Cargando…

Computed tomography measurement of glenoid vault version as an alternative measuring method for glenoid version

BACKGROUND: The conventional measuring method for glenoid version is greatly influenced by the scapular body shape that varies widely between patients. We postulated that the glenoid vault version could be more useful than the conventional glenoid version in clinical cases. OBJECTIVES: The purposes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matsumura, Noboru, Ogawa, Kiyohisa, Ikegami, Hiroyasu, Collin, Philippe, Walch, Gilles, Toyama, Yoshiaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3995775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24618285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-9-17
_version_ 1782312933961760768
author Matsumura, Noboru
Ogawa, Kiyohisa
Ikegami, Hiroyasu
Collin, Philippe
Walch, Gilles
Toyama, Yoshiaki
author_facet Matsumura, Noboru
Ogawa, Kiyohisa
Ikegami, Hiroyasu
Collin, Philippe
Walch, Gilles
Toyama, Yoshiaki
author_sort Matsumura, Noboru
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The conventional measuring method for glenoid version is greatly influenced by the scapular body shape that varies widely between patients. We postulated that the glenoid vault version could be more useful than the conventional glenoid version in clinical cases. OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this study were to compare the values of glenoid version measured with the conventional method to those with the vault method and to investigate the feasibility of the glenoid vault version. METHODS: Computed tomography scans of 150 normal shoulders and 150 arthritic shoulders were analyzed. Three-dimensionally corrected slices were reconstructed from the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) data, and glenoid version was measured with both the conventional and vault methods. After determining intra- and interrater reliabilities, differences in glenoid version values between the conventional and vault methods were assessed. In the normal shoulder group, side-to-side differences of glenoid version values were also evaluated in both methods. RESULTS: Both measuring methods demonstrated high intra- and interrater reliabilities. The normal glenoid had 1.1° ± 3.2° retroversion with the conventional method and 8.9° ± 2.7° retroversion with the vault method. The average glenoid retroversion of arthritic shoulders was 10.8° ± 9.3° measured with the conventional method and 18.2° ± 9.1° with the vault method. The vault method showed significantly larger glenoid retroversion than the conventional method in both normal and arthritic shoulder groups. Both conventional glenoid retroversion and glenoid vault retroversion were significantly larger on dominant sides than on nondominant sides in the normal shoulders. CONCLUSIONS: The glenoid vault version could be used as an alternative measuring method for glenoid version with high reliability. In clinical use, the glenoid vault version appears to be more useful than the conventional glenoid version to assess the severity of arthritis and difficulty of glenoid replacement. The glenoid vault is not symmetric, but usually retroverted in both normal and arthritic shoulders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3995775
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39957752014-04-23 Computed tomography measurement of glenoid vault version as an alternative measuring method for glenoid version Matsumura, Noboru Ogawa, Kiyohisa Ikegami, Hiroyasu Collin, Philippe Walch, Gilles Toyama, Yoshiaki J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The conventional measuring method for glenoid version is greatly influenced by the scapular body shape that varies widely between patients. We postulated that the glenoid vault version could be more useful than the conventional glenoid version in clinical cases. OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this study were to compare the values of glenoid version measured with the conventional method to those with the vault method and to investigate the feasibility of the glenoid vault version. METHODS: Computed tomography scans of 150 normal shoulders and 150 arthritic shoulders were analyzed. Three-dimensionally corrected slices were reconstructed from the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) data, and glenoid version was measured with both the conventional and vault methods. After determining intra- and interrater reliabilities, differences in glenoid version values between the conventional and vault methods were assessed. In the normal shoulder group, side-to-side differences of glenoid version values were also evaluated in both methods. RESULTS: Both measuring methods demonstrated high intra- and interrater reliabilities. The normal glenoid had 1.1° ± 3.2° retroversion with the conventional method and 8.9° ± 2.7° retroversion with the vault method. The average glenoid retroversion of arthritic shoulders was 10.8° ± 9.3° measured with the conventional method and 18.2° ± 9.1° with the vault method. The vault method showed significantly larger glenoid retroversion than the conventional method in both normal and arthritic shoulder groups. Both conventional glenoid retroversion and glenoid vault retroversion were significantly larger on dominant sides than on nondominant sides in the normal shoulders. CONCLUSIONS: The glenoid vault version could be used as an alternative measuring method for glenoid version with high reliability. In clinical use, the glenoid vault version appears to be more useful than the conventional glenoid version to assess the severity of arthritis and difficulty of glenoid replacement. The glenoid vault is not symmetric, but usually retroverted in both normal and arthritic shoulders. BioMed Central 2014-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3995775/ /pubmed/24618285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-9-17 Text en Copyright © 2014 Matsumura et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Matsumura, Noboru
Ogawa, Kiyohisa
Ikegami, Hiroyasu
Collin, Philippe
Walch, Gilles
Toyama, Yoshiaki
Computed tomography measurement of glenoid vault version as an alternative measuring method for glenoid version
title Computed tomography measurement of glenoid vault version as an alternative measuring method for glenoid version
title_full Computed tomography measurement of glenoid vault version as an alternative measuring method for glenoid version
title_fullStr Computed tomography measurement of glenoid vault version as an alternative measuring method for glenoid version
title_full_unstemmed Computed tomography measurement of glenoid vault version as an alternative measuring method for glenoid version
title_short Computed tomography measurement of glenoid vault version as an alternative measuring method for glenoid version
title_sort computed tomography measurement of glenoid vault version as an alternative measuring method for glenoid version
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3995775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24618285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-9-17
work_keys_str_mv AT matsumuranoboru computedtomographymeasurementofglenoidvaultversionasanalternativemeasuringmethodforglenoidversion
AT ogawakiyohisa computedtomographymeasurementofglenoidvaultversionasanalternativemeasuringmethodforglenoidversion
AT ikegamihiroyasu computedtomographymeasurementofglenoidvaultversionasanalternativemeasuringmethodforglenoidversion
AT collinphilippe computedtomographymeasurementofglenoidvaultversionasanalternativemeasuringmethodforglenoidversion
AT walchgilles computedtomographymeasurementofglenoidvaultversionasanalternativemeasuringmethodforglenoidversion
AT toyamayoshiaki computedtomographymeasurementofglenoidvaultversionasanalternativemeasuringmethodforglenoidversion