Cargando…

How to get the most from microarray data: advice from reverse genomics

BACKGROUND: Whole-genome profiling of gene expression is a powerful tool for identifying cancer-associated genes. Genes differentially expressed between normal and tumorous tissues are usually considered to be cancer associated. We recently demonstrated that the analysis of interindividual variation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gorlov, Ivan P, Yang, Ji-Yeon, Byun, Jinyoung, Logothetis, Christopher, Gorlova, Olga Y, Do, Kim-Anh, Amos, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3997969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24656147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-223
_version_ 1782313271950311424
author Gorlov, Ivan P
Yang, Ji-Yeon
Byun, Jinyoung
Logothetis, Christopher
Gorlova, Olga Y
Do, Kim-Anh
Amos, Christopher
author_facet Gorlov, Ivan P
Yang, Ji-Yeon
Byun, Jinyoung
Logothetis, Christopher
Gorlova, Olga Y
Do, Kim-Anh
Amos, Christopher
author_sort Gorlov, Ivan P
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Whole-genome profiling of gene expression is a powerful tool for identifying cancer-associated genes. Genes differentially expressed between normal and tumorous tissues are usually considered to be cancer associated. We recently demonstrated that the analysis of interindividual variation in gene expression can be useful for identifying cancer associated genes. The goal of this study was to identify the best microarray data–derived predictor of known cancer associated genes. RESULTS: We found that the traditional approach of identifying cancer genes—identifying differentially expressed genes—is not very efficient. The analysis of interindividual variation of gene expression in tumor samples identifies cancer-associated genes more effectively. The results were consistent across 4 major types of cancer: breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate. We used recently reported cancer-associated genes (2011–2012) for validation and found that novel cancer-associated genes can be best identified by elevated variance of the gene expression in tumor samples. CONCLUSIONS: The observation that the high interindividual variation of gene expression in tumor tissues is the best predictor of cancer-associated genes is likely a result of tumor heterogeneity on gene level. Computer simulation demonstrates that in the case of heterogeneity, an assessment of variance in tumors provides a better identification of cancer genes than does the comparison of the expression in normal and tumor tissues. Our results thus challenge the current paradigm that comparing the mean expression between normal and tumorous tissues is the best approach to identifying cancer-associated genes; we found that the high interindividual variation in expression is a better approach, and that using variation would improve our chances of identifying cancer-associated genes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3997969
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39979692014-05-08 How to get the most from microarray data: advice from reverse genomics Gorlov, Ivan P Yang, Ji-Yeon Byun, Jinyoung Logothetis, Christopher Gorlova, Olga Y Do, Kim-Anh Amos, Christopher BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Whole-genome profiling of gene expression is a powerful tool for identifying cancer-associated genes. Genes differentially expressed between normal and tumorous tissues are usually considered to be cancer associated. We recently demonstrated that the analysis of interindividual variation in gene expression can be useful for identifying cancer associated genes. The goal of this study was to identify the best microarray data–derived predictor of known cancer associated genes. RESULTS: We found that the traditional approach of identifying cancer genes—identifying differentially expressed genes—is not very efficient. The analysis of interindividual variation of gene expression in tumor samples identifies cancer-associated genes more effectively. The results were consistent across 4 major types of cancer: breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate. We used recently reported cancer-associated genes (2011–2012) for validation and found that novel cancer-associated genes can be best identified by elevated variance of the gene expression in tumor samples. CONCLUSIONS: The observation that the high interindividual variation of gene expression in tumor tissues is the best predictor of cancer-associated genes is likely a result of tumor heterogeneity on gene level. Computer simulation demonstrates that in the case of heterogeneity, an assessment of variance in tumors provides a better identification of cancer genes than does the comparison of the expression in normal and tumor tissues. Our results thus challenge the current paradigm that comparing the mean expression between normal and tumorous tissues is the best approach to identifying cancer-associated genes; we found that the high interindividual variation in expression is a better approach, and that using variation would improve our chances of identifying cancer-associated genes. BioMed Central 2014-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3997969/ /pubmed/24656147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-223 Text en Copyright © 2014 Gorlov et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gorlov, Ivan P
Yang, Ji-Yeon
Byun, Jinyoung
Logothetis, Christopher
Gorlova, Olga Y
Do, Kim-Anh
Amos, Christopher
How to get the most from microarray data: advice from reverse genomics
title How to get the most from microarray data: advice from reverse genomics
title_full How to get the most from microarray data: advice from reverse genomics
title_fullStr How to get the most from microarray data: advice from reverse genomics
title_full_unstemmed How to get the most from microarray data: advice from reverse genomics
title_short How to get the most from microarray data: advice from reverse genomics
title_sort how to get the most from microarray data: advice from reverse genomics
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3997969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24656147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-223
work_keys_str_mv AT gorlovivanp howtogetthemostfrommicroarraydataadvicefromreversegenomics
AT yangjiyeon howtogetthemostfrommicroarraydataadvicefromreversegenomics
AT byunjinyoung howtogetthemostfrommicroarraydataadvicefromreversegenomics
AT logothetischristopher howtogetthemostfrommicroarraydataadvicefromreversegenomics
AT gorlovaolgay howtogetthemostfrommicroarraydataadvicefromreversegenomics
AT dokimanh howtogetthemostfrommicroarraydataadvicefromreversegenomics
AT amoschristopher howtogetthemostfrommicroarraydataadvicefromreversegenomics