Cargando…

Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Randomized, Controlled, Biomarker Study

BACKGROUND: Endothelial progenitor cells (CEPs) and circulating endothelial cells (CECs) are potential biomarkers of response to anti-angiogenic treatment regimens. In the current study, we investigated the effect of docetaxel and sunitinib on CEP/CEC kinetics and clinical response in castration res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fuereder, Thorsten, Wacheck, Volker, Strommer, Sabine, Horak, Peter, Gerschpacher, Marion, Lamm, Wolfgang, Kivaranovic, Danijel, Krainer, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3995874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24755958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095310
_version_ 1782312945649188864
author Fuereder, Thorsten
Wacheck, Volker
Strommer, Sabine
Horak, Peter
Gerschpacher, Marion
Lamm, Wolfgang
Kivaranovic, Danijel
Krainer, Michael
author_facet Fuereder, Thorsten
Wacheck, Volker
Strommer, Sabine
Horak, Peter
Gerschpacher, Marion
Lamm, Wolfgang
Kivaranovic, Danijel
Krainer, Michael
author_sort Fuereder, Thorsten
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Endothelial progenitor cells (CEPs) and circulating endothelial cells (CECs) are potential biomarkers of response to anti-angiogenic treatment regimens. In the current study, we investigated the effect of docetaxel and sunitinib on CEP/CEC kinetics and clinical response in castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemonaive patients with CRPC were enrolled in this study to receive either sunitinib (37.5 mg/d), in combination with docetaxel (75 mg/m(2)) or docetaxel alone. CEP and CEC kinetics were analyzed for every cycle. The primary objective was to compare CEP/CEC pharmacodynamics between both treatment arms. We also investigated if CEC/CEP spikes, induced by MTD docetaxel, are suppressed by sunitinib in patients treated with docetaxel/sunitinib relative to docetaxel monotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 27 patients were enrolled. We observed a significant increase of CEP/CEC (total/viable) counts over time within each cycle (coefficients 0.29233, 0.22092 and 0.26089, respectively; p<0.001). However, no differences between the treatment groups, in terms of CEP and CEC kinetics, were detected. In the docetaxel monotherapy arm 4 (30%) patients responded to therapy with a 50% PSA decline, while 9 (64%) patients showed a PSA decline in the combination group (n.s.). The median PFS in the docetaxel monotherapy group was 3.1 months (2.6–3.6 months, 95% CI) and 6.2 months (4.9–7.4 months, 95% CI; p = 0.062) in the combination arm. Sunitinib/docetaxel was reasonably well tolerated and toxicity manageable. CONCLUSION: In summary, no significant differences in CEC and CEP kinetics between the treatment arms were observed, although a highly significant increase of CEPs/CECs within each cycle over time was detected. These results mirror the challenge we have to face when employing anti-angiogenic strategies in CRPC. Additional preclinical research is needed to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms. However, docetaxel/sunitinib therapy resulted in a better response in terms of PSA decline and a trend towards improved PFS. TRIAL REGISTERY: clinicaltrialsregister.eu EudraCT 2007-003705-27
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3995874
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39958742014-04-25 Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Randomized, Controlled, Biomarker Study Fuereder, Thorsten Wacheck, Volker Strommer, Sabine Horak, Peter Gerschpacher, Marion Lamm, Wolfgang Kivaranovic, Danijel Krainer, Michael PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Endothelial progenitor cells (CEPs) and circulating endothelial cells (CECs) are potential biomarkers of response to anti-angiogenic treatment regimens. In the current study, we investigated the effect of docetaxel and sunitinib on CEP/CEC kinetics and clinical response in castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemonaive patients with CRPC were enrolled in this study to receive either sunitinib (37.5 mg/d), in combination with docetaxel (75 mg/m(2)) or docetaxel alone. CEP and CEC kinetics were analyzed for every cycle. The primary objective was to compare CEP/CEC pharmacodynamics between both treatment arms. We also investigated if CEC/CEP spikes, induced by MTD docetaxel, are suppressed by sunitinib in patients treated with docetaxel/sunitinib relative to docetaxel monotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 27 patients were enrolled. We observed a significant increase of CEP/CEC (total/viable) counts over time within each cycle (coefficients 0.29233, 0.22092 and 0.26089, respectively; p<0.001). However, no differences between the treatment groups, in terms of CEP and CEC kinetics, were detected. In the docetaxel monotherapy arm 4 (30%) patients responded to therapy with a 50% PSA decline, while 9 (64%) patients showed a PSA decline in the combination group (n.s.). The median PFS in the docetaxel monotherapy group was 3.1 months (2.6–3.6 months, 95% CI) and 6.2 months (4.9–7.4 months, 95% CI; p = 0.062) in the combination arm. Sunitinib/docetaxel was reasonably well tolerated and toxicity manageable. CONCLUSION: In summary, no significant differences in CEC and CEP kinetics between the treatment arms were observed, although a highly significant increase of CEPs/CECs within each cycle over time was detected. These results mirror the challenge we have to face when employing anti-angiogenic strategies in CRPC. Additional preclinical research is needed to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms. However, docetaxel/sunitinib therapy resulted in a better response in terms of PSA decline and a trend towards improved PFS. TRIAL REGISTERY: clinicaltrialsregister.eu EudraCT 2007-003705-27 Public Library of Science 2014-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3995874/ /pubmed/24755958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095310 Text en © 2014 Fuereder et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fuereder, Thorsten
Wacheck, Volker
Strommer, Sabine
Horak, Peter
Gerschpacher, Marion
Lamm, Wolfgang
Kivaranovic, Danijel
Krainer, Michael
Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Randomized, Controlled, Biomarker Study
title Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Randomized, Controlled, Biomarker Study
title_full Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Randomized, Controlled, Biomarker Study
title_fullStr Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Randomized, Controlled, Biomarker Study
title_full_unstemmed Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Randomized, Controlled, Biomarker Study
title_short Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Randomized, Controlled, Biomarker Study
title_sort circulating endothelial progenitor cells in castration resistant prostate cancer: a randomized, controlled, biomarker study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3995874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24755958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095310
work_keys_str_mv AT fuerederthorsten circulatingendothelialprogenitorcellsincastrationresistantprostatecancerarandomizedcontrolledbiomarkerstudy
AT wacheckvolker circulatingendothelialprogenitorcellsincastrationresistantprostatecancerarandomizedcontrolledbiomarkerstudy
AT strommersabine circulatingendothelialprogenitorcellsincastrationresistantprostatecancerarandomizedcontrolledbiomarkerstudy
AT horakpeter circulatingendothelialprogenitorcellsincastrationresistantprostatecancerarandomizedcontrolledbiomarkerstudy
AT gerschpachermarion circulatingendothelialprogenitorcellsincastrationresistantprostatecancerarandomizedcontrolledbiomarkerstudy
AT lammwolfgang circulatingendothelialprogenitorcellsincastrationresistantprostatecancerarandomizedcontrolledbiomarkerstudy
AT kivaranovicdanijel circulatingendothelialprogenitorcellsincastrationresistantprostatecancerarandomizedcontrolledbiomarkerstudy
AT krainermichael circulatingendothelialprogenitorcellsincastrationresistantprostatecancerarandomizedcontrolledbiomarkerstudy