Cargando…
How to get the most from microarray data: advice from reverse genomics
BACKGROUND: Whole-genome profiling of gene expression is a powerful tool for identifying cancer-associated genes. Genes differentially expressed between normal and tumorous tissues are usually considered to be cancer associated. We recently demonstrated that the analysis of interindividual variation...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3997969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24656147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-223 |
_version_ | 1782313271950311424 |
---|---|
author | Gorlov, Ivan P Yang, Ji-Yeon Byun, Jinyoung Logothetis, Christopher Gorlova, Olga Y Do, Kim-Anh Amos, Christopher |
author_facet | Gorlov, Ivan P Yang, Ji-Yeon Byun, Jinyoung Logothetis, Christopher Gorlova, Olga Y Do, Kim-Anh Amos, Christopher |
author_sort | Gorlov, Ivan P |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Whole-genome profiling of gene expression is a powerful tool for identifying cancer-associated genes. Genes differentially expressed between normal and tumorous tissues are usually considered to be cancer associated. We recently demonstrated that the analysis of interindividual variation in gene expression can be useful for identifying cancer associated genes. The goal of this study was to identify the best microarray data–derived predictor of known cancer associated genes. RESULTS: We found that the traditional approach of identifying cancer genes—identifying differentially expressed genes—is not very efficient. The analysis of interindividual variation of gene expression in tumor samples identifies cancer-associated genes more effectively. The results were consistent across 4 major types of cancer: breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate. We used recently reported cancer-associated genes (2011–2012) for validation and found that novel cancer-associated genes can be best identified by elevated variance of the gene expression in tumor samples. CONCLUSIONS: The observation that the high interindividual variation of gene expression in tumor tissues is the best predictor of cancer-associated genes is likely a result of tumor heterogeneity on gene level. Computer simulation demonstrates that in the case of heterogeneity, an assessment of variance in tumors provides a better identification of cancer genes than does the comparison of the expression in normal and tumor tissues. Our results thus challenge the current paradigm that comparing the mean expression between normal and tumorous tissues is the best approach to identifying cancer-associated genes; we found that the high interindividual variation in expression is a better approach, and that using variation would improve our chances of identifying cancer-associated genes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3997969 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39979692014-05-08 How to get the most from microarray data: advice from reverse genomics Gorlov, Ivan P Yang, Ji-Yeon Byun, Jinyoung Logothetis, Christopher Gorlova, Olga Y Do, Kim-Anh Amos, Christopher BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Whole-genome profiling of gene expression is a powerful tool for identifying cancer-associated genes. Genes differentially expressed between normal and tumorous tissues are usually considered to be cancer associated. We recently demonstrated that the analysis of interindividual variation in gene expression can be useful for identifying cancer associated genes. The goal of this study was to identify the best microarray data–derived predictor of known cancer associated genes. RESULTS: We found that the traditional approach of identifying cancer genes—identifying differentially expressed genes—is not very efficient. The analysis of interindividual variation of gene expression in tumor samples identifies cancer-associated genes more effectively. The results were consistent across 4 major types of cancer: breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate. We used recently reported cancer-associated genes (2011–2012) for validation and found that novel cancer-associated genes can be best identified by elevated variance of the gene expression in tumor samples. CONCLUSIONS: The observation that the high interindividual variation of gene expression in tumor tissues is the best predictor of cancer-associated genes is likely a result of tumor heterogeneity on gene level. Computer simulation demonstrates that in the case of heterogeneity, an assessment of variance in tumors provides a better identification of cancer genes than does the comparison of the expression in normal and tumor tissues. Our results thus challenge the current paradigm that comparing the mean expression between normal and tumorous tissues is the best approach to identifying cancer-associated genes; we found that the high interindividual variation in expression is a better approach, and that using variation would improve our chances of identifying cancer-associated genes. BioMed Central 2014-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3997969/ /pubmed/24656147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-223 Text en Copyright © 2014 Gorlov et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gorlov, Ivan P Yang, Ji-Yeon Byun, Jinyoung Logothetis, Christopher Gorlova, Olga Y Do, Kim-Anh Amos, Christopher How to get the most from microarray data: advice from reverse genomics |
title | How to get the most from microarray data: advice from reverse genomics |
title_full | How to get the most from microarray data: advice from reverse genomics |
title_fullStr | How to get the most from microarray data: advice from reverse genomics |
title_full_unstemmed | How to get the most from microarray data: advice from reverse genomics |
title_short | How to get the most from microarray data: advice from reverse genomics |
title_sort | how to get the most from microarray data: advice from reverse genomics |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3997969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24656147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-223 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gorlovivanp howtogetthemostfrommicroarraydataadvicefromreversegenomics AT yangjiyeon howtogetthemostfrommicroarraydataadvicefromreversegenomics AT byunjinyoung howtogetthemostfrommicroarraydataadvicefromreversegenomics AT logothetischristopher howtogetthemostfrommicroarraydataadvicefromreversegenomics AT gorlovaolgay howtogetthemostfrommicroarraydataadvicefromreversegenomics AT dokimanh howtogetthemostfrommicroarraydataadvicefromreversegenomics AT amoschristopher howtogetthemostfrommicroarraydataadvicefromreversegenomics |