Cargando…

Blur Detection is Unaffected by Cognitive Load

Blur detection is affected by retinal eccentricity, but is it also affected by attentional resources? Research showing effects of selective attention on acuity and contrast sensitivity suggests that allocating attention should increase blur detection. However, research showing that blur affects sele...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Loschky, Lester C., Ringer, Ryan V., Johnson, Aaron P., Larson, Adam M., Neider, Mark, Kramer, Arthur F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3996539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24771997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2014.884203
_version_ 1782313062527664128
author Loschky, Lester C.
Ringer, Ryan V.
Johnson, Aaron P.
Larson, Adam M.
Neider, Mark
Kramer, Arthur F.
author_facet Loschky, Lester C.
Ringer, Ryan V.
Johnson, Aaron P.
Larson, Adam M.
Neider, Mark
Kramer, Arthur F.
author_sort Loschky, Lester C.
collection PubMed
description Blur detection is affected by retinal eccentricity, but is it also affected by attentional resources? Research showing effects of selective attention on acuity and contrast sensitivity suggests that allocating attention should increase blur detection. However, research showing that blur affects selection of saccade targets suggests that blur detection may be pre-attentive. To investigate this question, we carried out experiments in which viewers detected blur in real-world scenes under varying levels of cognitive load manipulated by the N-back task. We used adaptive threshold estimation to measure blur detection thresholds at 0°, 3°, 6°, and 9° eccentricity. Participants carried out blur detection as a single task, a single task with to-be-ignored letters, or an N-back task with four levels of cognitive load (0, 1, 2, or 3-back). In Experiment 1, blur was presented gaze-contingently for occasional single eye fixations while participants viewed scenes in preparation for an easy picture recognition memory task, and the N-back stimuli were presented auditorily. The results for three participants showed a large effect of retinal eccentricity on blur thresholds, significant effects of N-back level on N-back performance, scene recognition memory, and gaze dispersion, but no effect of N-back level on blur thresholds. In Experiment 2, we replicated Experiment 1 but presented the images tachistoscopically for 200 ms (half with, half without blur), to determine whether gaze-contingent blur presentation in Experiment 1 had produced attentional capture by blur onset during a fixation, thus eliminating any effect of cognitive load on blur detection. The results with three new participants replicated those of Experiment 1, indicating that the use of gaze-contingent blur presentation could not explain the lack of effect of cognitive load on blur detection. Thus, apparently blur detection in real-world scene images is unaffected by attentional resources, as manipulated by the cognitive load produced by the N-back task.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3996539
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39965392014-04-25 Blur Detection is Unaffected by Cognitive Load Loschky, Lester C. Ringer, Ryan V. Johnson, Aaron P. Larson, Adam M. Neider, Mark Kramer, Arthur F. Vis cogn Research Article Blur detection is affected by retinal eccentricity, but is it also affected by attentional resources? Research showing effects of selective attention on acuity and contrast sensitivity suggests that allocating attention should increase blur detection. However, research showing that blur affects selection of saccade targets suggests that blur detection may be pre-attentive. To investigate this question, we carried out experiments in which viewers detected blur in real-world scenes under varying levels of cognitive load manipulated by the N-back task. We used adaptive threshold estimation to measure blur detection thresholds at 0°, 3°, 6°, and 9° eccentricity. Participants carried out blur detection as a single task, a single task with to-be-ignored letters, or an N-back task with four levels of cognitive load (0, 1, 2, or 3-back). In Experiment 1, blur was presented gaze-contingently for occasional single eye fixations while participants viewed scenes in preparation for an easy picture recognition memory task, and the N-back stimuli were presented auditorily. The results for three participants showed a large effect of retinal eccentricity on blur thresholds, significant effects of N-back level on N-back performance, scene recognition memory, and gaze dispersion, but no effect of N-back level on blur thresholds. In Experiment 2, we replicated Experiment 1 but presented the images tachistoscopically for 200 ms (half with, half without blur), to determine whether gaze-contingent blur presentation in Experiment 1 had produced attentional capture by blur onset during a fixation, thus eliminating any effect of cognitive load on blur detection. The results with three new participants replicated those of Experiment 1, indicating that the use of gaze-contingent blur presentation could not explain the lack of effect of cognitive load on blur detection. Thus, apparently blur detection in real-world scene images is unaffected by attentional resources, as manipulated by the cognitive load produced by the N-back task. Taylor & Francis 2014-03-14 2014-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3996539/ /pubmed/24771997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2014.884203 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Published by Taylor & Francis. http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/uploads/iopenaccess_tcs.pdf This is an open access article distributed under the Supplemental Terms and Conditions for iOpenAccess articles published in Taylor & Francis journals (http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/uploads/iopenaccess_tcs.pdf) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This is an Open Access article. Non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly attributed, cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way, is permitted. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted.
spellingShingle Research Article
Loschky, Lester C.
Ringer, Ryan V.
Johnson, Aaron P.
Larson, Adam M.
Neider, Mark
Kramer, Arthur F.
Blur Detection is Unaffected by Cognitive Load
title Blur Detection is Unaffected by Cognitive Load
title_full Blur Detection is Unaffected by Cognitive Load
title_fullStr Blur Detection is Unaffected by Cognitive Load
title_full_unstemmed Blur Detection is Unaffected by Cognitive Load
title_short Blur Detection is Unaffected by Cognitive Load
title_sort blur detection is unaffected by cognitive load
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3996539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24771997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2014.884203
work_keys_str_mv AT loschkylesterc blurdetectionisunaffectedbycognitiveload
AT ringerryanv blurdetectionisunaffectedbycognitiveload
AT johnsonaaronp blurdetectionisunaffectedbycognitiveload
AT larsonadamm blurdetectionisunaffectedbycognitiveload
AT neidermark blurdetectionisunaffectedbycognitiveload
AT kramerarthurf blurdetectionisunaffectedbycognitiveload