Cargando…
The effect of 30% ethanolic extract of Indian propolis on replica of human dentin compared against commercially available desensitizing agent: A methodological SEM study in vitro
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the ability of 30% ethanolic extract of Indian propolis on dentinal tubule occlusion comparatively against CPP-ACP containing desensitizing agent GC tooth mousse. METHODOLOGY: The specimens were prepared from 30 freshly extracted sound human third molars stored in 10%...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3996746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24761114 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8490.129026 |
_version_ | 1782313088657129472 |
---|---|
author | Hongal, Sudhir Torwane, Nilesh Arjun Goel, Pankaj Chandrashekar, Byarakele |
author_facet | Hongal, Sudhir Torwane, Nilesh Arjun Goel, Pankaj Chandrashekar, Byarakele |
author_sort | Hongal, Sudhir |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the ability of 30% ethanolic extract of Indian propolis on dentinal tubule occlusion comparatively against CPP-ACP containing desensitizing agent GC tooth mousse. METHODOLOGY: The specimens were prepared from 30 freshly extracted sound human third molars stored in 10% formalin (pH 7.0) at a room temperature. From each specimen, a sectioned sample (5 mm length × 5 mm width × 3.5 mm depth) was obtained including the cervical area. Samples were smoothened and wet-polished with 1000- and 1200-grit aluminum oxide abrasive paper and diamond pastes, in order to stimulate the clinical aspect of hypersensitive dentin cervical surfaces. All the specimens were randomly assigned to three groups (n = 10), according to dentin surface treatments. Negative control: Untreated specimens (n = 4) and pretreated with 6% citric acid (n = 6); Test Group: 30% ethanolic extract of Indian propolis (n = 10); Positive Group: GC Tooth Mousse (n =10). All the specimens were prepared for SEM analysis. RESULTS: GC tooth mousse promoted tubule occlusion by crystal-like deposits in the lumen of the tubules. While propolis created a thin, smooth layer over dentin surface. CONCLUSION: According to the SEM analysis, both desensitizing agent were able to occlude the dentinal tubules. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3996746 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39967462014-04-23 The effect of 30% ethanolic extract of Indian propolis on replica of human dentin compared against commercially available desensitizing agent: A methodological SEM study in vitro Hongal, Sudhir Torwane, Nilesh Arjun Goel, Pankaj Chandrashekar, Byarakele Pharmacognosy Res Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the ability of 30% ethanolic extract of Indian propolis on dentinal tubule occlusion comparatively against CPP-ACP containing desensitizing agent GC tooth mousse. METHODOLOGY: The specimens were prepared from 30 freshly extracted sound human third molars stored in 10% formalin (pH 7.0) at a room temperature. From each specimen, a sectioned sample (5 mm length × 5 mm width × 3.5 mm depth) was obtained including the cervical area. Samples were smoothened and wet-polished with 1000- and 1200-grit aluminum oxide abrasive paper and diamond pastes, in order to stimulate the clinical aspect of hypersensitive dentin cervical surfaces. All the specimens were randomly assigned to three groups (n = 10), according to dentin surface treatments. Negative control: Untreated specimens (n = 4) and pretreated with 6% citric acid (n = 6); Test Group: 30% ethanolic extract of Indian propolis (n = 10); Positive Group: GC Tooth Mousse (n =10). All the specimens were prepared for SEM analysis. RESULTS: GC tooth mousse promoted tubule occlusion by crystal-like deposits in the lumen of the tubules. While propolis created a thin, smooth layer over dentin surface. CONCLUSION: According to the SEM analysis, both desensitizing agent were able to occlude the dentinal tubules. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC3996746/ /pubmed/24761114 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8490.129026 Text en Copyright: © Pharmacognosy Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hongal, Sudhir Torwane, Nilesh Arjun Goel, Pankaj Chandrashekar, Byarakele The effect of 30% ethanolic extract of Indian propolis on replica of human dentin compared against commercially available desensitizing agent: A methodological SEM study in vitro |
title | The effect of 30% ethanolic extract of Indian propolis on replica of human dentin compared against commercially available desensitizing agent: A methodological SEM study in vitro |
title_full | The effect of 30% ethanolic extract of Indian propolis on replica of human dentin compared against commercially available desensitizing agent: A methodological SEM study in vitro |
title_fullStr | The effect of 30% ethanolic extract of Indian propolis on replica of human dentin compared against commercially available desensitizing agent: A methodological SEM study in vitro |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of 30% ethanolic extract of Indian propolis on replica of human dentin compared against commercially available desensitizing agent: A methodological SEM study in vitro |
title_short | The effect of 30% ethanolic extract of Indian propolis on replica of human dentin compared against commercially available desensitizing agent: A methodological SEM study in vitro |
title_sort | effect of 30% ethanolic extract of indian propolis on replica of human dentin compared against commercially available desensitizing agent: a methodological sem study in vitro |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3996746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24761114 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8490.129026 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hongalsudhir theeffectof30ethanolicextractofindianpropolisonreplicaofhumandentincomparedagainstcommerciallyavailabledesensitizingagentamethodologicalsemstudyinvitro AT torwanenilesharjun theeffectof30ethanolicextractofindianpropolisonreplicaofhumandentincomparedagainstcommerciallyavailabledesensitizingagentamethodologicalsemstudyinvitro AT goelpankaj theeffectof30ethanolicextractofindianpropolisonreplicaofhumandentincomparedagainstcommerciallyavailabledesensitizingagentamethodologicalsemstudyinvitro AT chandrashekarbyarakele theeffectof30ethanolicextractofindianpropolisonreplicaofhumandentincomparedagainstcommerciallyavailabledesensitizingagentamethodologicalsemstudyinvitro AT hongalsudhir effectof30ethanolicextractofindianpropolisonreplicaofhumandentincomparedagainstcommerciallyavailabledesensitizingagentamethodologicalsemstudyinvitro AT torwanenilesharjun effectof30ethanolicextractofindianpropolisonreplicaofhumandentincomparedagainstcommerciallyavailabledesensitizingagentamethodologicalsemstudyinvitro AT goelpankaj effectof30ethanolicextractofindianpropolisonreplicaofhumandentincomparedagainstcommerciallyavailabledesensitizingagentamethodologicalsemstudyinvitro AT chandrashekarbyarakele effectof30ethanolicextractofindianpropolisonreplicaofhumandentincomparedagainstcommerciallyavailabledesensitizingagentamethodologicalsemstudyinvitro |