Simple education programmes can improve traditional findings related to under-estimation of blood loss. More sophisticated clinical education programmes may provide additional improvements.