Cargando…

Rescue karyotyping: a case series of array-based comparative genomic hybridization evaluation of archival conceptual tissue

BACKGROUND: Determination of fetal aneuploidy is central to evaluation of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). However, obtaining this information at the time of a miscarriage is not always possible or may not have been ordered. Here we report on “rescue karyotyping”, wherein DNA extracted from archived...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kudesia, Rashmi, Li, Marilyn, Smith, Janice, Patel, Ankita, Williams, Zev
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3996014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24589081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-12-19
_version_ 1782312972614369280
author Kudesia, Rashmi
Li, Marilyn
Smith, Janice
Patel, Ankita
Williams, Zev
author_facet Kudesia, Rashmi
Li, Marilyn
Smith, Janice
Patel, Ankita
Williams, Zev
author_sort Kudesia, Rashmi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Determination of fetal aneuploidy is central to evaluation of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). However, obtaining this information at the time of a miscarriage is not always possible or may not have been ordered. Here we report on “rescue karyotyping”, wherein DNA extracted from archived paraffin-embedded pregnancy loss tissue from a prior dilation and curettage (D&C) is evaluated by array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). METHODS: A retrospective case series was conducted at an academic medical center. Patients included had unexplained RPL and a prior pregnancy loss for which karyotype information would be clinically informative but was unavailable. After extracting DNA from slides of archived tissue, aCGH with a reduced stringency approach was performed, allowing for analysis of partially degraded DNA. Statistics were computed using STATA v12.1 (College Station, TX). RESULTS: Rescue karyotyping was attempted on 20 specimens from 17 women. DNA was successfully extracted in 16 samples (80.0%), enabling analysis at either high or low resolution. The longest interval from tissue collection to DNA extraction was 4.2 years. There was no significant difference in specimen sufficiency for analysis in the collection-to-extraction interval (p = 0.14) or gestational age at pregnancy loss (p = 0.32). Eight specimens showed copy number variants: 3 trisomies, 2 partial chromosomal deletions, 1 mosaic abnormality and 2 unclassified variants. CONCLUSIONS: Rescue karyotyping using aCGH on DNA extracted from paraffin-embedded tissue provides the opportunity to obtain critical fetal cytogenetic information from a prior loss, even if it occurred years earlier. Given the ubiquitous archiving of paraffin embedded tissue obtained during a D&C and the ease of obtaining results despite long loss-to-testing intervals or early gestational age at time of fetal demise, this may provide a useful technique in the evaluation of couples with recurrent pregnancy loss.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3996014
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39960142014-04-24 Rescue karyotyping: a case series of array-based comparative genomic hybridization evaluation of archival conceptual tissue Kudesia, Rashmi Li, Marilyn Smith, Janice Patel, Ankita Williams, Zev Reprod Biol Endocrinol Methodology BACKGROUND: Determination of fetal aneuploidy is central to evaluation of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). However, obtaining this information at the time of a miscarriage is not always possible or may not have been ordered. Here we report on “rescue karyotyping”, wherein DNA extracted from archived paraffin-embedded pregnancy loss tissue from a prior dilation and curettage (D&C) is evaluated by array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). METHODS: A retrospective case series was conducted at an academic medical center. Patients included had unexplained RPL and a prior pregnancy loss for which karyotype information would be clinically informative but was unavailable. After extracting DNA from slides of archived tissue, aCGH with a reduced stringency approach was performed, allowing for analysis of partially degraded DNA. Statistics were computed using STATA v12.1 (College Station, TX). RESULTS: Rescue karyotyping was attempted on 20 specimens from 17 women. DNA was successfully extracted in 16 samples (80.0%), enabling analysis at either high or low resolution. The longest interval from tissue collection to DNA extraction was 4.2 years. There was no significant difference in specimen sufficiency for analysis in the collection-to-extraction interval (p = 0.14) or gestational age at pregnancy loss (p = 0.32). Eight specimens showed copy number variants: 3 trisomies, 2 partial chromosomal deletions, 1 mosaic abnormality and 2 unclassified variants. CONCLUSIONS: Rescue karyotyping using aCGH on DNA extracted from paraffin-embedded tissue provides the opportunity to obtain critical fetal cytogenetic information from a prior loss, even if it occurred years earlier. Given the ubiquitous archiving of paraffin embedded tissue obtained during a D&C and the ease of obtaining results despite long loss-to-testing intervals or early gestational age at time of fetal demise, this may provide a useful technique in the evaluation of couples with recurrent pregnancy loss. BioMed Central 2014-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3996014/ /pubmed/24589081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-12-19 Text en Copyright © 2014 Kudesia et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology
Kudesia, Rashmi
Li, Marilyn
Smith, Janice
Patel, Ankita
Williams, Zev
Rescue karyotyping: a case series of array-based comparative genomic hybridization evaluation of archival conceptual tissue
title Rescue karyotyping: a case series of array-based comparative genomic hybridization evaluation of archival conceptual tissue
title_full Rescue karyotyping: a case series of array-based comparative genomic hybridization evaluation of archival conceptual tissue
title_fullStr Rescue karyotyping: a case series of array-based comparative genomic hybridization evaluation of archival conceptual tissue
title_full_unstemmed Rescue karyotyping: a case series of array-based comparative genomic hybridization evaluation of archival conceptual tissue
title_short Rescue karyotyping: a case series of array-based comparative genomic hybridization evaluation of archival conceptual tissue
title_sort rescue karyotyping: a case series of array-based comparative genomic hybridization evaluation of archival conceptual tissue
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3996014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24589081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-12-19
work_keys_str_mv AT kudesiarashmi rescuekaryotypingacaseseriesofarraybasedcomparativegenomichybridizationevaluationofarchivalconceptualtissue
AT limarilyn rescuekaryotypingacaseseriesofarraybasedcomparativegenomichybridizationevaluationofarchivalconceptualtissue
AT smithjanice rescuekaryotypingacaseseriesofarraybasedcomparativegenomichybridizationevaluationofarchivalconceptualtissue
AT patelankita rescuekaryotypingacaseseriesofarraybasedcomparativegenomichybridizationevaluationofarchivalconceptualtissue
AT williamszev rescuekaryotypingacaseseriesofarraybasedcomparativegenomichybridizationevaluationofarchivalconceptualtissue