Cargando…

Indian Experience of Robotics in Gynecology

AIMS: To study the role of robotics in various gynaecological cases, benign and malignant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total number of 80 cases have been analyzed. Operative time, estimated blood loss, hospital stay, complications, conversion rates have been retrospectively studied in all cases. Nodal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Puntambekar, Shailesh P., Kathya, Nallapothula, Mallireddy, Chaitanya, Puntambekar, Seema S., Agarwal, Geetanjali, Joshi, Saurabh, Kenawadekar, Rahul, Lawande, Akhil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3996738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24761082
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.129957
_version_ 1782313086848335872
author Puntambekar, Shailesh P.
Kathya, Nallapothula
Mallireddy, Chaitanya
Puntambekar, Seema S.
Agarwal, Geetanjali
Joshi, Saurabh
Kenawadekar, Rahul
Lawande, Akhil
author_facet Puntambekar, Shailesh P.
Kathya, Nallapothula
Mallireddy, Chaitanya
Puntambekar, Seema S.
Agarwal, Geetanjali
Joshi, Saurabh
Kenawadekar, Rahul
Lawande, Akhil
author_sort Puntambekar, Shailesh P.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To study the role of robotics in various gynaecological cases, benign and malignant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total number of 80 cases have been analyzed. Operative time, estimated blood loss, hospital stay, complications, conversion rates have been retrospectively studied in all cases. Nodal yield, vaginal margin and paracervical clearance have been studied in all malignant cases. This investigation was conducted at a single minimal access surgery institute. RESULTS: Of total 80 cases, 29 were benign and 51 were malignant cases. In benign cases, total robotic hysterectomies were 24, 2 cases of tubotuboplasty, 1 case of endometriotic cyst excision, 1 case of metroplasty and 1 case of rectovaginal fistula. In 51 cases, 37 of radical hysterectomy, 9 exenterations and 6 were parametrectomy. In benign cases, mean operative time was 80 min, estimated blood loss was 20 ml, mean hospital stay was for 1 day, no major complications and no conversions. In malignant cases, mean operative time was 122 min, estimated blood loss was 50-100ml, 2 cases of ureteric fistulas and no conversions, nodal yield was 30, vaginal margin was 2.5-3.8 cm and para cervical clearance was 3-3.5 cm. CONCLUSIONS: Ours is the largest series of robotic surgery in gynecological procedures in India. Benign and malignant cases were addressed robotically showing the feasibility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3996738
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39967382014-04-23 Indian Experience of Robotics in Gynecology Puntambekar, Shailesh P. Kathya, Nallapothula Mallireddy, Chaitanya Puntambekar, Seema S. Agarwal, Geetanjali Joshi, Saurabh Kenawadekar, Rahul Lawande, Akhil J Minim Access Surg Original Article AIMS: To study the role of robotics in various gynaecological cases, benign and malignant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total number of 80 cases have been analyzed. Operative time, estimated blood loss, hospital stay, complications, conversion rates have been retrospectively studied in all cases. Nodal yield, vaginal margin and paracervical clearance have been studied in all malignant cases. This investigation was conducted at a single minimal access surgery institute. RESULTS: Of total 80 cases, 29 were benign and 51 were malignant cases. In benign cases, total robotic hysterectomies were 24, 2 cases of tubotuboplasty, 1 case of endometriotic cyst excision, 1 case of metroplasty and 1 case of rectovaginal fistula. In 51 cases, 37 of radical hysterectomy, 9 exenterations and 6 were parametrectomy. In benign cases, mean operative time was 80 min, estimated blood loss was 20 ml, mean hospital stay was for 1 day, no major complications and no conversions. In malignant cases, mean operative time was 122 min, estimated blood loss was 50-100ml, 2 cases of ureteric fistulas and no conversions, nodal yield was 30, vaginal margin was 2.5-3.8 cm and para cervical clearance was 3-3.5 cm. CONCLUSIONS: Ours is the largest series of robotic surgery in gynecological procedures in India. Benign and malignant cases were addressed robotically showing the feasibility. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC3996738/ /pubmed/24761082 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.129957 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Minimal Access Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Puntambekar, Shailesh P.
Kathya, Nallapothula
Mallireddy, Chaitanya
Puntambekar, Seema S.
Agarwal, Geetanjali
Joshi, Saurabh
Kenawadekar, Rahul
Lawande, Akhil
Indian Experience of Robotics in Gynecology
title Indian Experience of Robotics in Gynecology
title_full Indian Experience of Robotics in Gynecology
title_fullStr Indian Experience of Robotics in Gynecology
title_full_unstemmed Indian Experience of Robotics in Gynecology
title_short Indian Experience of Robotics in Gynecology
title_sort indian experience of robotics in gynecology
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3996738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24761082
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.129957
work_keys_str_mv AT puntambekarshaileshp indianexperienceofroboticsingynecology
AT kathyanallapothula indianexperienceofroboticsingynecology
AT mallireddychaitanya indianexperienceofroboticsingynecology
AT puntambekarseemas indianexperienceofroboticsingynecology
AT agarwalgeetanjali indianexperienceofroboticsingynecology
AT joshisaurabh indianexperienceofroboticsingynecology
AT kenawadekarrahul indianexperienceofroboticsingynecology
AT lawandeakhil indianexperienceofroboticsingynecology