Cargando…

PLIC: protein–ligand interaction clusters

Most of the biological processes are governed through specific protein–ligand interactions. Discerning different components that contribute toward a favorable protein– ligand interaction could contribute significantly toward better understanding protein function, rationalizing drug design and obtain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anand, Praveen, Nagarajan, Deepesh, Mukherjee, Sumanta, Chandra, Nagasuma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3998096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24763918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/database/bau029
_version_ 1782313295785492480
author Anand, Praveen
Nagarajan, Deepesh
Mukherjee, Sumanta
Chandra, Nagasuma
author_facet Anand, Praveen
Nagarajan, Deepesh
Mukherjee, Sumanta
Chandra, Nagasuma
author_sort Anand, Praveen
collection PubMed
description Most of the biological processes are governed through specific protein–ligand interactions. Discerning different components that contribute toward a favorable protein– ligand interaction could contribute significantly toward better understanding protein function, rationalizing drug design and obtaining design principles for protein engineering. The Protein Data Bank (PDB) currently hosts the structure of ∼68 000 protein–ligand complexes. Although several databases exist that classify proteins according to sequence and structure, a mere handful of them annotate and classify protein–ligand interactions and provide information on different attributes of molecular recognition. In this study, an exhaustive comparison of all the biologically relevant ligand-binding sites (84 846 sites) has been conducted using PocketMatch: a rapid, parallel, in-house algorithm. PocketMatch quantifies the similarity between binding sites based on structural descriptors and residue attributes. A similarity network was constructed using binding sites whose PocketMatch scores exceeded a high similarity threshold (0.80). The binding site similarity network was clustered into discrete sets of similar sites using the Markov clustering (MCL) algorithm. Furthermore, various computational tools have been used to study different attributes of interactions within the individual clusters. The attributes can be roughly divided into (i) binding site characteristics including pocket shape, nature of residues and interaction profiles with different kinds of atomic probes, (ii) atomic contacts consisting of various types of polar, hydrophobic and aromatic contacts along with binding site water molecules that could play crucial roles in protein–ligand interactions and (iii) binding energetics involved in interactions derived from scoring functions developed for docking. For each ligand-binding site in each protein in the PDB, site similarity information, clusters they belong to and description of site attributes are provided as a relational database—protein–ligand interaction clusters (PLIC). Database URL: http://proline.biochem.iisc.ernet.in/PLIC
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3998096
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39980962014-04-25 PLIC: protein–ligand interaction clusters Anand, Praveen Nagarajan, Deepesh Mukherjee, Sumanta Chandra, Nagasuma Database (Oxford) Database Tool Most of the biological processes are governed through specific protein–ligand interactions. Discerning different components that contribute toward a favorable protein– ligand interaction could contribute significantly toward better understanding protein function, rationalizing drug design and obtaining design principles for protein engineering. The Protein Data Bank (PDB) currently hosts the structure of ∼68 000 protein–ligand complexes. Although several databases exist that classify proteins according to sequence and structure, a mere handful of them annotate and classify protein–ligand interactions and provide information on different attributes of molecular recognition. In this study, an exhaustive comparison of all the biologically relevant ligand-binding sites (84 846 sites) has been conducted using PocketMatch: a rapid, parallel, in-house algorithm. PocketMatch quantifies the similarity between binding sites based on structural descriptors and residue attributes. A similarity network was constructed using binding sites whose PocketMatch scores exceeded a high similarity threshold (0.80). The binding site similarity network was clustered into discrete sets of similar sites using the Markov clustering (MCL) algorithm. Furthermore, various computational tools have been used to study different attributes of interactions within the individual clusters. The attributes can be roughly divided into (i) binding site characteristics including pocket shape, nature of residues and interaction profiles with different kinds of atomic probes, (ii) atomic contacts consisting of various types of polar, hydrophobic and aromatic contacts along with binding site water molecules that could play crucial roles in protein–ligand interactions and (iii) binding energetics involved in interactions derived from scoring functions developed for docking. For each ligand-binding site in each protein in the PDB, site similarity information, clusters they belong to and description of site attributes are provided as a relational database—protein–ligand interaction clusters (PLIC). Database URL: http://proline.biochem.iisc.ernet.in/PLIC Oxford University Press 2014-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3998096/ /pubmed/24763918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/database/bau029 Text en © The Author(s) 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Database Tool
Anand, Praveen
Nagarajan, Deepesh
Mukherjee, Sumanta
Chandra, Nagasuma
PLIC: protein–ligand interaction clusters
title PLIC: protein–ligand interaction clusters
title_full PLIC: protein–ligand interaction clusters
title_fullStr PLIC: protein–ligand interaction clusters
title_full_unstemmed PLIC: protein–ligand interaction clusters
title_short PLIC: protein–ligand interaction clusters
title_sort plic: protein–ligand interaction clusters
topic Database Tool
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3998096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24763918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/database/bau029
work_keys_str_mv AT anandpraveen plicproteinligandinteractionclusters
AT nagarajandeepesh plicproteinligandinteractionclusters
AT mukherjeesumanta plicproteinligandinteractionclusters
AT chandranagasuma plicproteinligandinteractionclusters