Cargando…

Guidelines to identify abnormalities after childhood urinary tract infections: a prospective audit

OBJECTIVE: To compare the childhood urinary tract infection (UTI) guidelines from the Royal College of Physicians (RCP) in 1991 and from National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (CG54) in 2007 by measuring their efficiency at detecting urinary tract abnormalities. DESIGN: Children wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coulthard, Malcolm G, Lambert, Heather J, Vernon, Susan J, Hunter, Elizabeth W, Keir, Michael J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3995217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24436366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2013-304429
_version_ 1782312841025421312
author Coulthard, Malcolm G
Lambert, Heather J
Vernon, Susan J
Hunter, Elizabeth W
Keir, Michael J
author_facet Coulthard, Malcolm G
Lambert, Heather J
Vernon, Susan J
Hunter, Elizabeth W
Keir, Michael J
author_sort Coulthard, Malcolm G
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the childhood urinary tract infection (UTI) guidelines from the Royal College of Physicians (RCP) in 1991 and from National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (CG54) in 2007 by measuring their efficiency at detecting urinary tract abnormalities. DESIGN: Children with UTIs within the Newcastle Primary Care Trust (population 70 800 children) were referred and imaged according to the RCP guidelines during 2008, and these were compared to the activity that would have been undertaken if we had implemented the CG54 guidelines, including following them through 2011 to identify those with recurrent UTIs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The numbers of children imaged, the imaging burden and efficiency, and urinary tract abnormalities detected by each guideline. RESULTS: Fewer children would have been imaged by CG54 than RCP (150 vs 427), but its sensitivity was lower, at 44% for detecting scarring, 10% for identifying vesicoureteric reflux and 40% for other abnormalities. Overall, it would have only detected one-quarter of the abnormal cases (8 vs 32) and would have missed five of nine children with scarring, including three with multiple lesions and one with renal impairment. Imposing an age restriction of <8 years to the RCP guidelines would reduce its screening rate by 20% and still detect 90% of the abnormalities. INTERPRETATION: The CG54 guidelines do not alter the imaging efficiency compared to the RCP guidelines, but they are considerably less sensitive.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3995217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39952172014-04-25 Guidelines to identify abnormalities after childhood urinary tract infections: a prospective audit Coulthard, Malcolm G Lambert, Heather J Vernon, Susan J Hunter, Elizabeth W Keir, Michael J Arch Dis Child Original Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the childhood urinary tract infection (UTI) guidelines from the Royal College of Physicians (RCP) in 1991 and from National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (CG54) in 2007 by measuring their efficiency at detecting urinary tract abnormalities. DESIGN: Children with UTIs within the Newcastle Primary Care Trust (population 70 800 children) were referred and imaged according to the RCP guidelines during 2008, and these were compared to the activity that would have been undertaken if we had implemented the CG54 guidelines, including following them through 2011 to identify those with recurrent UTIs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The numbers of children imaged, the imaging burden and efficiency, and urinary tract abnormalities detected by each guideline. RESULTS: Fewer children would have been imaged by CG54 than RCP (150 vs 427), but its sensitivity was lower, at 44% for detecting scarring, 10% for identifying vesicoureteric reflux and 40% for other abnormalities. Overall, it would have only detected one-quarter of the abnormal cases (8 vs 32) and would have missed five of nine children with scarring, including three with multiple lesions and one with renal impairment. Imposing an age restriction of <8 years to the RCP guidelines would reduce its screening rate by 20% and still detect 90% of the abnormalities. INTERPRETATION: The CG54 guidelines do not alter the imaging efficiency compared to the RCP guidelines, but they are considerably less sensitive. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-05 2014-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3995217/ /pubmed/24436366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2013-304429 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Coulthard, Malcolm G
Lambert, Heather J
Vernon, Susan J
Hunter, Elizabeth W
Keir, Michael J
Guidelines to identify abnormalities after childhood urinary tract infections: a prospective audit
title Guidelines to identify abnormalities after childhood urinary tract infections: a prospective audit
title_full Guidelines to identify abnormalities after childhood urinary tract infections: a prospective audit
title_fullStr Guidelines to identify abnormalities after childhood urinary tract infections: a prospective audit
title_full_unstemmed Guidelines to identify abnormalities after childhood urinary tract infections: a prospective audit
title_short Guidelines to identify abnormalities after childhood urinary tract infections: a prospective audit
title_sort guidelines to identify abnormalities after childhood urinary tract infections: a prospective audit
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3995217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24436366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2013-304429
work_keys_str_mv AT coulthardmalcolmg guidelinestoidentifyabnormalitiesafterchildhoodurinarytractinfectionsaprospectiveaudit
AT lambertheatherj guidelinestoidentifyabnormalitiesafterchildhoodurinarytractinfectionsaprospectiveaudit
AT vernonsusanj guidelinestoidentifyabnormalitiesafterchildhoodurinarytractinfectionsaprospectiveaudit
AT hunterelizabethw guidelinestoidentifyabnormalitiesafterchildhoodurinarytractinfectionsaprospectiveaudit
AT keirmichaelj guidelinestoidentifyabnormalitiesafterchildhoodurinarytractinfectionsaprospectiveaudit