Cargando…
Rescue karyotyping: a case series of array-based comparative genomic hybridization evaluation of archival conceptual tissue
BACKGROUND: Determination of fetal aneuploidy is central to evaluation of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). However, obtaining this information at the time of a miscarriage is not always possible or may not have been ordered. Here we report on “rescue karyotyping”, wherein DNA extracted from archived...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3996014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24589081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-12-19 |
_version_ | 1782312972614369280 |
---|---|
author | Kudesia, Rashmi Li, Marilyn Smith, Janice Patel, Ankita Williams, Zev |
author_facet | Kudesia, Rashmi Li, Marilyn Smith, Janice Patel, Ankita Williams, Zev |
author_sort | Kudesia, Rashmi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Determination of fetal aneuploidy is central to evaluation of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). However, obtaining this information at the time of a miscarriage is not always possible or may not have been ordered. Here we report on “rescue karyotyping”, wherein DNA extracted from archived paraffin-embedded pregnancy loss tissue from a prior dilation and curettage (D&C) is evaluated by array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). METHODS: A retrospective case series was conducted at an academic medical center. Patients included had unexplained RPL and a prior pregnancy loss for which karyotype information would be clinically informative but was unavailable. After extracting DNA from slides of archived tissue, aCGH with a reduced stringency approach was performed, allowing for analysis of partially degraded DNA. Statistics were computed using STATA v12.1 (College Station, TX). RESULTS: Rescue karyotyping was attempted on 20 specimens from 17 women. DNA was successfully extracted in 16 samples (80.0%), enabling analysis at either high or low resolution. The longest interval from tissue collection to DNA extraction was 4.2 years. There was no significant difference in specimen sufficiency for analysis in the collection-to-extraction interval (p = 0.14) or gestational age at pregnancy loss (p = 0.32). Eight specimens showed copy number variants: 3 trisomies, 2 partial chromosomal deletions, 1 mosaic abnormality and 2 unclassified variants. CONCLUSIONS: Rescue karyotyping using aCGH on DNA extracted from paraffin-embedded tissue provides the opportunity to obtain critical fetal cytogenetic information from a prior loss, even if it occurred years earlier. Given the ubiquitous archiving of paraffin embedded tissue obtained during a D&C and the ease of obtaining results despite long loss-to-testing intervals or early gestational age at time of fetal demise, this may provide a useful technique in the evaluation of couples with recurrent pregnancy loss. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3996014 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39960142014-04-24 Rescue karyotyping: a case series of array-based comparative genomic hybridization evaluation of archival conceptual tissue Kudesia, Rashmi Li, Marilyn Smith, Janice Patel, Ankita Williams, Zev Reprod Biol Endocrinol Methodology BACKGROUND: Determination of fetal aneuploidy is central to evaluation of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). However, obtaining this information at the time of a miscarriage is not always possible or may not have been ordered. Here we report on “rescue karyotyping”, wherein DNA extracted from archived paraffin-embedded pregnancy loss tissue from a prior dilation and curettage (D&C) is evaluated by array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). METHODS: A retrospective case series was conducted at an academic medical center. Patients included had unexplained RPL and a prior pregnancy loss for which karyotype information would be clinically informative but was unavailable. After extracting DNA from slides of archived tissue, aCGH with a reduced stringency approach was performed, allowing for analysis of partially degraded DNA. Statistics were computed using STATA v12.1 (College Station, TX). RESULTS: Rescue karyotyping was attempted on 20 specimens from 17 women. DNA was successfully extracted in 16 samples (80.0%), enabling analysis at either high or low resolution. The longest interval from tissue collection to DNA extraction was 4.2 years. There was no significant difference in specimen sufficiency for analysis in the collection-to-extraction interval (p = 0.14) or gestational age at pregnancy loss (p = 0.32). Eight specimens showed copy number variants: 3 trisomies, 2 partial chromosomal deletions, 1 mosaic abnormality and 2 unclassified variants. CONCLUSIONS: Rescue karyotyping using aCGH on DNA extracted from paraffin-embedded tissue provides the opportunity to obtain critical fetal cytogenetic information from a prior loss, even if it occurred years earlier. Given the ubiquitous archiving of paraffin embedded tissue obtained during a D&C and the ease of obtaining results despite long loss-to-testing intervals or early gestational age at time of fetal demise, this may provide a useful technique in the evaluation of couples with recurrent pregnancy loss. BioMed Central 2014-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3996014/ /pubmed/24589081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-12-19 Text en Copyright © 2014 Kudesia et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Kudesia, Rashmi Li, Marilyn Smith, Janice Patel, Ankita Williams, Zev Rescue karyotyping: a case series of array-based comparative genomic hybridization evaluation of archival conceptual tissue |
title | Rescue karyotyping: a case series of array-based comparative genomic hybridization evaluation of archival conceptual tissue |
title_full | Rescue karyotyping: a case series of array-based comparative genomic hybridization evaluation of archival conceptual tissue |
title_fullStr | Rescue karyotyping: a case series of array-based comparative genomic hybridization evaluation of archival conceptual tissue |
title_full_unstemmed | Rescue karyotyping: a case series of array-based comparative genomic hybridization evaluation of archival conceptual tissue |
title_short | Rescue karyotyping: a case series of array-based comparative genomic hybridization evaluation of archival conceptual tissue |
title_sort | rescue karyotyping: a case series of array-based comparative genomic hybridization evaluation of archival conceptual tissue |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3996014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24589081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-12-19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kudesiarashmi rescuekaryotypingacaseseriesofarraybasedcomparativegenomichybridizationevaluationofarchivalconceptualtissue AT limarilyn rescuekaryotypingacaseseriesofarraybasedcomparativegenomichybridizationevaluationofarchivalconceptualtissue AT smithjanice rescuekaryotypingacaseseriesofarraybasedcomparativegenomichybridizationevaluationofarchivalconceptualtissue AT patelankita rescuekaryotypingacaseseriesofarraybasedcomparativegenomichybridizationevaluationofarchivalconceptualtissue AT williamszev rescuekaryotypingacaseseriesofarraybasedcomparativegenomichybridizationevaluationofarchivalconceptualtissue |