Cargando…

Intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: guidance for treatment planning

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) is a common tool used to treat Arteriovenous Malformations (AVMs) in anatomical locations associated with a risk of surgical complications. Despite high rates of clinical effectiveness, SRS carries a risk of toxicity as a result of radiation injury to brai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sonier, Marcus, Gete, Ermias, Herbert, Chris, McKenzie, Michael, Murphy, James, Moiseenko, Vitali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3995862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24612667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-73
_version_ 1782312944506241024
author Sonier, Marcus
Gete, Ermias
Herbert, Chris
McKenzie, Michael
Murphy, James
Moiseenko, Vitali
author_facet Sonier, Marcus
Gete, Ermias
Herbert, Chris
McKenzie, Michael
Murphy, James
Moiseenko, Vitali
author_sort Sonier, Marcus
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) is a common tool used to treat Arteriovenous Malformations (AVMs) in anatomical locations associated with a risk of surgical complications. Despite high rates of clinical effectiveness, SRS carries a risk of toxicity as a result of radiation injury to brain tissue. The use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has increased because it may lead to improved PTV conformity and better Normal Tissue (NT) sparing compared to 3D Conformal Radiotherapy (3DCRT). The aim of this study was twofold: 1) to develop simple patient stratification rules for the recommendation of IMRT planning strategies over 3DCRT in the treatment of AVMs with SRS; and 2) to estimate the impact of IMRT in terms of toxicity reduction using retrospectively reported data for symptomatic radiation injury following SRS. METHODS: Thirty-one AVM patients previously treated with 3DCRT were replanned in a commercial treatment planning system using 3DCRT and static gantry IMRT with identical beam arrangements. The radiotherapy planning metrics analyzed included AVM volume, diameter, and volume to surface area ratio. The dosimetric endpoints analyzed included conformity index improvements and NT sparing measured by the maximum NT dose, and the volume of surrounding tissue that received 7Gy and 12Gy. RESULTS: Our analysis revealed stratified subsets of patients for IMRT that were associated with improved conformity, and those that were associated with decreased doses to normal tissue. The stratified patients experienced an improvement in conformity index by −6-68%, a reduction in the maximum NT dose by −0.5-12.3%, a reduction in the volume of NT receiving 7Gy by 1-8 cc, and a reduction in the volume of NT receiving 12Gy by 0–3.7 cc. The reduction in NT receiving 12Gy translated to a theoretical decrease in the probability of symptomatic injury by 0–9.3%. CONCLUSIONS: This work indicates the potential for significant patient improvements when treating AVMs and provides rules to predict which patients are likely to benefit from IMRT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3995862
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39958622014-04-23 Intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: guidance for treatment planning Sonier, Marcus Gete, Ermias Herbert, Chris McKenzie, Michael Murphy, James Moiseenko, Vitali Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) is a common tool used to treat Arteriovenous Malformations (AVMs) in anatomical locations associated with a risk of surgical complications. Despite high rates of clinical effectiveness, SRS carries a risk of toxicity as a result of radiation injury to brain tissue. The use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has increased because it may lead to improved PTV conformity and better Normal Tissue (NT) sparing compared to 3D Conformal Radiotherapy (3DCRT). The aim of this study was twofold: 1) to develop simple patient stratification rules for the recommendation of IMRT planning strategies over 3DCRT in the treatment of AVMs with SRS; and 2) to estimate the impact of IMRT in terms of toxicity reduction using retrospectively reported data for symptomatic radiation injury following SRS. METHODS: Thirty-one AVM patients previously treated with 3DCRT were replanned in a commercial treatment planning system using 3DCRT and static gantry IMRT with identical beam arrangements. The radiotherapy planning metrics analyzed included AVM volume, diameter, and volume to surface area ratio. The dosimetric endpoints analyzed included conformity index improvements and NT sparing measured by the maximum NT dose, and the volume of surrounding tissue that received 7Gy and 12Gy. RESULTS: Our analysis revealed stratified subsets of patients for IMRT that were associated with improved conformity, and those that were associated with decreased doses to normal tissue. The stratified patients experienced an improvement in conformity index by −6-68%, a reduction in the maximum NT dose by −0.5-12.3%, a reduction in the volume of NT receiving 7Gy by 1-8 cc, and a reduction in the volume of NT receiving 12Gy by 0–3.7 cc. The reduction in NT receiving 12Gy translated to a theoretical decrease in the probability of symptomatic injury by 0–9.3%. CONCLUSIONS: This work indicates the potential for significant patient improvements when treating AVMs and provides rules to predict which patients are likely to benefit from IMRT. BioMed Central 2014-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3995862/ /pubmed/24612667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-73 Text en Copyright © 2014 Sonier et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research
Sonier, Marcus
Gete, Ermias
Herbert, Chris
McKenzie, Michael
Murphy, James
Moiseenko, Vitali
Intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: guidance for treatment planning
title Intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: guidance for treatment planning
title_full Intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: guidance for treatment planning
title_fullStr Intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: guidance for treatment planning
title_full_unstemmed Intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: guidance for treatment planning
title_short Intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: guidance for treatment planning
title_sort intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: guidance for treatment planning
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3995862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24612667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-73
work_keys_str_mv AT soniermarcus intensitymodulatedstereotacticradiosurgeryforarteriovenousmalformationsguidancefortreatmentplanning
AT geteermias intensitymodulatedstereotacticradiosurgeryforarteriovenousmalformationsguidancefortreatmentplanning
AT herbertchris intensitymodulatedstereotacticradiosurgeryforarteriovenousmalformationsguidancefortreatmentplanning
AT mckenziemichael intensitymodulatedstereotacticradiosurgeryforarteriovenousmalformationsguidancefortreatmentplanning
AT murphyjames intensitymodulatedstereotacticradiosurgeryforarteriovenousmalformationsguidancefortreatmentplanning
AT moiseenkovitali intensitymodulatedstereotacticradiosurgeryforarteriovenousmalformationsguidancefortreatmentplanning