Cargando…

Survival analysis of endometrial cancer patients with cervical stromal involvement

OBJECTIVE: Stage II endometrial cancer is relatively uncommon. There is no consensus for appropriate adjuvant therapy in endometrial cancer patients with cervical stromal involvement (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] stage II). This study investigates how adjuvant treatme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frandsen, Jonathan E., Sause, William T., Dodson, Mark K., Soisson, Andrew P., Belnap, Thomas W., Gaffney, David K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3996259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24761213
http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2014.25.2.105
_version_ 1782313014818504704
author Frandsen, Jonathan E.
Sause, William T.
Dodson, Mark K.
Soisson, Andrew P.
Belnap, Thomas W.
Gaffney, David K.
author_facet Frandsen, Jonathan E.
Sause, William T.
Dodson, Mark K.
Soisson, Andrew P.
Belnap, Thomas W.
Gaffney, David K.
author_sort Frandsen, Jonathan E.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Stage II endometrial cancer is relatively uncommon. There is no consensus for appropriate adjuvant therapy in endometrial cancer patients with cervical stromal involvement (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] stage II). This study investigates how adjuvant treatments and tumor characteristics influence overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in stage II patients in order to establish better treatment guidelines. METHODS: This multi-institution, Institutional Review Board approved, study is a retrospective review of 40 endometrial cancer patients with cervical stromal involvement treated from 1993 to 2009. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to evaluate OS and DFS. RESULTS: OS was 85% at three years and 67% at five years. There were no significant differences in age, histology, depth of invasion, comorbid conditions, surgical staging or recurrence between patients who received radiation therapy (RT) and those who did not. However, patients with FIGO grade 1 cancers were less likely to receive RT (p=0.007). Patients treated with RT had a similar 5 year OS (n=33, 69%) to those treated with surgery only (n=7, 60%, p=0.746). There were no OS differences when evaluating by grade, histology, or depth of invasion between patients who did and did not receive RT. Four patients recurred: three were locoregional failures only, and one failed locally and distant. CONCLUSION: Patients receiving RT had higher grade tumors. Despite this, OS was comparable between the RT and the no RT cohorts. Local failure was the predominant pattern of failure. Endometrial cancer patients with cervical stromal involvement likely receive better locoregional control with the addition of adjuvant RT and we continue to advocate for RT in most cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3996259
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39962592014-04-23 Survival analysis of endometrial cancer patients with cervical stromal involvement Frandsen, Jonathan E. Sause, William T. Dodson, Mark K. Soisson, Andrew P. Belnap, Thomas W. Gaffney, David K. J Gynecol Oncol Original Article OBJECTIVE: Stage II endometrial cancer is relatively uncommon. There is no consensus for appropriate adjuvant therapy in endometrial cancer patients with cervical stromal involvement (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] stage II). This study investigates how adjuvant treatments and tumor characteristics influence overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in stage II patients in order to establish better treatment guidelines. METHODS: This multi-institution, Institutional Review Board approved, study is a retrospective review of 40 endometrial cancer patients with cervical stromal involvement treated from 1993 to 2009. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to evaluate OS and DFS. RESULTS: OS was 85% at three years and 67% at five years. There were no significant differences in age, histology, depth of invasion, comorbid conditions, surgical staging or recurrence between patients who received radiation therapy (RT) and those who did not. However, patients with FIGO grade 1 cancers were less likely to receive RT (p=0.007). Patients treated with RT had a similar 5 year OS (n=33, 69%) to those treated with surgery only (n=7, 60%, p=0.746). There were no OS differences when evaluating by grade, histology, or depth of invasion between patients who did and did not receive RT. Four patients recurred: three were locoregional failures only, and one failed locally and distant. CONCLUSION: Patients receiving RT had higher grade tumors. Despite this, OS was comparable between the RT and the no RT cohorts. Local failure was the predominant pattern of failure. Endometrial cancer patients with cervical stromal involvement likely receive better locoregional control with the addition of adjuvant RT and we continue to advocate for RT in most cases. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2014-04 2014-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3996259/ /pubmed/24761213 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2014.25.2.105 Text en Copyright © 2014. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Frandsen, Jonathan E.
Sause, William T.
Dodson, Mark K.
Soisson, Andrew P.
Belnap, Thomas W.
Gaffney, David K.
Survival analysis of endometrial cancer patients with cervical stromal involvement
title Survival analysis of endometrial cancer patients with cervical stromal involvement
title_full Survival analysis of endometrial cancer patients with cervical stromal involvement
title_fullStr Survival analysis of endometrial cancer patients with cervical stromal involvement
title_full_unstemmed Survival analysis of endometrial cancer patients with cervical stromal involvement
title_short Survival analysis of endometrial cancer patients with cervical stromal involvement
title_sort survival analysis of endometrial cancer patients with cervical stromal involvement
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3996259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24761213
http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2014.25.2.105
work_keys_str_mv AT frandsenjonathane survivalanalysisofendometrialcancerpatientswithcervicalstromalinvolvement
AT sausewilliamt survivalanalysisofendometrialcancerpatientswithcervicalstromalinvolvement
AT dodsonmarkk survivalanalysisofendometrialcancerpatientswithcervicalstromalinvolvement
AT soissonandrewp survivalanalysisofendometrialcancerpatientswithcervicalstromalinvolvement
AT belnapthomasw survivalanalysisofendometrialcancerpatientswithcervicalstromalinvolvement
AT gaffneydavidk survivalanalysisofendometrialcancerpatientswithcervicalstromalinvolvement