Cargando…

Low-dose laser acupuncture for non-specific chronic low back pain: a double-blind randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To determine if infrared laser acupuncture (LA) may have a specific effect in reducing pain and disability in treatment of chronic low back pain (LBP). METHODS: This was a double-blind sham laser controlled trial performed in general practices in Perth, Western Australia. The participants...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Glazov, Gregory, Yelland, Michael, Emery, Jon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3995277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24280948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/acupmed-2013-010456
_version_ 1782312854468165632
author Glazov, Gregory
Yelland, Michael
Emery, Jon
author_facet Glazov, Gregory
Yelland, Michael
Emery, Jon
author_sort Glazov, Gregory
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine if infrared laser acupuncture (LA) may have a specific effect in reducing pain and disability in treatment of chronic low back pain (LBP). METHODS: This was a double-blind sham laser controlled trial performed in general practices in Perth, Western Australia. The participants were 144 adults with chronic non-specific LBP. They were randomised to receive eight once-weekly treatments. Laser machines (20 mW, 840 nm diode, power density 0.1 W/cm(2)) stimulated points in three treatment groups: sham (0 joules/point), low dose (0.2 J/point) and high dose (0.8 joules/point). Participants were followed-up at 1 and 6 weeks, and 6 and 12 months post treatment. Primary outcomes were pain (Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)) and disability (Oswestry Disability Inventory (ODI)) at 6 weeks post treatment. Secondary outcomes included numerical rating scale for limitation of activity, global assessment of improvement, analgesic usage and adverse effects after treatment. RESULTS: The analysis showed no difference between sham and the laser groups at 6 weeks for pain or disability. There was a significant reduction in mean pain and disability in all groups at 6 weeks (p<0.005); NPRS: sham (−1.5 (95% CI −2.1 to −0.8)), low dose (−1.3 (−2.0 to −0.8)), high dose (−1.1 (−1.7 to −0.5)). ODI: sham (−4.0 (−7.1 to −1.0)), low dose (−4.1, (−6.7 to −1.5)), high dose (−2.6 (−5.7 to 0.5)). All secondary outcomes also showed clinical improvement over time but with no differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: LA using energy density range (0–4 J/cm(2)) for the treatment of chronic non-specific LBP resulted in clinical improvement unrelated to laser stimulation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.anzctr.org.au ACTRN12610000043033.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3995277
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39952772014-04-25 Low-dose laser acupuncture for non-specific chronic low back pain: a double-blind randomised controlled trial Glazov, Gregory Yelland, Michael Emery, Jon Acupunct Med Original Paper OBJECTIVE: To determine if infrared laser acupuncture (LA) may have a specific effect in reducing pain and disability in treatment of chronic low back pain (LBP). METHODS: This was a double-blind sham laser controlled trial performed in general practices in Perth, Western Australia. The participants were 144 adults with chronic non-specific LBP. They were randomised to receive eight once-weekly treatments. Laser machines (20 mW, 840 nm diode, power density 0.1 W/cm(2)) stimulated points in three treatment groups: sham (0 joules/point), low dose (0.2 J/point) and high dose (0.8 joules/point). Participants were followed-up at 1 and 6 weeks, and 6 and 12 months post treatment. Primary outcomes were pain (Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)) and disability (Oswestry Disability Inventory (ODI)) at 6 weeks post treatment. Secondary outcomes included numerical rating scale for limitation of activity, global assessment of improvement, analgesic usage and adverse effects after treatment. RESULTS: The analysis showed no difference between sham and the laser groups at 6 weeks for pain or disability. There was a significant reduction in mean pain and disability in all groups at 6 weeks (p<0.005); NPRS: sham (−1.5 (95% CI −2.1 to −0.8)), low dose (−1.3 (−2.0 to −0.8)), high dose (−1.1 (−1.7 to −0.5)). ODI: sham (−4.0 (−7.1 to −1.0)), low dose (−4.1, (−6.7 to −1.5)), high dose (−2.6 (−5.7 to 0.5)). All secondary outcomes also showed clinical improvement over time but with no differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: LA using energy density range (0–4 J/cm(2)) for the treatment of chronic non-specific LBP resulted in clinical improvement unrelated to laser stimulation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.anzctr.org.au ACTRN12610000043033. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-04 2013-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3995277/ /pubmed/24280948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/acupmed-2013-010456 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Original Paper
Glazov, Gregory
Yelland, Michael
Emery, Jon
Low-dose laser acupuncture for non-specific chronic low back pain: a double-blind randomised controlled trial
title Low-dose laser acupuncture for non-specific chronic low back pain: a double-blind randomised controlled trial
title_full Low-dose laser acupuncture for non-specific chronic low back pain: a double-blind randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Low-dose laser acupuncture for non-specific chronic low back pain: a double-blind randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Low-dose laser acupuncture for non-specific chronic low back pain: a double-blind randomised controlled trial
title_short Low-dose laser acupuncture for non-specific chronic low back pain: a double-blind randomised controlled trial
title_sort low-dose laser acupuncture for non-specific chronic low back pain: a double-blind randomised controlled trial
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3995277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24280948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/acupmed-2013-010456
work_keys_str_mv AT glazovgregory lowdoselaseracupuncturefornonspecificchroniclowbackpainadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT yellandmichael lowdoselaseracupuncturefornonspecificchroniclowbackpainadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT emeryjon lowdoselaseracupuncturefornonspecificchroniclowbackpainadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial