Cargando…
Intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: guidance for treatment planning
BACKGROUND: Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) is a common tool used to treat Arteriovenous Malformations (AVMs) in anatomical locations associated with a risk of surgical complications. Despite high rates of clinical effectiveness, SRS carries a risk of toxicity as a result of radiation injury to brai...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3995862/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24612667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-73 |
_version_ | 1782312944506241024 |
---|---|
author | Sonier, Marcus Gete, Ermias Herbert, Chris McKenzie, Michael Murphy, James Moiseenko, Vitali |
author_facet | Sonier, Marcus Gete, Ermias Herbert, Chris McKenzie, Michael Murphy, James Moiseenko, Vitali |
author_sort | Sonier, Marcus |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) is a common tool used to treat Arteriovenous Malformations (AVMs) in anatomical locations associated with a risk of surgical complications. Despite high rates of clinical effectiveness, SRS carries a risk of toxicity as a result of radiation injury to brain tissue. The use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has increased because it may lead to improved PTV conformity and better Normal Tissue (NT) sparing compared to 3D Conformal Radiotherapy (3DCRT). The aim of this study was twofold: 1) to develop simple patient stratification rules for the recommendation of IMRT planning strategies over 3DCRT in the treatment of AVMs with SRS; and 2) to estimate the impact of IMRT in terms of toxicity reduction using retrospectively reported data for symptomatic radiation injury following SRS. METHODS: Thirty-one AVM patients previously treated with 3DCRT were replanned in a commercial treatment planning system using 3DCRT and static gantry IMRT with identical beam arrangements. The radiotherapy planning metrics analyzed included AVM volume, diameter, and volume to surface area ratio. The dosimetric endpoints analyzed included conformity index improvements and NT sparing measured by the maximum NT dose, and the volume of surrounding tissue that received 7Gy and 12Gy. RESULTS: Our analysis revealed stratified subsets of patients for IMRT that were associated with improved conformity, and those that were associated with decreased doses to normal tissue. The stratified patients experienced an improvement in conformity index by −6-68%, a reduction in the maximum NT dose by −0.5-12.3%, a reduction in the volume of NT receiving 7Gy by 1-8 cc, and a reduction in the volume of NT receiving 12Gy by 0–3.7 cc. The reduction in NT receiving 12Gy translated to a theoretical decrease in the probability of symptomatic injury by 0–9.3%. CONCLUSIONS: This work indicates the potential for significant patient improvements when treating AVMs and provides rules to predict which patients are likely to benefit from IMRT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3995862 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39958622014-04-23 Intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: guidance for treatment planning Sonier, Marcus Gete, Ermias Herbert, Chris McKenzie, Michael Murphy, James Moiseenko, Vitali Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) is a common tool used to treat Arteriovenous Malformations (AVMs) in anatomical locations associated with a risk of surgical complications. Despite high rates of clinical effectiveness, SRS carries a risk of toxicity as a result of radiation injury to brain tissue. The use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has increased because it may lead to improved PTV conformity and better Normal Tissue (NT) sparing compared to 3D Conformal Radiotherapy (3DCRT). The aim of this study was twofold: 1) to develop simple patient stratification rules for the recommendation of IMRT planning strategies over 3DCRT in the treatment of AVMs with SRS; and 2) to estimate the impact of IMRT in terms of toxicity reduction using retrospectively reported data for symptomatic radiation injury following SRS. METHODS: Thirty-one AVM patients previously treated with 3DCRT were replanned in a commercial treatment planning system using 3DCRT and static gantry IMRT with identical beam arrangements. The radiotherapy planning metrics analyzed included AVM volume, diameter, and volume to surface area ratio. The dosimetric endpoints analyzed included conformity index improvements and NT sparing measured by the maximum NT dose, and the volume of surrounding tissue that received 7Gy and 12Gy. RESULTS: Our analysis revealed stratified subsets of patients for IMRT that were associated with improved conformity, and those that were associated with decreased doses to normal tissue. The stratified patients experienced an improvement in conformity index by −6-68%, a reduction in the maximum NT dose by −0.5-12.3%, a reduction in the volume of NT receiving 7Gy by 1-8 cc, and a reduction in the volume of NT receiving 12Gy by 0–3.7 cc. The reduction in NT receiving 12Gy translated to a theoretical decrease in the probability of symptomatic injury by 0–9.3%. CONCLUSIONS: This work indicates the potential for significant patient improvements when treating AVMs and provides rules to predict which patients are likely to benefit from IMRT. BioMed Central 2014-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3995862/ /pubmed/24612667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-73 Text en Copyright © 2014 Sonier et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Sonier, Marcus Gete, Ermias Herbert, Chris McKenzie, Michael Murphy, James Moiseenko, Vitali Intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: guidance for treatment planning |
title | Intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: guidance for treatment planning |
title_full | Intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: guidance for treatment planning |
title_fullStr | Intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: guidance for treatment planning |
title_full_unstemmed | Intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: guidance for treatment planning |
title_short | Intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: guidance for treatment planning |
title_sort | intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: guidance for treatment planning |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3995862/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24612667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-73 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT soniermarcus intensitymodulatedstereotacticradiosurgeryforarteriovenousmalformationsguidancefortreatmentplanning AT geteermias intensitymodulatedstereotacticradiosurgeryforarteriovenousmalformationsguidancefortreatmentplanning AT herbertchris intensitymodulatedstereotacticradiosurgeryforarteriovenousmalformationsguidancefortreatmentplanning AT mckenziemichael intensitymodulatedstereotacticradiosurgeryforarteriovenousmalformationsguidancefortreatmentplanning AT murphyjames intensitymodulatedstereotacticradiosurgeryforarteriovenousmalformationsguidancefortreatmentplanning AT moiseenkovitali intensitymodulatedstereotacticradiosurgeryforarteriovenousmalformationsguidancefortreatmentplanning |