Cargando…

Investigation of variability in image acquisition and contouring during 3D ultrasound guidance for partial breast irradiation

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional ultrasound (3DUS) at simulation compared to 3DUS at treatment is an image guidance option for partial breast irradiation (PBI). This study assessed if user dependence in acquiring and contouring 3DUS (operator variability) contributed to variation in seroma shifts calcu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Landry, Anthony, Berrang, Tanya, Gagne, Isabelle, Popescu, Carmen, Mitchell, Tracy, Vey, Hazel, Sand, Letricia, Soh, Siew Yan, Wark, Jill, Olivotto, Ivo, Beckham, Wayne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3996185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24467876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-35
_version_ 1782313006807384064
author Landry, Anthony
Berrang, Tanya
Gagne, Isabelle
Popescu, Carmen
Mitchell, Tracy
Vey, Hazel
Sand, Letricia
Soh, Siew Yan
Wark, Jill
Olivotto, Ivo
Beckham, Wayne
author_facet Landry, Anthony
Berrang, Tanya
Gagne, Isabelle
Popescu, Carmen
Mitchell, Tracy
Vey, Hazel
Sand, Letricia
Soh, Siew Yan
Wark, Jill
Olivotto, Ivo
Beckham, Wayne
author_sort Landry, Anthony
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional ultrasound (3DUS) at simulation compared to 3DUS at treatment is an image guidance option for partial breast irradiation (PBI). This study assessed if user dependence in acquiring and contouring 3DUS (operator variability) contributed to variation in seroma shifts calculated for breast IGRT. METHODS: Eligible patients met breast criteria for current randomized PBI studies. 5 Operators participated in this study. For each patient, 3 operators were involved in scan acquisitions and 5 were involved in contouring. At CT simulation (CT1), a 3DUS (US1) was performed by a single radiation therapist (RT). 7 to 14 days after CT1 a second CT (CT2) and 3 sequential 3DUS scans (US2a,b,c) were acquired by each of 3 RTs. Seroma shifts, between US1 and US2 scans were calculated by comparing geometric centers of the seromas (centroids). Operator contouring variability was determined by comparing 5 RT’s contours for a single image set. Scanning variability was assessed by comparing shifts between multiple scans acquired at the same time point (US1-US2a,b,c). Shifts in seromas contoured on CT (CT1-CT2) were compared to US data. RESULTS: From an initial 28 patients, 15 had CT visible seromas, met PBI dosimetric constraints, had complete US data, and were analyzed. Operator variability contributed more to the overall variability in seroma localization than the variability associated with multiple scan acquisitions (95% confidence mean uncertainty of 6.2 mm vs. 1.1 mm). The mean standard deviation in seroma shift was user dependent and ranged from 1.7 to 2.9 mm. Mean seroma shifts from simulation to treatment were comparable to CT. CONCLUSIONS: Variability in shifts due to different users acquiring and contouring 3DUS for PBI guidance were comparable to CT shifts. Substantial inter-observer effect needs to be considered during clinical implementation of 3DUS IGRT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3996185
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39961852014-04-24 Investigation of variability in image acquisition and contouring during 3D ultrasound guidance for partial breast irradiation Landry, Anthony Berrang, Tanya Gagne, Isabelle Popescu, Carmen Mitchell, Tracy Vey, Hazel Sand, Letricia Soh, Siew Yan Wark, Jill Olivotto, Ivo Beckham, Wayne Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional ultrasound (3DUS) at simulation compared to 3DUS at treatment is an image guidance option for partial breast irradiation (PBI). This study assessed if user dependence in acquiring and contouring 3DUS (operator variability) contributed to variation in seroma shifts calculated for breast IGRT. METHODS: Eligible patients met breast criteria for current randomized PBI studies. 5 Operators participated in this study. For each patient, 3 operators were involved in scan acquisitions and 5 were involved in contouring. At CT simulation (CT1), a 3DUS (US1) was performed by a single radiation therapist (RT). 7 to 14 days after CT1 a second CT (CT2) and 3 sequential 3DUS scans (US2a,b,c) were acquired by each of 3 RTs. Seroma shifts, between US1 and US2 scans were calculated by comparing geometric centers of the seromas (centroids). Operator contouring variability was determined by comparing 5 RT’s contours for a single image set. Scanning variability was assessed by comparing shifts between multiple scans acquired at the same time point (US1-US2a,b,c). Shifts in seromas contoured on CT (CT1-CT2) were compared to US data. RESULTS: From an initial 28 patients, 15 had CT visible seromas, met PBI dosimetric constraints, had complete US data, and were analyzed. Operator variability contributed more to the overall variability in seroma localization than the variability associated with multiple scan acquisitions (95% confidence mean uncertainty of 6.2 mm vs. 1.1 mm). The mean standard deviation in seroma shift was user dependent and ranged from 1.7 to 2.9 mm. Mean seroma shifts from simulation to treatment were comparable to CT. CONCLUSIONS: Variability in shifts due to different users acquiring and contouring 3DUS for PBI guidance were comparable to CT shifts. Substantial inter-observer effect needs to be considered during clinical implementation of 3DUS IGRT. BioMed Central 2014-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3996185/ /pubmed/24467876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-35 Text en Copyright © 2014 Landry et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Landry, Anthony
Berrang, Tanya
Gagne, Isabelle
Popescu, Carmen
Mitchell, Tracy
Vey, Hazel
Sand, Letricia
Soh, Siew Yan
Wark, Jill
Olivotto, Ivo
Beckham, Wayne
Investigation of variability in image acquisition and contouring during 3D ultrasound guidance for partial breast irradiation
title Investigation of variability in image acquisition and contouring during 3D ultrasound guidance for partial breast irradiation
title_full Investigation of variability in image acquisition and contouring during 3D ultrasound guidance for partial breast irradiation
title_fullStr Investigation of variability in image acquisition and contouring during 3D ultrasound guidance for partial breast irradiation
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of variability in image acquisition and contouring during 3D ultrasound guidance for partial breast irradiation
title_short Investigation of variability in image acquisition and contouring during 3D ultrasound guidance for partial breast irradiation
title_sort investigation of variability in image acquisition and contouring during 3d ultrasound guidance for partial breast irradiation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3996185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24467876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-35
work_keys_str_mv AT landryanthony investigationofvariabilityinimageacquisitionandcontouringduring3dultrasoundguidanceforpartialbreastirradiation
AT berrangtanya investigationofvariabilityinimageacquisitionandcontouringduring3dultrasoundguidanceforpartialbreastirradiation
AT gagneisabelle investigationofvariabilityinimageacquisitionandcontouringduring3dultrasoundguidanceforpartialbreastirradiation
AT popescucarmen investigationofvariabilityinimageacquisitionandcontouringduring3dultrasoundguidanceforpartialbreastirradiation
AT mitchelltracy investigationofvariabilityinimageacquisitionandcontouringduring3dultrasoundguidanceforpartialbreastirradiation
AT veyhazel investigationofvariabilityinimageacquisitionandcontouringduring3dultrasoundguidanceforpartialbreastirradiation
AT sandletricia investigationofvariabilityinimageacquisitionandcontouringduring3dultrasoundguidanceforpartialbreastirradiation
AT sohsiewyan investigationofvariabilityinimageacquisitionandcontouringduring3dultrasoundguidanceforpartialbreastirradiation
AT warkjill investigationofvariabilityinimageacquisitionandcontouringduring3dultrasoundguidanceforpartialbreastirradiation
AT olivottoivo investigationofvariabilityinimageacquisitionandcontouringduring3dultrasoundguidanceforpartialbreastirradiation
AT beckhamwayne investigationofvariabilityinimageacquisitionandcontouringduring3dultrasoundguidanceforpartialbreastirradiation