Cargando…

The effect of 30% ethanolic extract of Indian propolis on replica of human dentin compared against commercially available desensitizing agent: A methodological SEM study in vitro

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the ability of 30% ethanolic extract of Indian propolis on dentinal tubule occlusion comparatively against CPP-ACP containing desensitizing agent GC tooth mousse. METHODOLOGY: The specimens were prepared from 30 freshly extracted sound human third molars stored in 10%...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hongal, Sudhir, Torwane, Nilesh Arjun, Goel, Pankaj, Chandrashekar, Byarakele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3996746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24761114
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8490.129026
_version_ 1782313088657129472
author Hongal, Sudhir
Torwane, Nilesh Arjun
Goel, Pankaj
Chandrashekar, Byarakele
author_facet Hongal, Sudhir
Torwane, Nilesh Arjun
Goel, Pankaj
Chandrashekar, Byarakele
author_sort Hongal, Sudhir
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the ability of 30% ethanolic extract of Indian propolis on dentinal tubule occlusion comparatively against CPP-ACP containing desensitizing agent GC tooth mousse. METHODOLOGY: The specimens were prepared from 30 freshly extracted sound human third molars stored in 10% formalin (pH 7.0) at a room temperature. From each specimen, a sectioned sample (5 mm length × 5 mm width × 3.5 mm depth) was obtained including the cervical area. Samples were smoothened and wet-polished with 1000- and 1200-grit aluminum oxide abrasive paper and diamond pastes, in order to stimulate the clinical aspect of hypersensitive dentin cervical surfaces. All the specimens were randomly assigned to three groups (n = 10), according to dentin surface treatments. Negative control: Untreated specimens (n = 4) and pretreated with 6% citric acid (n = 6); Test Group: 30% ethanolic extract of Indian propolis (n = 10); Positive Group: GC Tooth Mousse (n =10). All the specimens were prepared for SEM analysis. RESULTS: GC tooth mousse promoted tubule occlusion by crystal-like deposits in the lumen of the tubules. While propolis created a thin, smooth layer over dentin surface. CONCLUSION: According to the SEM analysis, both desensitizing agent were able to occlude the dentinal tubules.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3996746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39967462014-04-23 The effect of 30% ethanolic extract of Indian propolis on replica of human dentin compared against commercially available desensitizing agent: A methodological SEM study in vitro Hongal, Sudhir Torwane, Nilesh Arjun Goel, Pankaj Chandrashekar, Byarakele Pharmacognosy Res Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the ability of 30% ethanolic extract of Indian propolis on dentinal tubule occlusion comparatively against CPP-ACP containing desensitizing agent GC tooth mousse. METHODOLOGY: The specimens were prepared from 30 freshly extracted sound human third molars stored in 10% formalin (pH 7.0) at a room temperature. From each specimen, a sectioned sample (5 mm length × 5 mm width × 3.5 mm depth) was obtained including the cervical area. Samples were smoothened and wet-polished with 1000- and 1200-grit aluminum oxide abrasive paper and diamond pastes, in order to stimulate the clinical aspect of hypersensitive dentin cervical surfaces. All the specimens were randomly assigned to three groups (n = 10), according to dentin surface treatments. Negative control: Untreated specimens (n = 4) and pretreated with 6% citric acid (n = 6); Test Group: 30% ethanolic extract of Indian propolis (n = 10); Positive Group: GC Tooth Mousse (n =10). All the specimens were prepared for SEM analysis. RESULTS: GC tooth mousse promoted tubule occlusion by crystal-like deposits in the lumen of the tubules. While propolis created a thin, smooth layer over dentin surface. CONCLUSION: According to the SEM analysis, both desensitizing agent were able to occlude the dentinal tubules. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC3996746/ /pubmed/24761114 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8490.129026 Text en Copyright: © Pharmacognosy Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hongal, Sudhir
Torwane, Nilesh Arjun
Goel, Pankaj
Chandrashekar, Byarakele
The effect of 30% ethanolic extract of Indian propolis on replica of human dentin compared against commercially available desensitizing agent: A methodological SEM study in vitro
title The effect of 30% ethanolic extract of Indian propolis on replica of human dentin compared against commercially available desensitizing agent: A methodological SEM study in vitro
title_full The effect of 30% ethanolic extract of Indian propolis on replica of human dentin compared against commercially available desensitizing agent: A methodological SEM study in vitro
title_fullStr The effect of 30% ethanolic extract of Indian propolis on replica of human dentin compared against commercially available desensitizing agent: A methodological SEM study in vitro
title_full_unstemmed The effect of 30% ethanolic extract of Indian propolis on replica of human dentin compared against commercially available desensitizing agent: A methodological SEM study in vitro
title_short The effect of 30% ethanolic extract of Indian propolis on replica of human dentin compared against commercially available desensitizing agent: A methodological SEM study in vitro
title_sort effect of 30% ethanolic extract of indian propolis on replica of human dentin compared against commercially available desensitizing agent: a methodological sem study in vitro
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3996746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24761114
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8490.129026
work_keys_str_mv AT hongalsudhir theeffectof30ethanolicextractofindianpropolisonreplicaofhumandentincomparedagainstcommerciallyavailabledesensitizingagentamethodologicalsemstudyinvitro
AT torwanenilesharjun theeffectof30ethanolicextractofindianpropolisonreplicaofhumandentincomparedagainstcommerciallyavailabledesensitizingagentamethodologicalsemstudyinvitro
AT goelpankaj theeffectof30ethanolicextractofindianpropolisonreplicaofhumandentincomparedagainstcommerciallyavailabledesensitizingagentamethodologicalsemstudyinvitro
AT chandrashekarbyarakele theeffectof30ethanolicextractofindianpropolisonreplicaofhumandentincomparedagainstcommerciallyavailabledesensitizingagentamethodologicalsemstudyinvitro
AT hongalsudhir effectof30ethanolicextractofindianpropolisonreplicaofhumandentincomparedagainstcommerciallyavailabledesensitizingagentamethodologicalsemstudyinvitro
AT torwanenilesharjun effectof30ethanolicextractofindianpropolisonreplicaofhumandentincomparedagainstcommerciallyavailabledesensitizingagentamethodologicalsemstudyinvitro
AT goelpankaj effectof30ethanolicextractofindianpropolisonreplicaofhumandentincomparedagainstcommerciallyavailabledesensitizingagentamethodologicalsemstudyinvitro
AT chandrashekarbyarakele effectof30ethanolicextractofindianpropolisonreplicaofhumandentincomparedagainstcommerciallyavailabledesensitizingagentamethodologicalsemstudyinvitro