Cargando…
Blur Detection is Unaffected by Cognitive Load
Blur detection is affected by retinal eccentricity, but is it also affected by attentional resources? Research showing effects of selective attention on acuity and contrast sensitivity suggests that allocating attention should increase blur detection. However, research showing that blur affects sele...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3996539/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24771997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2014.884203 |
_version_ | 1782313062527664128 |
---|---|
author | Loschky, Lester C. Ringer, Ryan V. Johnson, Aaron P. Larson, Adam M. Neider, Mark Kramer, Arthur F. |
author_facet | Loschky, Lester C. Ringer, Ryan V. Johnson, Aaron P. Larson, Adam M. Neider, Mark Kramer, Arthur F. |
author_sort | Loschky, Lester C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Blur detection is affected by retinal eccentricity, but is it also affected by attentional resources? Research showing effects of selective attention on acuity and contrast sensitivity suggests that allocating attention should increase blur detection. However, research showing that blur affects selection of saccade targets suggests that blur detection may be pre-attentive. To investigate this question, we carried out experiments in which viewers detected blur in real-world scenes under varying levels of cognitive load manipulated by the N-back task. We used adaptive threshold estimation to measure blur detection thresholds at 0°, 3°, 6°, and 9° eccentricity. Participants carried out blur detection as a single task, a single task with to-be-ignored letters, or an N-back task with four levels of cognitive load (0, 1, 2, or 3-back). In Experiment 1, blur was presented gaze-contingently for occasional single eye fixations while participants viewed scenes in preparation for an easy picture recognition memory task, and the N-back stimuli were presented auditorily. The results for three participants showed a large effect of retinal eccentricity on blur thresholds, significant effects of N-back level on N-back performance, scene recognition memory, and gaze dispersion, but no effect of N-back level on blur thresholds. In Experiment 2, we replicated Experiment 1 but presented the images tachistoscopically for 200 ms (half with, half without blur), to determine whether gaze-contingent blur presentation in Experiment 1 had produced attentional capture by blur onset during a fixation, thus eliminating any effect of cognitive load on blur detection. The results with three new participants replicated those of Experiment 1, indicating that the use of gaze-contingent blur presentation could not explain the lack of effect of cognitive load on blur detection. Thus, apparently blur detection in real-world scene images is unaffected by attentional resources, as manipulated by the cognitive load produced by the N-back task. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3996539 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39965392014-04-25 Blur Detection is Unaffected by Cognitive Load Loschky, Lester C. Ringer, Ryan V. Johnson, Aaron P. Larson, Adam M. Neider, Mark Kramer, Arthur F. Vis cogn Research Article Blur detection is affected by retinal eccentricity, but is it also affected by attentional resources? Research showing effects of selective attention on acuity and contrast sensitivity suggests that allocating attention should increase blur detection. However, research showing that blur affects selection of saccade targets suggests that blur detection may be pre-attentive. To investigate this question, we carried out experiments in which viewers detected blur in real-world scenes under varying levels of cognitive load manipulated by the N-back task. We used adaptive threshold estimation to measure blur detection thresholds at 0°, 3°, 6°, and 9° eccentricity. Participants carried out blur detection as a single task, a single task with to-be-ignored letters, or an N-back task with four levels of cognitive load (0, 1, 2, or 3-back). In Experiment 1, blur was presented gaze-contingently for occasional single eye fixations while participants viewed scenes in preparation for an easy picture recognition memory task, and the N-back stimuli were presented auditorily. The results for three participants showed a large effect of retinal eccentricity on blur thresholds, significant effects of N-back level on N-back performance, scene recognition memory, and gaze dispersion, but no effect of N-back level on blur thresholds. In Experiment 2, we replicated Experiment 1 but presented the images tachistoscopically for 200 ms (half with, half without blur), to determine whether gaze-contingent blur presentation in Experiment 1 had produced attentional capture by blur onset during a fixation, thus eliminating any effect of cognitive load on blur detection. The results with three new participants replicated those of Experiment 1, indicating that the use of gaze-contingent blur presentation could not explain the lack of effect of cognitive load on blur detection. Thus, apparently blur detection in real-world scene images is unaffected by attentional resources, as manipulated by the cognitive load produced by the N-back task. Taylor & Francis 2014-03-14 2014-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3996539/ /pubmed/24771997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2014.884203 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Published by Taylor & Francis. http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/uploads/iopenaccess_tcs.pdf This is an open access article distributed under the Supplemental Terms and Conditions for iOpenAccess articles published in Taylor & Francis journals (http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/uploads/iopenaccess_tcs.pdf) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This is an Open Access article. Non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly attributed, cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way, is permitted. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Loschky, Lester C. Ringer, Ryan V. Johnson, Aaron P. Larson, Adam M. Neider, Mark Kramer, Arthur F. Blur Detection is Unaffected by Cognitive Load |
title | Blur Detection is Unaffected by Cognitive Load |
title_full | Blur Detection is Unaffected by Cognitive Load |
title_fullStr | Blur Detection is Unaffected by Cognitive Load |
title_full_unstemmed | Blur Detection is Unaffected by Cognitive Load |
title_short | Blur Detection is Unaffected by Cognitive Load |
title_sort | blur detection is unaffected by cognitive load |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3996539/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24771997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2014.884203 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT loschkylesterc blurdetectionisunaffectedbycognitiveload AT ringerryanv blurdetectionisunaffectedbycognitiveload AT johnsonaaronp blurdetectionisunaffectedbycognitiveload AT larsonadamm blurdetectionisunaffectedbycognitiveload AT neidermark blurdetectionisunaffectedbycognitiveload AT kramerarthurf blurdetectionisunaffectedbycognitiveload |