Cargando…

FLT PET-CT in evaluation of treatment response

PURPOSE: Review published studies to investigate the value of clinical 3-deoxy-3-(18)F-fluorothymidine (FLT) positron emission tomography (PET) in predicting response to treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Interrogate databases to identify suitable publications between 2007 and 2013 with a minimum of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sanghera, Bal, Wong, Wai Lup, Sonoda, Luke I, Beynon, Gwen, Makris, Andreas, Woolf, David, Ardeshna, Kirit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3996774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24761056
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-3919.130274
_version_ 1782313094310002688
author Sanghera, Bal
Wong, Wai Lup
Sonoda, Luke I
Beynon, Gwen
Makris, Andreas
Woolf, David
Ardeshna, Kirit
author_facet Sanghera, Bal
Wong, Wai Lup
Sonoda, Luke I
Beynon, Gwen
Makris, Andreas
Woolf, David
Ardeshna, Kirit
author_sort Sanghera, Bal
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Review published studies to investigate the value of clinical 3-deoxy-3-(18)F-fluorothymidine (FLT) positron emission tomography (PET) in predicting response to treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Interrogate databases to identify suitable publications between 2007 and 2013 with a minimum of five patients. Articles within the inclusion criteria were reviewed with major findings reported leading to a descriptive analysis of FLT PET in therapy response. RESULTS: Lesions investigated included glioma, head and neck, esophageal, lung, breast, gastric, renal, rectal, sarcomas, germ cell, lymphomas, leukemia, and melanoma resulting in a total of 34 studies analyzed. A variety of therapies were applied and dissimilar PET protocols were widespread making direct comparison between studies challenging. Though baseline, early and late therapy scans were popular particularly in chemotherapy regimes. Most studies investigated showed significantly reduced FLT uptake during or after therapy compared with pretreatment scans. CONCLUSION: Current evidence suggests FLT PET has a positive role to play in predicting therapy response especially in brain, lung, and breast cancers where good correlation with Ki-67 is observed. However, careful attention must be placed in undertaking larger clinical trials where harmonization of scanning and analysis protocols are strictly adhered to fully assess the true potential of FLT PET in predicting response to treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3996774
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39967742014-04-23 FLT PET-CT in evaluation of treatment response Sanghera, Bal Wong, Wai Lup Sonoda, Luke I Beynon, Gwen Makris, Andreas Woolf, David Ardeshna, Kirit Indian J Nucl Med Review Article PURPOSE: Review published studies to investigate the value of clinical 3-deoxy-3-(18)F-fluorothymidine (FLT) positron emission tomography (PET) in predicting response to treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Interrogate databases to identify suitable publications between 2007 and 2013 with a minimum of five patients. Articles within the inclusion criteria were reviewed with major findings reported leading to a descriptive analysis of FLT PET in therapy response. RESULTS: Lesions investigated included glioma, head and neck, esophageal, lung, breast, gastric, renal, rectal, sarcomas, germ cell, lymphomas, leukemia, and melanoma resulting in a total of 34 studies analyzed. A variety of therapies were applied and dissimilar PET protocols were widespread making direct comparison between studies challenging. Though baseline, early and late therapy scans were popular particularly in chemotherapy regimes. Most studies investigated showed significantly reduced FLT uptake during or after therapy compared with pretreatment scans. CONCLUSION: Current evidence suggests FLT PET has a positive role to play in predicting therapy response especially in brain, lung, and breast cancers where good correlation with Ki-67 is observed. However, careful attention must be placed in undertaking larger clinical trials where harmonization of scanning and analysis protocols are strictly adhered to fully assess the true potential of FLT PET in predicting response to treatment. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC3996774/ /pubmed/24761056 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-3919.130274 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Sanghera, Bal
Wong, Wai Lup
Sonoda, Luke I
Beynon, Gwen
Makris, Andreas
Woolf, David
Ardeshna, Kirit
FLT PET-CT in evaluation of treatment response
title FLT PET-CT in evaluation of treatment response
title_full FLT PET-CT in evaluation of treatment response
title_fullStr FLT PET-CT in evaluation of treatment response
title_full_unstemmed FLT PET-CT in evaluation of treatment response
title_short FLT PET-CT in evaluation of treatment response
title_sort flt pet-ct in evaluation of treatment response
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3996774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24761056
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-3919.130274
work_keys_str_mv AT sangherabal fltpetctinevaluationoftreatmentresponse
AT wongwailup fltpetctinevaluationoftreatmentresponse
AT sonodalukei fltpetctinevaluationoftreatmentresponse
AT beynongwen fltpetctinevaluationoftreatmentresponse
AT makrisandreas fltpetctinevaluationoftreatmentresponse
AT woolfdavid fltpetctinevaluationoftreatmentresponse
AT ardeshnakirit fltpetctinevaluationoftreatmentresponse