Cargando…

The influence of computer-assisted surgery on rotational, coronal and sagittal alignment in revision total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: Despite good results of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the number of revision total knee arthroplasties (rTKAs) is rising. Proper implant position is essential, since malposition leads to worse clinical outcome. In rTKA most anatomical landmarks have disappeared because of extens...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meijer, Marrigje F, Stevens, Martin, Boerboom, Alexander L, Bulstra, Sjoerd K, Reininga, Inge HF
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3995112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24646028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-94
_version_ 1782312828767567872
author Meijer, Marrigje F
Stevens, Martin
Boerboom, Alexander L
Bulstra, Sjoerd K
Reininga, Inge HF
author_facet Meijer, Marrigje F
Stevens, Martin
Boerboom, Alexander L
Bulstra, Sjoerd K
Reininga, Inge HF
author_sort Meijer, Marrigje F
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite good results of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the number of revision total knee arthroplasties (rTKAs) is rising. Proper implant position is essential, since malposition leads to worse clinical outcome. In rTKA most anatomical landmarks have disappeared because of extensive bone loss, making it more difficult to adequately implant the knee prosthesis. In primary TKA, computer-assisted surgery (CAS) leads to better prosthetic alignment than mechanical navigation guides. Literature about the use of CAS in rTKA is scarce though, and the effect on rotational prosthetic alignment has not been investigated yet. Hence the primary objective of this study is to compare rotational prosthetic alignment when using CAS in rTKA compared to a mechanical navigation guide. Secondary objectives are to compare prosthetic alignment in the coronal and sagittal planes. It is hypothesized that CAS leads to better rotational, coronal and sagittal prosthetic alignment when used during rTKA. METHODS/DESIGN: A prospective clinical intervention study with use of a historical control group will be conducted. Forty-four patients with a minimum age of 18 to be admitted for CAS-rTKA between September 2012 and September 2015 will be included in the intervention group. Forty-four patients with a minimum age of 18 who underwent rTKA with the use of a mechanical navigation guide between January 2002 and April 2012 will form the historical control group. Both groups will be matched according to gender and type of revision prosthesis. Rotational prosthesis alignment will be evaluated using a CT-scan of the knee joint. DISCUSSION: Proper implant position is essential, since malposition leads to worse clinical outcome. Several studies show a significantly positive influence of CAS on prosthetic alignment in primary TKA, but literature about the use of CAS in rTKA is limited. The purpose of this study is thus to investigate the influence of CAS during rTKA on postoperative prosthetic alignment, compared to mechanical navigation guides. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands National Trial Register NTR3512
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3995112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39951122014-04-23 The influence of computer-assisted surgery on rotational, coronal and sagittal alignment in revision total knee arthroplasty Meijer, Marrigje F Stevens, Martin Boerboom, Alexander L Bulstra, Sjoerd K Reininga, Inge HF BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Despite good results of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the number of revision total knee arthroplasties (rTKAs) is rising. Proper implant position is essential, since malposition leads to worse clinical outcome. In rTKA most anatomical landmarks have disappeared because of extensive bone loss, making it more difficult to adequately implant the knee prosthesis. In primary TKA, computer-assisted surgery (CAS) leads to better prosthetic alignment than mechanical navigation guides. Literature about the use of CAS in rTKA is scarce though, and the effect on rotational prosthetic alignment has not been investigated yet. Hence the primary objective of this study is to compare rotational prosthetic alignment when using CAS in rTKA compared to a mechanical navigation guide. Secondary objectives are to compare prosthetic alignment in the coronal and sagittal planes. It is hypothesized that CAS leads to better rotational, coronal and sagittal prosthetic alignment when used during rTKA. METHODS/DESIGN: A prospective clinical intervention study with use of a historical control group will be conducted. Forty-four patients with a minimum age of 18 to be admitted for CAS-rTKA between September 2012 and September 2015 will be included in the intervention group. Forty-four patients with a minimum age of 18 who underwent rTKA with the use of a mechanical navigation guide between January 2002 and April 2012 will form the historical control group. Both groups will be matched according to gender and type of revision prosthesis. Rotational prosthesis alignment will be evaluated using a CT-scan of the knee joint. DISCUSSION: Proper implant position is essential, since malposition leads to worse clinical outcome. Several studies show a significantly positive influence of CAS on prosthetic alignment in primary TKA, but literature about the use of CAS in rTKA is limited. The purpose of this study is thus to investigate the influence of CAS during rTKA on postoperative prosthetic alignment, compared to mechanical navigation guides. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands National Trial Register NTR3512 BioMed Central 2014-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3995112/ /pubmed/24646028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-94 Text en Copyright © 2014 Meijer et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Meijer, Marrigje F
Stevens, Martin
Boerboom, Alexander L
Bulstra, Sjoerd K
Reininga, Inge HF
The influence of computer-assisted surgery on rotational, coronal and sagittal alignment in revision total knee arthroplasty
title The influence of computer-assisted surgery on rotational, coronal and sagittal alignment in revision total knee arthroplasty
title_full The influence of computer-assisted surgery on rotational, coronal and sagittal alignment in revision total knee arthroplasty
title_fullStr The influence of computer-assisted surgery on rotational, coronal and sagittal alignment in revision total knee arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed The influence of computer-assisted surgery on rotational, coronal and sagittal alignment in revision total knee arthroplasty
title_short The influence of computer-assisted surgery on rotational, coronal and sagittal alignment in revision total knee arthroplasty
title_sort influence of computer-assisted surgery on rotational, coronal and sagittal alignment in revision total knee arthroplasty
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3995112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24646028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-94
work_keys_str_mv AT meijermarrigjef theinfluenceofcomputerassistedsurgeryonrotationalcoronalandsagittalalignmentinrevisiontotalkneearthroplasty
AT stevensmartin theinfluenceofcomputerassistedsurgeryonrotationalcoronalandsagittalalignmentinrevisiontotalkneearthroplasty
AT boerboomalexanderl theinfluenceofcomputerassistedsurgeryonrotationalcoronalandsagittalalignmentinrevisiontotalkneearthroplasty
AT bulstrasjoerdk theinfluenceofcomputerassistedsurgeryonrotationalcoronalandsagittalalignmentinrevisiontotalkneearthroplasty
AT reiningaingehf theinfluenceofcomputerassistedsurgeryonrotationalcoronalandsagittalalignmentinrevisiontotalkneearthroplasty
AT meijermarrigjef influenceofcomputerassistedsurgeryonrotationalcoronalandsagittalalignmentinrevisiontotalkneearthroplasty
AT stevensmartin influenceofcomputerassistedsurgeryonrotationalcoronalandsagittalalignmentinrevisiontotalkneearthroplasty
AT boerboomalexanderl influenceofcomputerassistedsurgeryonrotationalcoronalandsagittalalignmentinrevisiontotalkneearthroplasty
AT bulstrasjoerdk influenceofcomputerassistedsurgeryonrotationalcoronalandsagittalalignmentinrevisiontotalkneearthroplasty
AT reiningaingehf influenceofcomputerassistedsurgeryonrotationalcoronalandsagittalalignmentinrevisiontotalkneearthroplasty