Cargando…

Continued Vigilance – Development of an Online Evaluation Tool for Assessing Preparedness of Medical Facilities for Biological Events

Objective: Effective response to biological events necessitates ongoing evaluation of preparedness. This study was a bilateral German–Israeli collaboration aimed at developing an evaluation tool for assessing preparedness of medical facilities for biological events. Methods: Measurable parameters we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adini, Bruria, Verbeek, Luzie, Trapp, Susanna, Schilling, Stefan, Sasse, Julia, Pientka, Kathrin, Böddinghaus, Boris, Schaefer, Helene, Schempf, Jörg, Brodt, Reinhard, Wegner, Christian, Lev, Boaz, Laor, Daniel, Gottschalk, Rene, Biederbick, Walter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3995059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24783192
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2014.00035
_version_ 1782312817799462912
author Adini, Bruria
Verbeek, Luzie
Trapp, Susanna
Schilling, Stefan
Sasse, Julia
Pientka, Kathrin
Böddinghaus, Boris
Schaefer, Helene
Schempf, Jörg
Brodt, Reinhard
Wegner, Christian
Lev, Boaz
Laor, Daniel
Gottschalk, Rene
Biederbick, Walter
author_facet Adini, Bruria
Verbeek, Luzie
Trapp, Susanna
Schilling, Stefan
Sasse, Julia
Pientka, Kathrin
Böddinghaus, Boris
Schaefer, Helene
Schempf, Jörg
Brodt, Reinhard
Wegner, Christian
Lev, Boaz
Laor, Daniel
Gottschalk, Rene
Biederbick, Walter
author_sort Adini, Bruria
collection PubMed
description Objective: Effective response to biological events necessitates ongoing evaluation of preparedness. This study was a bilateral German–Israeli collaboration aimed at developing an evaluation tool for assessing preparedness of medical facilities for biological events. Methods: Measurable parameters were identified through a literature review for inclusion in the evaluation tool and disseminated to 228 content experts in two modified Delphi cycles. Focus groups were conducted to identify psychosocial needs of the medical teams. Table-top and functional exercises were implemented to review applicability of the tool. Results: One hundred seventeen experts from Germany and Israel participated in the modified Delphi. Out of 188 parameters that were identified, 183 achieved a consensus of >75% of the content experts. Following comments recommended in the Delphi cycles, and feedback from focus groups and hospital exercises, the final tool consisted of 172 parameters. Median level of importance of each parameter was calculated based on ranking recommended in the Delphi process. Computerized web-based software was developed to calculate scores of preparedness for biological events. Conclusion: Ongoing evaluation means, such as the tool developed in the study, can facilitate the need for a valid and reliable mechanism that may be widely adopted and implemented as quality assurance measures. The tool is based on measurable parameters and indicators that can effectively present strengths and weaknesses in managing a response to a public health threat, and accordingly, steps can be implemented to improve readiness. Adoption of such a tool is an important component of assuring public health and effective emergency management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3995059
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39950592014-04-29 Continued Vigilance – Development of an Online Evaluation Tool for Assessing Preparedness of Medical Facilities for Biological Events Adini, Bruria Verbeek, Luzie Trapp, Susanna Schilling, Stefan Sasse, Julia Pientka, Kathrin Böddinghaus, Boris Schaefer, Helene Schempf, Jörg Brodt, Reinhard Wegner, Christian Lev, Boaz Laor, Daniel Gottschalk, Rene Biederbick, Walter Front Public Health Public Health Objective: Effective response to biological events necessitates ongoing evaluation of preparedness. This study was a bilateral German–Israeli collaboration aimed at developing an evaluation tool for assessing preparedness of medical facilities for biological events. Methods: Measurable parameters were identified through a literature review for inclusion in the evaluation tool and disseminated to 228 content experts in two modified Delphi cycles. Focus groups were conducted to identify psychosocial needs of the medical teams. Table-top and functional exercises were implemented to review applicability of the tool. Results: One hundred seventeen experts from Germany and Israel participated in the modified Delphi. Out of 188 parameters that were identified, 183 achieved a consensus of >75% of the content experts. Following comments recommended in the Delphi cycles, and feedback from focus groups and hospital exercises, the final tool consisted of 172 parameters. Median level of importance of each parameter was calculated based on ranking recommended in the Delphi process. Computerized web-based software was developed to calculate scores of preparedness for biological events. Conclusion: Ongoing evaluation means, such as the tool developed in the study, can facilitate the need for a valid and reliable mechanism that may be widely adopted and implemented as quality assurance measures. The tool is based on measurable parameters and indicators that can effectively present strengths and weaknesses in managing a response to a public health threat, and accordingly, steps can be implemented to improve readiness. Adoption of such a tool is an important component of assuring public health and effective emergency management. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3995059/ /pubmed/24783192 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2014.00035 Text en Copyright © 2014 Adini, Verbeek, Trapp, Schilling, Sasse, Pientka, Böddinghaus, Schaefer, Schempf, Brodt, Wegner, Lev, Laor, Gottschalk and Biederbick. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Adini, Bruria
Verbeek, Luzie
Trapp, Susanna
Schilling, Stefan
Sasse, Julia
Pientka, Kathrin
Böddinghaus, Boris
Schaefer, Helene
Schempf, Jörg
Brodt, Reinhard
Wegner, Christian
Lev, Boaz
Laor, Daniel
Gottschalk, Rene
Biederbick, Walter
Continued Vigilance – Development of an Online Evaluation Tool for Assessing Preparedness of Medical Facilities for Biological Events
title Continued Vigilance – Development of an Online Evaluation Tool for Assessing Preparedness of Medical Facilities for Biological Events
title_full Continued Vigilance – Development of an Online Evaluation Tool for Assessing Preparedness of Medical Facilities for Biological Events
title_fullStr Continued Vigilance – Development of an Online Evaluation Tool for Assessing Preparedness of Medical Facilities for Biological Events
title_full_unstemmed Continued Vigilance – Development of an Online Evaluation Tool for Assessing Preparedness of Medical Facilities for Biological Events
title_short Continued Vigilance – Development of an Online Evaluation Tool for Assessing Preparedness of Medical Facilities for Biological Events
title_sort continued vigilance – development of an online evaluation tool for assessing preparedness of medical facilities for biological events
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3995059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24783192
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2014.00035
work_keys_str_mv AT adinibruria continuedvigilancedevelopmentofanonlineevaluationtoolforassessingpreparednessofmedicalfacilitiesforbiologicalevents
AT verbeekluzie continuedvigilancedevelopmentofanonlineevaluationtoolforassessingpreparednessofmedicalfacilitiesforbiologicalevents
AT trappsusanna continuedvigilancedevelopmentofanonlineevaluationtoolforassessingpreparednessofmedicalfacilitiesforbiologicalevents
AT schillingstefan continuedvigilancedevelopmentofanonlineevaluationtoolforassessingpreparednessofmedicalfacilitiesforbiologicalevents
AT sassejulia continuedvigilancedevelopmentofanonlineevaluationtoolforassessingpreparednessofmedicalfacilitiesforbiologicalevents
AT pientkakathrin continuedvigilancedevelopmentofanonlineevaluationtoolforassessingpreparednessofmedicalfacilitiesforbiologicalevents
AT boddinghausboris continuedvigilancedevelopmentofanonlineevaluationtoolforassessingpreparednessofmedicalfacilitiesforbiologicalevents
AT schaeferhelene continuedvigilancedevelopmentofanonlineevaluationtoolforassessingpreparednessofmedicalfacilitiesforbiologicalevents
AT schempfjorg continuedvigilancedevelopmentofanonlineevaluationtoolforassessingpreparednessofmedicalfacilitiesforbiologicalevents
AT brodtreinhard continuedvigilancedevelopmentofanonlineevaluationtoolforassessingpreparednessofmedicalfacilitiesforbiologicalevents
AT wegnerchristian continuedvigilancedevelopmentofanonlineevaluationtoolforassessingpreparednessofmedicalfacilitiesforbiologicalevents
AT levboaz continuedvigilancedevelopmentofanonlineevaluationtoolforassessingpreparednessofmedicalfacilitiesforbiologicalevents
AT laordaniel continuedvigilancedevelopmentofanonlineevaluationtoolforassessingpreparednessofmedicalfacilitiesforbiologicalevents
AT gottschalkrene continuedvigilancedevelopmentofanonlineevaluationtoolforassessingpreparednessofmedicalfacilitiesforbiologicalevents
AT biederbickwalter continuedvigilancedevelopmentofanonlineevaluationtoolforassessingpreparednessofmedicalfacilitiesforbiologicalevents