Cargando…

A community-based approach to indigent selection is difficult to organize in a formal neighbourhood in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso: a mixed methods exploratory study

BACKGROUND: In most African countries, indigents treated at public health centres are supposed to be exempted from user fees. In Africa, most of the available knowledge has to do with targeting processes in rural areas, and little is known about how to select the worst-off in an urban area. In rural...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ridde, Valéry, Rossier, Clémentine, Soura, Abdramane B, Bazié, Fiacre, Kadio, Kadidiatou
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3996853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24739441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-13-31
_version_ 1782313105473142784
author Ridde, Valéry
Rossier, Clémentine
Soura, Abdramane B
Bazié, Fiacre
Kadio, Kadidiatou
author_facet Ridde, Valéry
Rossier, Clémentine
Soura, Abdramane B
Bazié, Fiacre
Kadio, Kadidiatou
author_sort Ridde, Valéry
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In most African countries, indigents treated at public health centres are supposed to be exempted from user fees. In Africa, most of the available knowledge has to do with targeting processes in rural areas, and little is known about how to select the worst-off in an urban area. In rural communities of Burkina Faso, trials of participatory community-based selection of indigents have been effective. However, the process for selecting indigents in urban areas is not yet clear. METHODS: This study evaluates a community-funded participatory indigent selection process in both a formal (loti) and an informal (non-loti) neighbourhood in the urban setting of Burkina Faso’s capital. This was an exploratory study to evaluate the processes and effectiveness of participatory targeting. We conducted individual interviews (n = 26) and analyzed secondary qualitative data (eight focus groups, 16 individual interviews). We also used the results of a socioeconomic survey (carried out by the Ouaga HDSS in 2011) of all the households established in the areas, including those of selected indigents. RESULTS: The coverage of indigent targeting was very low: 0.33% (loti) and 0.22% (non loti). In the non loti neighbourhood, the level of poverty among people selected was higher than the mean level of the poor who were not selected. Some indigents selected in the loti neighbourhood were not among the worst-off. The process was difficult to organize in the loti neighbourhood; people knew each other less well and were not very available, and there were cases of collusion. The process worked well in the non loti neighbourhood. CONCLUSIONS: This intervention research provides new evidence about the feasibility of a community-based selection process in an urban setting in Africa by comparing two different urban settings. The participatory community-based selection process appeared to be suitable for the non loti neighbourhood, but other targeting strategies need to be found for loti areas. Specific budgets need to be allocated to increase the coverage of indigent targeting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3996853
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39968532014-04-24 A community-based approach to indigent selection is difficult to organize in a formal neighbourhood in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso: a mixed methods exploratory study Ridde, Valéry Rossier, Clémentine Soura, Abdramane B Bazié, Fiacre Kadio, Kadidiatou Int J Equity Health Research BACKGROUND: In most African countries, indigents treated at public health centres are supposed to be exempted from user fees. In Africa, most of the available knowledge has to do with targeting processes in rural areas, and little is known about how to select the worst-off in an urban area. In rural communities of Burkina Faso, trials of participatory community-based selection of indigents have been effective. However, the process for selecting indigents in urban areas is not yet clear. METHODS: This study evaluates a community-funded participatory indigent selection process in both a formal (loti) and an informal (non-loti) neighbourhood in the urban setting of Burkina Faso’s capital. This was an exploratory study to evaluate the processes and effectiveness of participatory targeting. We conducted individual interviews (n = 26) and analyzed secondary qualitative data (eight focus groups, 16 individual interviews). We also used the results of a socioeconomic survey (carried out by the Ouaga HDSS in 2011) of all the households established in the areas, including those of selected indigents. RESULTS: The coverage of indigent targeting was very low: 0.33% (loti) and 0.22% (non loti). In the non loti neighbourhood, the level of poverty among people selected was higher than the mean level of the poor who were not selected. Some indigents selected in the loti neighbourhood were not among the worst-off. The process was difficult to organize in the loti neighbourhood; people knew each other less well and were not very available, and there were cases of collusion. The process worked well in the non loti neighbourhood. CONCLUSIONS: This intervention research provides new evidence about the feasibility of a community-based selection process in an urban setting in Africa by comparing two different urban settings. The participatory community-based selection process appeared to be suitable for the non loti neighbourhood, but other targeting strategies need to be found for loti areas. Specific budgets need to be allocated to increase the coverage of indigent targeting. BioMed Central 2014-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3996853/ /pubmed/24739441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-13-31 Text en Copyright © 2014 Ridde et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Ridde, Valéry
Rossier, Clémentine
Soura, Abdramane B
Bazié, Fiacre
Kadio, Kadidiatou
A community-based approach to indigent selection is difficult to organize in a formal neighbourhood in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso: a mixed methods exploratory study
title A community-based approach to indigent selection is difficult to organize in a formal neighbourhood in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso: a mixed methods exploratory study
title_full A community-based approach to indigent selection is difficult to organize in a formal neighbourhood in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso: a mixed methods exploratory study
title_fullStr A community-based approach to indigent selection is difficult to organize in a formal neighbourhood in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso: a mixed methods exploratory study
title_full_unstemmed A community-based approach to indigent selection is difficult to organize in a formal neighbourhood in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso: a mixed methods exploratory study
title_short A community-based approach to indigent selection is difficult to organize in a formal neighbourhood in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso: a mixed methods exploratory study
title_sort community-based approach to indigent selection is difficult to organize in a formal neighbourhood in ouagadougou, burkina faso: a mixed methods exploratory study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3996853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24739441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-13-31
work_keys_str_mv AT riddevalery acommunitybasedapproachtoindigentselectionisdifficulttoorganizeinaformalneighbourhoodinouagadougouburkinafasoamixedmethodsexploratorystudy
AT rossierclementine acommunitybasedapproachtoindigentselectionisdifficulttoorganizeinaformalneighbourhoodinouagadougouburkinafasoamixedmethodsexploratorystudy
AT souraabdramaneb acommunitybasedapproachtoindigentselectionisdifficulttoorganizeinaformalneighbourhoodinouagadougouburkinafasoamixedmethodsexploratorystudy
AT baziefiacre acommunitybasedapproachtoindigentselectionisdifficulttoorganizeinaformalneighbourhoodinouagadougouburkinafasoamixedmethodsexploratorystudy
AT kadiokadidiatou acommunitybasedapproachtoindigentselectionisdifficulttoorganizeinaformalneighbourhoodinouagadougouburkinafasoamixedmethodsexploratorystudy
AT riddevalery communitybasedapproachtoindigentselectionisdifficulttoorganizeinaformalneighbourhoodinouagadougouburkinafasoamixedmethodsexploratorystudy
AT rossierclementine communitybasedapproachtoindigentselectionisdifficulttoorganizeinaformalneighbourhoodinouagadougouburkinafasoamixedmethodsexploratorystudy
AT souraabdramaneb communitybasedapproachtoindigentselectionisdifficulttoorganizeinaformalneighbourhoodinouagadougouburkinafasoamixedmethodsexploratorystudy
AT baziefiacre communitybasedapproachtoindigentselectionisdifficulttoorganizeinaformalneighbourhoodinouagadougouburkinafasoamixedmethodsexploratorystudy
AT kadiokadidiatou communitybasedapproachtoindigentselectionisdifficulttoorganizeinaformalneighbourhoodinouagadougouburkinafasoamixedmethodsexploratorystudy