Cargando…
Indian Experience of Robotics in Gynecology
AIMS: To study the role of robotics in various gynaecological cases, benign and malignant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total number of 80 cases have been analyzed. Operative time, estimated blood loss, hospital stay, complications, conversion rates have been retrospectively studied in all cases. Nodal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3996738/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24761082 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.129957 |
_version_ | 1782313086848335872 |
---|---|
author | Puntambekar, Shailesh P. Kathya, Nallapothula Mallireddy, Chaitanya Puntambekar, Seema S. Agarwal, Geetanjali Joshi, Saurabh Kenawadekar, Rahul Lawande, Akhil |
author_facet | Puntambekar, Shailesh P. Kathya, Nallapothula Mallireddy, Chaitanya Puntambekar, Seema S. Agarwal, Geetanjali Joshi, Saurabh Kenawadekar, Rahul Lawande, Akhil |
author_sort | Puntambekar, Shailesh P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: To study the role of robotics in various gynaecological cases, benign and malignant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total number of 80 cases have been analyzed. Operative time, estimated blood loss, hospital stay, complications, conversion rates have been retrospectively studied in all cases. Nodal yield, vaginal margin and paracervical clearance have been studied in all malignant cases. This investigation was conducted at a single minimal access surgery institute. RESULTS: Of total 80 cases, 29 were benign and 51 were malignant cases. In benign cases, total robotic hysterectomies were 24, 2 cases of tubotuboplasty, 1 case of endometriotic cyst excision, 1 case of metroplasty and 1 case of rectovaginal fistula. In 51 cases, 37 of radical hysterectomy, 9 exenterations and 6 were parametrectomy. In benign cases, mean operative time was 80 min, estimated blood loss was 20 ml, mean hospital stay was for 1 day, no major complications and no conversions. In malignant cases, mean operative time was 122 min, estimated blood loss was 50-100ml, 2 cases of ureteric fistulas and no conversions, nodal yield was 30, vaginal margin was 2.5-3.8 cm and para cervical clearance was 3-3.5 cm. CONCLUSIONS: Ours is the largest series of robotic surgery in gynecological procedures in India. Benign and malignant cases were addressed robotically showing the feasibility. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3996738 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39967382014-04-23 Indian Experience of Robotics in Gynecology Puntambekar, Shailesh P. Kathya, Nallapothula Mallireddy, Chaitanya Puntambekar, Seema S. Agarwal, Geetanjali Joshi, Saurabh Kenawadekar, Rahul Lawande, Akhil J Minim Access Surg Original Article AIMS: To study the role of robotics in various gynaecological cases, benign and malignant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total number of 80 cases have been analyzed. Operative time, estimated blood loss, hospital stay, complications, conversion rates have been retrospectively studied in all cases. Nodal yield, vaginal margin and paracervical clearance have been studied in all malignant cases. This investigation was conducted at a single minimal access surgery institute. RESULTS: Of total 80 cases, 29 were benign and 51 were malignant cases. In benign cases, total robotic hysterectomies were 24, 2 cases of tubotuboplasty, 1 case of endometriotic cyst excision, 1 case of metroplasty and 1 case of rectovaginal fistula. In 51 cases, 37 of radical hysterectomy, 9 exenterations and 6 were parametrectomy. In benign cases, mean operative time was 80 min, estimated blood loss was 20 ml, mean hospital stay was for 1 day, no major complications and no conversions. In malignant cases, mean operative time was 122 min, estimated blood loss was 50-100ml, 2 cases of ureteric fistulas and no conversions, nodal yield was 30, vaginal margin was 2.5-3.8 cm and para cervical clearance was 3-3.5 cm. CONCLUSIONS: Ours is the largest series of robotic surgery in gynecological procedures in India. Benign and malignant cases were addressed robotically showing the feasibility. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC3996738/ /pubmed/24761082 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.129957 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Minimal Access Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Puntambekar, Shailesh P. Kathya, Nallapothula Mallireddy, Chaitanya Puntambekar, Seema S. Agarwal, Geetanjali Joshi, Saurabh Kenawadekar, Rahul Lawande, Akhil Indian Experience of Robotics in Gynecology |
title | Indian Experience of Robotics in Gynecology |
title_full | Indian Experience of Robotics in Gynecology |
title_fullStr | Indian Experience of Robotics in Gynecology |
title_full_unstemmed | Indian Experience of Robotics in Gynecology |
title_short | Indian Experience of Robotics in Gynecology |
title_sort | indian experience of robotics in gynecology |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3996738/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24761082 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.129957 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT puntambekarshaileshp indianexperienceofroboticsingynecology AT kathyanallapothula indianexperienceofroboticsingynecology AT mallireddychaitanya indianexperienceofroboticsingynecology AT puntambekarseemas indianexperienceofroboticsingynecology AT agarwalgeetanjali indianexperienceofroboticsingynecology AT joshisaurabh indianexperienceofroboticsingynecology AT kenawadekarrahul indianexperienceofroboticsingynecology AT lawandeakhil indianexperienceofroboticsingynecology |