Cargando…

Histopathological features of bone regeneration in a canine segmental ulnar defect model

BACKGROUND: Today, finding an ideal biomaterial to treat the large bone defects, delayed unions and non-unions remains a challenge for orthopaedic surgeions and researchers. Several studies have been carried out on the subject of bone regeneration, each having its own advantages. The present study h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hobbenaghi, Rahim, Mahboob, Pariya, Saifzadeh, Siamak, Javanbakht, Javad, Manesh, Javad Yaghoobi Yeganeh, Mortezaee, Rasool, Touni, Seyed Rashid, Hosseini, Ehsan, Aghajanshakeri, Shahin, Moloudizargari, Milad, Javaherypour, Soheil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3995496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24636669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-1596-9-59
_version_ 1782312878210023424
author Hobbenaghi, Rahim
Mahboob, Pariya
Saifzadeh, Siamak
Javanbakht, Javad
Manesh, Javad Yaghoobi Yeganeh
Mortezaee, Rasool
Touni, Seyed Rashid
Hosseini, Ehsan
Aghajanshakeri, Shahin
Moloudizargari, Milad
Javaherypour, Soheil
author_facet Hobbenaghi, Rahim
Mahboob, Pariya
Saifzadeh, Siamak
Javanbakht, Javad
Manesh, Javad Yaghoobi Yeganeh
Mortezaee, Rasool
Touni, Seyed Rashid
Hosseini, Ehsan
Aghajanshakeri, Shahin
Moloudizargari, Milad
Javaherypour, Soheil
author_sort Hobbenaghi, Rahim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Today, finding an ideal biomaterial to treat the large bone defects, delayed unions and non-unions remains a challenge for orthopaedic surgeions and researchers. Several studies have been carried out on the subject of bone regeneration, each having its own advantages. The present study has been designed in vivo to evaluate the effects of cellular auto-transplantation of tail vertebrae on healing of experimental critical bone defect in a dog model. METHODS: Six indigenous breeds of dog with 32 ± 3.6 kg average weight from both sexes (5 males and 1 female) received bilateral critical-sized ulnar segmental defects. After determining the health condition, divided to 2 groups: The Group I were kept as control I (n = 1) while in Group II (experimental group; n = 5) bioactive bone implants were inserted. The defects were implanted with either autogeneic coccygeal bone grafts in dogs with 3-4 cm diaphyseal defects in the ulna. Defects were stabilized with internal plate fixation, and the control defects were not stabilized. Animals were euthanized at 16 weeks and analyzed by histopathology. RESULTS: Histological evaluation of this new bone at sixteen weeks postoperatively revealed primarily lamellar bone, with the formation of new cortices and normal-appearing marrow elements. And also reformation cortical compartment and reconstitution of marrow space were observed at the graft-host interface together with graft resorption and necrosis responses. Finally, our data were consistent with the osteoconducting function of the tail autograft. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested that the tail vertebrae autograft seemed to be a new source of autogenous cortical bone in order to supporting segmental long bone defects in dogs. Furthermore, cellular autotransplantation was found to be a successful replacement for the tail vertebrae allograft bone at 3-4 cm segmental defects in the canine mid- ulna. Clinical application using graft expanders or bone autotransplantation should be used carefully and requires further investigation. VIRTUAL SLIDES: The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/2028232688119271.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3995496
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39954962014-04-23 Histopathological features of bone regeneration in a canine segmental ulnar defect model Hobbenaghi, Rahim Mahboob, Pariya Saifzadeh, Siamak Javanbakht, Javad Manesh, Javad Yaghoobi Yeganeh Mortezaee, Rasool Touni, Seyed Rashid Hosseini, Ehsan Aghajanshakeri, Shahin Moloudizargari, Milad Javaherypour, Soheil Diagn Pathol Research BACKGROUND: Today, finding an ideal biomaterial to treat the large bone defects, delayed unions and non-unions remains a challenge for orthopaedic surgeions and researchers. Several studies have been carried out on the subject of bone regeneration, each having its own advantages. The present study has been designed in vivo to evaluate the effects of cellular auto-transplantation of tail vertebrae on healing of experimental critical bone defect in a dog model. METHODS: Six indigenous breeds of dog with 32 ± 3.6 kg average weight from both sexes (5 males and 1 female) received bilateral critical-sized ulnar segmental defects. After determining the health condition, divided to 2 groups: The Group I were kept as control I (n = 1) while in Group II (experimental group; n = 5) bioactive bone implants were inserted. The defects were implanted with either autogeneic coccygeal bone grafts in dogs with 3-4 cm diaphyseal defects in the ulna. Defects were stabilized with internal plate fixation, and the control defects were not stabilized. Animals were euthanized at 16 weeks and analyzed by histopathology. RESULTS: Histological evaluation of this new bone at sixteen weeks postoperatively revealed primarily lamellar bone, with the formation of new cortices and normal-appearing marrow elements. And also reformation cortical compartment and reconstitution of marrow space were observed at the graft-host interface together with graft resorption and necrosis responses. Finally, our data were consistent with the osteoconducting function of the tail autograft. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested that the tail vertebrae autograft seemed to be a new source of autogenous cortical bone in order to supporting segmental long bone defects in dogs. Furthermore, cellular autotransplantation was found to be a successful replacement for the tail vertebrae allograft bone at 3-4 cm segmental defects in the canine mid- ulna. Clinical application using graft expanders or bone autotransplantation should be used carefully and requires further investigation. VIRTUAL SLIDES: The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/2028232688119271. BioMed Central 2014-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3995496/ /pubmed/24636669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-1596-9-59 Text en Copyright © 2014 Hobbenaghi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Hobbenaghi, Rahim
Mahboob, Pariya
Saifzadeh, Siamak
Javanbakht, Javad
Manesh, Javad Yaghoobi Yeganeh
Mortezaee, Rasool
Touni, Seyed Rashid
Hosseini, Ehsan
Aghajanshakeri, Shahin
Moloudizargari, Milad
Javaherypour, Soheil
Histopathological features of bone regeneration in a canine segmental ulnar defect model
title Histopathological features of bone regeneration in a canine segmental ulnar defect model
title_full Histopathological features of bone regeneration in a canine segmental ulnar defect model
title_fullStr Histopathological features of bone regeneration in a canine segmental ulnar defect model
title_full_unstemmed Histopathological features of bone regeneration in a canine segmental ulnar defect model
title_short Histopathological features of bone regeneration in a canine segmental ulnar defect model
title_sort histopathological features of bone regeneration in a canine segmental ulnar defect model
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3995496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24636669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-1596-9-59
work_keys_str_mv AT hobbenaghirahim histopathologicalfeaturesofboneregenerationinacaninesegmentalulnardefectmodel
AT mahboobpariya histopathologicalfeaturesofboneregenerationinacaninesegmentalulnardefectmodel
AT saifzadehsiamak histopathologicalfeaturesofboneregenerationinacaninesegmentalulnardefectmodel
AT javanbakhtjavad histopathologicalfeaturesofboneregenerationinacaninesegmentalulnardefectmodel
AT maneshjavadyaghoobiyeganeh histopathologicalfeaturesofboneregenerationinacaninesegmentalulnardefectmodel
AT mortezaeerasool histopathologicalfeaturesofboneregenerationinacaninesegmentalulnardefectmodel
AT touniseyedrashid histopathologicalfeaturesofboneregenerationinacaninesegmentalulnardefectmodel
AT hosseiniehsan histopathologicalfeaturesofboneregenerationinacaninesegmentalulnardefectmodel
AT aghajanshakerishahin histopathologicalfeaturesofboneregenerationinacaninesegmentalulnardefectmodel
AT moloudizargarimilad histopathologicalfeaturesofboneregenerationinacaninesegmentalulnardefectmodel
AT javaherypoursoheil histopathologicalfeaturesofboneregenerationinacaninesegmentalulnardefectmodel