Cargando…

A cost-utility analysis of drug treatments in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B in Thailand

BACKGROUND: Only lamivudine has been included for patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in the National List of Essential Drugs (NLED), a pharmaceutical reimbursement list in Thailand. There have also been no economic evaluation studies of CHB drug treatments conducted in Thailand yet. In order to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tantai, Narisa, Chaikledkaew, Usa, Tanwandee, Tawesak, Werayingyong, Pitsaphun, Teerawattananon, Yot
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3996169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24731689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-170
_version_ 1782313003156242432
author Tantai, Narisa
Chaikledkaew, Usa
Tanwandee, Tawesak
Werayingyong, Pitsaphun
Teerawattananon, Yot
author_facet Tantai, Narisa
Chaikledkaew, Usa
Tanwandee, Tawesak
Werayingyong, Pitsaphun
Teerawattananon, Yot
author_sort Tantai, Narisa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Only lamivudine has been included for patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in the National List of Essential Drugs (NLED), a pharmaceutical reimbursement list in Thailand. There have also been no economic evaluation studies of CHB drug treatments conducted in Thailand yet. In order to fill this gap in policy research, the objective of this study was to compare the cost-utility of each drug therapy (Figure 1) with palliative care in patients with HBeAg-positive CHB. METHODS: A cost-utility analysis using an economic evaluation model was performed to compare each drug treatment for HBeAg-positive CHB patients. A Markov model was used to estimate the relevant costs and health outcomes during a lifetime horizon based on a societal perspective. Direct medical costs, direct non-medical costs, and indirect costs were included, and health outcomes were denoted in life years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The results were presented as an incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) in Thai baht (THB) per LY or QALY gained. One-way sensitivity and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were applied to investigate the effects of model parameter uncertainties. RESULTS: The ICER values of providing generic lamivudine with the addition of tenofovir when drug resistance occurred, generic lamivudine with the addition of tenofovir based on the road map guideline, and tenofovir monotherapy were -14,000 (USD -467), -8,000 (USD -267) , and -5,000 (USD -167) THB per QALY gained, respectively. However, when taking into account all parameter uncertainties in the model, providing generic lamivudine with the addition of tenofovir when drug resistance occurred (78% and 75%) and tenofovir monotherapy (18% and 24%) would yield higher probabilities of being cost-effective at the societal willingness to pay thresholds of 100,000 (USD 3,333) and 300,000 (USD 10,000) THB per QALY gained in Thailand, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the policy recommendations from this study, the Thai government decided to include tenofovir into the NLED in addition to generic lamivudine which is already on the list. Moreover, the results have shown that the preferred treatment regimen involves using generic lamivudine as the first-line drug with tenofovir added if drug resistance occurs in HBeAg-positive CHB patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3996169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39961692014-04-24 A cost-utility analysis of drug treatments in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B in Thailand Tantai, Narisa Chaikledkaew, Usa Tanwandee, Tawesak Werayingyong, Pitsaphun Teerawattananon, Yot BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Only lamivudine has been included for patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in the National List of Essential Drugs (NLED), a pharmaceutical reimbursement list in Thailand. There have also been no economic evaluation studies of CHB drug treatments conducted in Thailand yet. In order to fill this gap in policy research, the objective of this study was to compare the cost-utility of each drug therapy (Figure 1) with palliative care in patients with HBeAg-positive CHB. METHODS: A cost-utility analysis using an economic evaluation model was performed to compare each drug treatment for HBeAg-positive CHB patients. A Markov model was used to estimate the relevant costs and health outcomes during a lifetime horizon based on a societal perspective. Direct medical costs, direct non-medical costs, and indirect costs were included, and health outcomes were denoted in life years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The results were presented as an incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) in Thai baht (THB) per LY or QALY gained. One-way sensitivity and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were applied to investigate the effects of model parameter uncertainties. RESULTS: The ICER values of providing generic lamivudine with the addition of tenofovir when drug resistance occurred, generic lamivudine with the addition of tenofovir based on the road map guideline, and tenofovir monotherapy were -14,000 (USD -467), -8,000 (USD -267) , and -5,000 (USD -167) THB per QALY gained, respectively. However, when taking into account all parameter uncertainties in the model, providing generic lamivudine with the addition of tenofovir when drug resistance occurred (78% and 75%) and tenofovir monotherapy (18% and 24%) would yield higher probabilities of being cost-effective at the societal willingness to pay thresholds of 100,000 (USD 3,333) and 300,000 (USD 10,000) THB per QALY gained in Thailand, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the policy recommendations from this study, the Thai government decided to include tenofovir into the NLED in addition to generic lamivudine which is already on the list. Moreover, the results have shown that the preferred treatment regimen involves using generic lamivudine as the first-line drug with tenofovir added if drug resistance occurs in HBeAg-positive CHB patients. BioMed Central 2014-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3996169/ /pubmed/24731689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-170 Text en Copyright © 2014 Tantai et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tantai, Narisa
Chaikledkaew, Usa
Tanwandee, Tawesak
Werayingyong, Pitsaphun
Teerawattananon, Yot
A cost-utility analysis of drug treatments in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B in Thailand
title A cost-utility analysis of drug treatments in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B in Thailand
title_full A cost-utility analysis of drug treatments in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B in Thailand
title_fullStr A cost-utility analysis of drug treatments in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B in Thailand
title_full_unstemmed A cost-utility analysis of drug treatments in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B in Thailand
title_short A cost-utility analysis of drug treatments in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B in Thailand
title_sort cost-utility analysis of drug treatments in patients with hbeag-positive chronic hepatitis b in thailand
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3996169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24731689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-170
work_keys_str_mv AT tantainarisa acostutilityanalysisofdrugtreatmentsinpatientswithhbeagpositivechronichepatitisbinthailand
AT chaikledkaewusa acostutilityanalysisofdrugtreatmentsinpatientswithhbeagpositivechronichepatitisbinthailand
AT tanwandeetawesak acostutilityanalysisofdrugtreatmentsinpatientswithhbeagpositivechronichepatitisbinthailand
AT werayingyongpitsaphun acostutilityanalysisofdrugtreatmentsinpatientswithhbeagpositivechronichepatitisbinthailand
AT teerawattananonyot acostutilityanalysisofdrugtreatmentsinpatientswithhbeagpositivechronichepatitisbinthailand
AT tantainarisa costutilityanalysisofdrugtreatmentsinpatientswithhbeagpositivechronichepatitisbinthailand
AT chaikledkaewusa costutilityanalysisofdrugtreatmentsinpatientswithhbeagpositivechronichepatitisbinthailand
AT tanwandeetawesak costutilityanalysisofdrugtreatmentsinpatientswithhbeagpositivechronichepatitisbinthailand
AT werayingyongpitsaphun costutilityanalysisofdrugtreatmentsinpatientswithhbeagpositivechronichepatitisbinthailand
AT teerawattananonyot costutilityanalysisofdrugtreatmentsinpatientswithhbeagpositivechronichepatitisbinthailand