Cargando…

Should women with chronic pelvic pain have adhesiolysis?

BACKGROUND: Pelvic adhesions are found in up to 50% of women with CPP during investigative surgeries and adhesiolysis is often performed as part of their management although the causal or casual association of adhesions, and the clinical benefit of adhesiolysis in the context of CPP is still unclear...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheong, Ying C, Reading, Isobel, Bailey, Sarah, Sadek, Khaled, Ledger, William, Li, Tin C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3996009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24588989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-14-36
_version_ 1782312971416895488
author Cheong, Ying C
Reading, Isobel
Bailey, Sarah
Sadek, Khaled
Ledger, William
Li, Tin C
author_facet Cheong, Ying C
Reading, Isobel
Bailey, Sarah
Sadek, Khaled
Ledger, William
Li, Tin C
author_sort Cheong, Ying C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pelvic adhesions are found in up to 50% of women with CPP during investigative surgeries and adhesiolysis is often performed as part of their management although the causal or casual association of adhesions, and the clinical benefit of adhesiolysis in the context of CPP is still unclear. Our aim was to test the hypothesis of whether laparoscopic adhesiolysis leads to significant pain relief and improvement in quality of life (QoL) in patients with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and adhesions. METHODS: This was a double-blinded RCT. This study was conducted in 2 tertiary referral hospitals in United Kingdom over 4 years. Women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) were randomized into having laparoscopic adhesiolysis or diagnostic laparoscopy. Women were assessed at 0, 3 and 6 months for Visual analogue scale scores (VAS) and Quality of Life (QoL) measures (SF-12 and EHP-30). RESULTS: A total of 92 participants were recruited; 50 qualified to be randomized, with 26 in the adhesiolysis and 24 in the control group. The results are expressed in median (interquartile ranges). In women who underwent adhesiolysis, there was a significant improvement at 6 months in VAS scores (-17.5 (-36.0 - -5.0) compared to controls (-1.5 (-15.0 – 4.5; p = 0.048); SF-12 scores physical component score (25.0 (18.8 – 43.8)) compared to controls (6.3 (-6.3 – 18.8); p = 0.021), SF-12 emotional component score 32.5 (4.4 – 48.8) compared to controls -5 (-21.3 – 15.0); p < 0.0074) and EHP-30 emotional well being domain 32.5 (4.4 – 48.8) compared to the controls -5 (-21.3 – 15.0; p < 0.0074). CONCLUSIONS: This study stopped before recruitment reached the statistically powered sample size due to difficulty with enrollment and lack of continued funding. In selected population of women presenting to the gynecological clinic with chronic pelvic pain, adhesiolysis in those who have adhesions may be of benefit in terms of improvement of pain and their quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 43852269
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3996009
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39960092014-04-24 Should women with chronic pelvic pain have adhesiolysis? Cheong, Ying C Reading, Isobel Bailey, Sarah Sadek, Khaled Ledger, William Li, Tin C BMC Womens Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Pelvic adhesions are found in up to 50% of women with CPP during investigative surgeries and adhesiolysis is often performed as part of their management although the causal or casual association of adhesions, and the clinical benefit of adhesiolysis in the context of CPP is still unclear. Our aim was to test the hypothesis of whether laparoscopic adhesiolysis leads to significant pain relief and improvement in quality of life (QoL) in patients with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and adhesions. METHODS: This was a double-blinded RCT. This study was conducted in 2 tertiary referral hospitals in United Kingdom over 4 years. Women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) were randomized into having laparoscopic adhesiolysis or diagnostic laparoscopy. Women were assessed at 0, 3 and 6 months for Visual analogue scale scores (VAS) and Quality of Life (QoL) measures (SF-12 and EHP-30). RESULTS: A total of 92 participants were recruited; 50 qualified to be randomized, with 26 in the adhesiolysis and 24 in the control group. The results are expressed in median (interquartile ranges). In women who underwent adhesiolysis, there was a significant improvement at 6 months in VAS scores (-17.5 (-36.0 - -5.0) compared to controls (-1.5 (-15.0 – 4.5; p = 0.048); SF-12 scores physical component score (25.0 (18.8 – 43.8)) compared to controls (6.3 (-6.3 – 18.8); p = 0.021), SF-12 emotional component score 32.5 (4.4 – 48.8) compared to controls -5 (-21.3 – 15.0); p < 0.0074) and EHP-30 emotional well being domain 32.5 (4.4 – 48.8) compared to the controls -5 (-21.3 – 15.0; p < 0.0074). CONCLUSIONS: This study stopped before recruitment reached the statistically powered sample size due to difficulty with enrollment and lack of continued funding. In selected population of women presenting to the gynecological clinic with chronic pelvic pain, adhesiolysis in those who have adhesions may be of benefit in terms of improvement of pain and their quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 43852269 BioMed Central 2014-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3996009/ /pubmed/24588989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-14-36 Text en Copyright © 2014 Cheong et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cheong, Ying C
Reading, Isobel
Bailey, Sarah
Sadek, Khaled
Ledger, William
Li, Tin C
Should women with chronic pelvic pain have adhesiolysis?
title Should women with chronic pelvic pain have adhesiolysis?
title_full Should women with chronic pelvic pain have adhesiolysis?
title_fullStr Should women with chronic pelvic pain have adhesiolysis?
title_full_unstemmed Should women with chronic pelvic pain have adhesiolysis?
title_short Should women with chronic pelvic pain have adhesiolysis?
title_sort should women with chronic pelvic pain have adhesiolysis?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3996009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24588989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-14-36
work_keys_str_mv AT cheongyingc shouldwomenwithchronicpelvicpainhaveadhesiolysis
AT readingisobel shouldwomenwithchronicpelvicpainhaveadhesiolysis
AT baileysarah shouldwomenwithchronicpelvicpainhaveadhesiolysis
AT sadekkhaled shouldwomenwithchronicpelvicpainhaveadhesiolysis
AT ledgerwilliam shouldwomenwithchronicpelvicpainhaveadhesiolysis
AT litinc shouldwomenwithchronicpelvicpainhaveadhesiolysis