Cargando…

A qualitative study of influences on older women’s practitioner choices for back pain care

BACKGROUND: Back pain is an increasingly prevalent health concern amongst Australian women for which a wide range of treatment options are available, offered by biomedical, allied health and complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) providers. Although there is an emerging literature on patterns...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kirby, Emma R, Broom, Alex F, Adams, Jon, Sibbritt, David W, Refshauge, Kathryn M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3998023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24655816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-131
_version_ 1782313283186851840
author Kirby, Emma R
Broom, Alex F
Adams, Jon
Sibbritt, David W
Refshauge, Kathryn M
author_facet Kirby, Emma R
Broom, Alex F
Adams, Jon
Sibbritt, David W
Refshauge, Kathryn M
author_sort Kirby, Emma R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Back pain is an increasingly prevalent health concern amongst Australian women for which a wide range of treatment options are available, offered by biomedical, allied health and complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) providers. Although there is an emerging literature on patterns of provider utilisation, less is known about the reasons why women with back pain select their chosen practitioner. In this paper we explore the influences on back pain sufferers’ decision-making about treatment seeking with practitioners for their most recent episode of back pain. METHODS: Drawing on 50 semi-structured interviews with women aged 60–65 years from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health (ALSWH) who have chronic back pain, we focus on the factors which influence their choice of practitioner. Analysis followed a framework approach to qualitative content analysis, augmented by NVivo 9 qualitative data analysis software. Key themes were identified and tested for rigour through inter-rater reliability and constant comparison. RESULTS: The women identified four predominant influences on their choice of practitioner for back pain: familiarity with treatment or experiences with individual practitioners; recommendations from social networks; geographical proximity of practitioners; and, qualifications and credentials of practitioners. The therapeutic approach or evidence-base of the practices being utilised was not reported by the women as central to their back pain treatment decision making. CONCLUSIONS: Choice of practitioner appears to be unrelated to the therapeutic approaches, treatment practices or the scientific basis of therapeutic practices. Moreover, anecdotal lay reports of effectiveness and the ‘treatment experience’ may be more influential than formal qualifications in guiding women’s choice of practitioner for their back pain. Further work is needed on the interpersonal, collective and subjective underpinnings of practitioner choice, particularly over time, in order to better understand why women utilise certain practitioners for back pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3998023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39980232014-04-25 A qualitative study of influences on older women’s practitioner choices for back pain care Kirby, Emma R Broom, Alex F Adams, Jon Sibbritt, David W Refshauge, Kathryn M BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Back pain is an increasingly prevalent health concern amongst Australian women for which a wide range of treatment options are available, offered by biomedical, allied health and complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) providers. Although there is an emerging literature on patterns of provider utilisation, less is known about the reasons why women with back pain select their chosen practitioner. In this paper we explore the influences on back pain sufferers’ decision-making about treatment seeking with practitioners for their most recent episode of back pain. METHODS: Drawing on 50 semi-structured interviews with women aged 60–65 years from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health (ALSWH) who have chronic back pain, we focus on the factors which influence their choice of practitioner. Analysis followed a framework approach to qualitative content analysis, augmented by NVivo 9 qualitative data analysis software. Key themes were identified and tested for rigour through inter-rater reliability and constant comparison. RESULTS: The women identified four predominant influences on their choice of practitioner for back pain: familiarity with treatment or experiences with individual practitioners; recommendations from social networks; geographical proximity of practitioners; and, qualifications and credentials of practitioners. The therapeutic approach or evidence-base of the practices being utilised was not reported by the women as central to their back pain treatment decision making. CONCLUSIONS: Choice of practitioner appears to be unrelated to the therapeutic approaches, treatment practices or the scientific basis of therapeutic practices. Moreover, anecdotal lay reports of effectiveness and the ‘treatment experience’ may be more influential than formal qualifications in guiding women’s choice of practitioner for their back pain. Further work is needed on the interpersonal, collective and subjective underpinnings of practitioner choice, particularly over time, in order to better understand why women utilise certain practitioners for back pain. BioMed Central 2014-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3998023/ /pubmed/24655816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-131 Text en Copyright © 2014 Kirby et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kirby, Emma R
Broom, Alex F
Adams, Jon
Sibbritt, David W
Refshauge, Kathryn M
A qualitative study of influences on older women’s practitioner choices for back pain care
title A qualitative study of influences on older women’s practitioner choices for back pain care
title_full A qualitative study of influences on older women’s practitioner choices for back pain care
title_fullStr A qualitative study of influences on older women’s practitioner choices for back pain care
title_full_unstemmed A qualitative study of influences on older women’s practitioner choices for back pain care
title_short A qualitative study of influences on older women’s practitioner choices for back pain care
title_sort qualitative study of influences on older women’s practitioner choices for back pain care
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3998023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24655816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-131
work_keys_str_mv AT kirbyemmar aqualitativestudyofinfluencesonolderwomenspractitionerchoicesforbackpaincare
AT broomalexf aqualitativestudyofinfluencesonolderwomenspractitionerchoicesforbackpaincare
AT adamsjon aqualitativestudyofinfluencesonolderwomenspractitionerchoicesforbackpaincare
AT sibbrittdavidw aqualitativestudyofinfluencesonolderwomenspractitionerchoicesforbackpaincare
AT refshaugekathrynm aqualitativestudyofinfluencesonolderwomenspractitionerchoicesforbackpaincare
AT kirbyemmar qualitativestudyofinfluencesonolderwomenspractitionerchoicesforbackpaincare
AT broomalexf qualitativestudyofinfluencesonolderwomenspractitionerchoicesforbackpaincare
AT adamsjon qualitativestudyofinfluencesonolderwomenspractitionerchoicesforbackpaincare
AT sibbrittdavidw qualitativestudyofinfluencesonolderwomenspractitionerchoicesforbackpaincare
AT refshaugekathrynm qualitativestudyofinfluencesonolderwomenspractitionerchoicesforbackpaincare